
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://vmcoolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Mcdonald</id>
	<title>CoolWiki - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://vmcoolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Mcdonald"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://vmcoolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/index.php/Special:Contributions/Mcdonald"/>
	<updated>2026-06-02T23:14:06Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.34.2</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://vmcoolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/index.php?title=Lynds_Target_Selection&amp;diff=3235</id>
		<title>Lynds Target Selection</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://vmcoolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/index.php?title=Lynds_Target_Selection&amp;diff=3235"/>
		<updated>2008-04-22T04:23:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mcdonald: /* Travel Arrangements */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I haven't done this legwork yet because I thought you might want to be involved - finding a good target for observation is a substantial part of doing science! :)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ideally, we'd pick a target for our observation using a combination of &lt;br /&gt;
*'''searching [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abstract_service.html ADS] and/or [http://simbad.u-strasbg.fr/simbad/ SIMBAD] for existing literature''' .... we want something that doesn't have a LOT of other references, but some references are fine - if someone else has already assembled data on an object, we might be able to use those data and/or results - we just don't want something that has already been &amp;quot;done to death.&amp;quot;  ([[How_can_I_find_out_what_scientists_already_know_about_a_particular_astronomy_topic_or_object%3F|page from the wiki on literature searching]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''checking POSS and other existing multi-wavelength data to see what the object looks like in those bands''' .... does it look thick and dark in the optical?  bright in the infrared?  Both of those things suggest that it will be interesting with Spitzer.  Something that looks diaphanous in the optical will likely turn out to be completely transparent with Spitzer. ([[How_can_I_get_data_from_other_wavelengths_to_compare_with_infrared_data_from_Spitzer%3F|page from the wiki on introduction to data at other wavelengths]]; you can also do this with Leopard -- see next item.)&lt;br /&gt;
*and, '''checking to see if it is or is not in the Spitzer archive''' .... you need to use Leopard to do this. ([[How_do_I_download_data_from_the_Spitzer_Telescope%3F|page from the wiki on searching the archive using Leopard]]-- NB: &amp;quot;searching the archive to see what is there&amp;quot; is the same thing as &amp;quot;downloading data&amp;quot; except that when you search to see what is there, you don't actually download the data, you just see that there is something there.)  Also, note that just because there is data already in the Archive on a given cloud doesn't mean it's a BAD thing, just that it's not a good thing for a new proposal.  You should make a note of the &amp;quot;nice&amp;quot; ones you find, because you can go grab the data as soon as the data are public.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My original thoughts on good targets were the following three: LDN 470, LDN 1225, LDN 880  (but maybe too diaphanous).  And, at the AAS, you guys also came up with LDN 1340.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=General information re: lists of targets=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The master list of objects that I worked from is [[lyndslist.txt|here]], courtesy of Babar Ali.  Note that these are all opacity class 5 objects.  Opacity class 5 or higher is what we probably want for Spitzer observations.  None of these have many references in ADS.  '''This is not meant to be a comprehensive list''' by any means, just a place to start.  If you want to instead start with the complete Lynds Dark Nebulae catalog, it's [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996yCat.7007....0L here] (the data are linked as &amp;quot;online data&amp;quot; or something similar).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please post your thoughts and reactions to each of these targets, and any new ones you think are viable candidates for observation.  For example, you might post a gif or jpeg of the POSS image you found, or a summary list of references (e.g., &amp;quot;3 papers besides Lynds, one radio, others submm&amp;quot; or whatever).  Note the syntax I'm using to post comments on LDN 1340 below -- this is a method suggested by the Oil City folks, and I think it works really well to follow the conversation.  See the help page linked from the left (above the search box) for hints on how do this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Guastella|Guastella]] 20:48, 8 January 2008 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
Here is the article I mentioned in our meeting earlier today. ''(this is the one that looked in radio at optically-selected cores and reported which ones were &amp;quot;empty.&amp;quot;'')&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
THE ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL SUPPLEMENT SERIES, 123:233È250, 1999 July&lt;br /&gt;
(1999. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in U.S.A.&lt;br /&gt;
A CATALOG OF OPTICALLY SELECTED CORES&lt;br /&gt;
CHANG WON LEE AND PHILIP C. MYERS&lt;br /&gt;
[...]&lt;br /&gt;
This didn't format well.  Please let me know if there is a better way to send papers&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks&lt;br /&gt;
Pete [END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 09:25, 9 January 2008 (PST) he's right, this didn't format well, so I replaced it with a link directly to ADS, from which you can get the complete article - there's no access restrictions on it, and if you go there, you can get the originally formatted PDF or the html.  [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJS..123..233L ADS link to the Lee and Myers paper] [END] )&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 13:44, 14 January 2008 (PST) David added some general target selection stuff to the [https://coolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/index.php/Talk:Lynds_Target_Selection talk page] [END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 07:55, 18 January 2008 (PST) [[weeding down a big target list]] - step-by-step, what I did to weed down the full Lynds target list. [END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Observing time=&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 13:59, 14 January 2008 (PST) David asked re: time to cover area.&lt;br /&gt;
A map I have here that goes about the depth we want covers about 0.6deg x0.6 deg with IRAC takes 1.5 hrs, and more or less the same area takes another 1.4 hrs with MIPS.  3 hrs is probably too much to ask for, especially if you want to ask for more than one cloud.  less than that size, 0.3 deg x 0.3 deg, with IRAC takes 0.4 hrs, and up to 0.7 hrs with MIPS. (i can get clever and try to make that less time, but this is the lowest-energy solution.)  For an irregularly-sized thing like LDN 951, i can get creative and make something other than a square map, but it takes longer for me to design.&lt;br /&gt;
so we need to decide if '''(a) we have something really cool we want to completely map, or (b) two smaller things (could be pieces of a large thing) we want to map to compare them.'''&lt;br /&gt;
Note that, for example, the object LDN 1340 is more like ~1 degree x ~1 degree, so we'd have to do just a small piece (or two small pieces) of it.&lt;br /&gt;
[END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=LDN 470=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:ldn470possred.gif]]  LDN 470 in POSS-red.  image is 0.25 deg on a side. --[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 14:09, 14 January 2008 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Mcdonald|Mcdonald]] 15:39, 15 January 2008 (PST)   Hi, here is a colored image of LDN 470:&lt;br /&gt;
   [[Image:ldn470.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=LDN 1225=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:ldn1225possred.gif]]  LDN 1225 in POSS-red.  image is 0.25 deg on a side. --[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 14:09, 14 January 2008 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Mcdonald|Mcdonald]] 15:44, 15 January 2008 (PST)   Here is a 15 arcmin x 15 arcmin colored image of ldn1225:&lt;br /&gt;
   [[Image:ldn1225.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=LDN 880=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:ldn880possred.gif |left]]  LDN 880 in POSS-red.  image is 0.25 deg on a side.   Still a little worried that this is too optically thin to make a good Spitzer image.  but maybe we could focus very specifically on the dark thing to the southwest. &lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 14:09, 14 January 2008 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:deepi.png]] [[image:deepr.png]] - LDN 880, about the same scale, in relatively deep I and R from the USNO 1.0m.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 14:43, 14 January 2008 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Mcdonald|Mcdonald]] 15:47, 15 January 2008 (PST)   Here is John's colored image made in Austin again 15 x 15 arcmin:&lt;br /&gt;
   [[Image:LDN880 by John.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=LDN 1340=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:ldn1340possred.gif|left]]  LDN 1340 in POSS-red.  image is 0.25 deg on a side. --[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 14:09, 14 January 2008 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 20:14, 8 January 2008 (PST)  Here's a summary of the latest developments on this object:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of you (Peter?) suggested this object - and it was a fabulous suggestion.  Beautiful in the optical, with IRAS sources, a handful of existing literature, and no Spitzer. Perfect!  The icing on the cake was that it's visible in the Spring.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of you (Peter again?) noticed that there was another AAS poster from 2005 on this object.  I mentioned that I knew 2 of the authors (JoAnn O'Linger and Grace Wolf-Chase).  Not 2 hours after leaving you, I ran into them.  One thing I didn't mention in the context of searching the archive is that there is an open call for proposals out now, eg., there are ~700 proposals for objects that are currently being reviewed, and 20% of them will get their targets approved by March.  To some extent, since you're putting in a proposal more or less now, you kind of trump them.  On the other hand, it's never good to make enemies....  So, it turns out that JoAnn and collaborators have submitted a proposal to map this region over 1 square degree.  There's no guarantee that their data will actually be taken this cycle (before we run out of cryogen in Spring 2009), but at the same time, we probably won't be able to ask for a full square degree (it would take too much time).  We could pick a subregion to focus on, or we could find another target entirely.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'll continue to talk to JoAnn (we had just a brief conversation today), and if I can get her posters (one from before, one from this meeting!), I'll post them here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Guastella|Guastella]] 20:48, 8 January 2008 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
In case we are still looking at this here is the 2005 Abstract&lt;br /&gt;
Submillimetre Observations of an Intermediate-Mass Star Forming Cloud Core J. O’Linger, G. H. Moriarty-&lt;br /&gt;
Schieven, and G. A. Wolf-Chase&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005AAS...20718413O ADS link to AAS abstract]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005prpl.conf.8600O ADS link to PPV abstract]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 09:37, 9 January 2008 (PST) I talked to JoAnn again today, and she thinks that maybe doing just a piece of the cloud would be a good idea.  She showed me some of her supporting data, and indeed this is a really cool area. We could do just a part of it now, and eventually, she'll map the rest of the cloud as well.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's her poster from today: [[Media:joann2008poster.pdf]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[END]&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Mcdonald|Mcdonald]] 15:51, 15 January 2008 (PST)   15 x 15 colored image:&lt;br /&gt;
   [[Image:ldn1340.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=LDN 951=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From:   cdewolf@chsd.us&lt;br /&gt;
How does LDN 951 look? Assuming I did my query right, it also hasn't been looked at by Spitzer. I found it on a list of LDNs that have visual opacities of 6 in a paper by Visser et. al, 2002. There's another, but it doesn't look as interesting.&lt;br /&gt;
Cris L. DeWolf&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:LDN951.red.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 14:00, 9 January 2008 (PST) ooh, this is a nice one!  you're right, it doesn't have any Spitzer observations yet.  This might very well be a good candidate!  [END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Dewolf|Dewolf]] 06:00, 12 January 2008 (PST)There was a study of IRAS associations with dark clouds (Parker, N.D., 1988) that appears to indicate a good chance of there being a YSO in LDN 951. Here's a link to the article.&lt;br /&gt;
[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1988MNRAS.235..139P&amp;amp;db_key=AST&amp;amp;link_type=ABSTRACT&amp;amp;high=4788c3397d22375]&lt;br /&gt;
[END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Mcdonald|Mcdonald]] 15:54, 15 January 2008 (PST)   A 15 x 15 arcmin colored image:&lt;br /&gt;
   [[Image:ldn951.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Other targets=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 11:42, 9 January 2008 (PST) I found two posters today on Lynds clouds - L1221 and L988e.  L1221 has Spitzer data which is pretty cool; L988 doesn't have any Spitzer data.  Take a look at the other bands and references and see if it would be interesting....&lt;br /&gt;
[END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 14:09, 14 January 2008 (PST) nevermind; the L988 image is pretty much just a star field. [END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:l1014.jpg|left]]&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 14:27, 14 January 2008 (PST) just for comparison, here is a spitzer composite image of L1014. we'd be very lucky to find something like this, but this is the hope. [END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 13:44, 14 January 2008 (PST) David added some general target selection stuff to the [https://coolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/index.php/Talk:Lynds_Target_Selection talk page] [END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 10:48, 15 January 2008 (PST) Out of David's top 16 suggestions, the only ones wihtout existing spitzer data are ldn   &lt;br /&gt;
1357 (right on the edge of some existing spitzer data) and ldn 1358.  you must be doing something right, as you're hitting popular objects. ;)   [END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 14:19, 21 January 2008 (PST) but really from jan 20: tim sent this in email:&lt;br /&gt;
   I have been doing some looking at the Lynds targets.  I'm attaching pics of LDN 1598 and LDN 1340.  &lt;br /&gt;
   I could not find anything in ADS about either of these targets, so it looks like they have not been &lt;br /&gt;
   studied a great deal.  I like the fact that you have a dark area next to a fairly rich star field &lt;br /&gt;
   (especially with 1598).  This would tend to indicate a dense nebulous area.  the images are 5'x5'. (targets suggested by Tim Spuck)&lt;br /&gt;
here's the graphics: (L1598 first, then L1340):&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:tim_l1598.jpg]] [[image:tim_l1340.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 14:26, 21 January 2008 (PST) actually, i get 19 references for ldn 1598, and 15 for L1340, both using simbad... [END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Spuck|Spuck]] 05:37, 22 January 2008 (PST)  Luisa, just for future reference, I thought ADS was a more complete database for identification of current research.  I assume this is not the case since you found many references in simbad.  Is that correct?  Thanks, Tim  [END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Spuck|Spuck]] 06:57, 22 January 2008 (PST)  Ok ... I think I may have answered part of my question.  I was seaching on LDN1598 and coming up with nothing, but if I search on L1598 or L1340 I am at least coming up with something in ADS (one for 1598, and seven for L1340).  I need to play with the parameters a bit. [END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 17:57, 22 January 2008 (PST) they're different sorts of databases, with different strengths and weaknesses.  ADS is driven by the literature itself, whereas SIMBAD is driven more by object lists.  ADS is usually more complete.  But, for example, some of the references for L1685 don't actually call it L1685 anywhere in the paper.  ADS may or may not have the information that those papers really do have data about that object - sometimes ADS knows, and sometimes ADS doesn't.  Someone at the SIMBAD end did realize (or at least THINKS) that the objects are the same, and has (hopefully correctly) tied the object to the paper.  SIMBAD often requires a human to make the association between synonyms for certain objects, and this can be fallible, especially for the more obscure objects.  ADS is generally more accurate in the following sense - SIMBAD may quote a spectral type, but to be sure that whatever object you are looking at really has that type, track down the original papers and make sure that the actual original paper really does cite that type.  More obscure papers are rarely in SIMBAD, but they can be found in ADS.  ADS and SIMBAD are heavily interlinked, so there's a lot of ways to get between them. [END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Dewolf|Dewolf]] 22 Jan 2008 10:19:06 (question submitted via regular email): I'd seen some images [before] with the large pixel areas as well. How do you find a potential IRAS source in a small LDN with such poor resolution? [END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 10:19, 22 January 2008 (PST): &lt;br /&gt;
Your question really has a two-part answer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first part is that I'm not detecting sources by eye.  I'm relying upon the computer-generated IRAS Point Source Catalog (PSC) and Faint Source Catalog (FSC) which are described along with the rest of the IRAS mission&lt;br /&gt;
information here: http://irsa.ipac.caltech.edu/IRASdocs/iras.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you get into the documentation, you will find that the catalog consists of, among other things, measurements at each of the 4 IRAS wavelengths, and a quality flag for each of the 4 bands.  This quality flag is REALLY&lt;br /&gt;
IMPORTANT, as it tells us whether the computer thought it was a real detection at each band, or just an upper limit at a particular band. Because the resolution of IRAS is so poor, indeed, it can be fooled.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the objects in our shortlist below really did have a recognizable clear point source right on the center of the object at 25 um. But, the rest, I agree, I'd be hard-pressed to identify the source by eye. That doesn't mean it's not there, however.  The computer is really good at finding real, faint sources.  When we go to write this up, we really should pay attention to whether the computer felt it was a point source just at 100 um and not at 12 or 25 um.  For this subset of objects, I am cheating a little because several of them have observations at other wavelengths, enough so that I know there's a real source there, so I didn't go check the quality flags for those objects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The second aspect of the answer is that when we go look with Spitzer, it could very well be that the source dissolves away into background nebulosity, or breaks into pieces.  We have an image at 24 um of something in the Perseus star-forming region that appears in the IRAS catalog as a single object, IRAS 03388+3139.  But, when we look with Spitzer, it breaks up into 9 objects.  This stuff appeared in Rebull et al., 2007, ApJS, 171, 447 (also findable in astro-ph, look near Jan 2007), along with an analysis of what IRAS sources dissolved away completely into nebulosity when viewed with Spitzer.  The nebulosity is very complex here, so it happens.&lt;br /&gt;
[END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=A (The?) Shortlist=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Goal: find anywhere from one to a few LDN likely to host young stars so that we not only have a pretty picture but also find some new baby stars.  If we are going to ask for more than one cloud, they need to have different properties, so that we can explain that we are looking at THIS sort and THAT sort to compare.  And we can (should) also say we will mine the Spitzer archive for more examples.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Luisa's Favorites==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|LDN &lt;br /&gt;
|Image&lt;br /&gt;
|Notes&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|951 &lt;br /&gt;
|[[image:ldn951_possred.jpg]] (POSS/Red, 0.25 deg on side)&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
* from cris (see above.)&lt;br /&gt;
* opacity class 6 (good, deep and dark)&lt;br /&gt;
* 'linear' (as opposed to 'blobby')&lt;br /&gt;
* (Visser et al. 2002, AJ, 124, 2756) part of the cygnus rift, 700 pc away, max extinction Av=10, just 4.7 Msun in cloud&lt;br /&gt;
* IRAS source 21186+4320&lt;br /&gt;
* (ref?) two submm 'starless cores' here : in 1950 coordinates 21:18:20 +43:19:17 and 21:18:22.9 +43:19:51 -&amp;gt; we might not find anything, but we might find some of the youngest stars forming here.&lt;br /&gt;
* visible to spitzer through tomorrow 1/22 (argh!); next window june 27-sep 10.&lt;br /&gt;
*IRAC total time 907 sec, MIPS total time 3313 seconds.  IRAC: [[media:ldn951_withirac.gif]] (irac has two fields of view, portrayed by the two colors; the region covered by both colors is the region we'll get with all 4 irac bands [3.6, 4.5, 5.8, and 8 um].  note that the specific portion of sky that we will cover rotates, so these observations are designed to catch as much of the LDN as i can and still be independent of rotation angle.)  MIPS: [[media:ldn951_withmips.gif]] (MIPS has 3 cameras, but we're only using 2 -- indicated by the two colors, 24 and 70 um.  &lt;br /&gt;
* with irac we will see mostly stars, some nebulosity.  we need at least MIPS-24, which is 1191 seconds of the 3313 seconds; mips 24 will help us find stars, but also find the nebulosity.  in this specific case, where we have some submm cores, mips70 is important too, as it might be just at mips70 that we see these submm cores.  note that i get a little too much sky at 24 and not quite enough at 70; i'm constrained by the choices i have in the AOR construction, and i'm optimizing for science and time, not necessarily a pretty picture.&lt;br /&gt;
*TOTAL TIME: 1.2 hrs. (4 IRAC plus 2 MIPS)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|425&lt;br /&gt;
|[[image:ldn425_possred.gif]] (POSS/Red, 0.25 deg on side)&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:ldn425_mycenter_possred.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
* from cris' ppt based on some subset of my target weeding.&lt;br /&gt;
* opacity class 5 (good, pretty deep and dark)&lt;br /&gt;
* 'blobby' (as opposed to 'linear')&lt;br /&gt;
* Lee and Myers (1999, ApJS, 123, 233) find a YSO here (1950 coords: 17 44 15.4	−04 34 07)&lt;br /&gt;
* IRAS source 17442−0433&lt;br /&gt;
* Connelley et al (2007 AJ 133, 1528) find a new NIR reflection nebula here, suggestive that a YSO is illuminating the nebula, and that we will see something pretty at IRAC bands.&lt;br /&gt;
* the part that is the center of the coordinates given by lynds (center of image at left) seems offset from the darkest part as seen in POSS. X's in graphic at left are the IRAS point sources in this region; the northernmost one is the one listed in the literature. there is not much to the dark cloud north of the image region shown at left.  I'm taking as the center 17:46:55 -04:36:25; see second graphic at left.&lt;br /&gt;
* visible to spitzer apr 12-may 23, then sep 21-nov 2.&lt;br /&gt;
* IRAC total time 657 seconds ([[media:ldn425_mycenter_possred_withirac.gif]]) MIPS-24 total time only 395 seconds. Harder to justify 70 um time too here, since it will be expensive and it's not entirely clear what we will see. Could simply plan to jump on the data right away and ask for more time to do 70 if it seems likely to be interesting. ([[media:ldn425_mycenter_possred_withmips.gif]] - box is &amp;quot;my center&amp;quot; for this observation and x's are IRAS sources.) &lt;br /&gt;
*TOTAL TIME: 0.3 hrs. (4 IRAC plus 1 MIPS)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|981&lt;br /&gt;
|[[image:ldn981_possred.gif]] (POSS/Red, 0.3 (not 0.25!) deg on side)&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
* from cris' ppt based on some subset of my target weeding.&lt;br /&gt;
* opacity class 6 (good, deep and dark)&lt;br /&gt;
* 'linear' (as opposed to 'blobby')&lt;br /&gt;
* Quanz et al. (2007, ApJ, 656, 287, also astro-ph/0610786 -- see http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0610786 for free copy of paper) has a very interesting article about the structures around V1331 Cyg, a known YSO.  They were studying the immediate environment of this thing using HST, but it is at the end of one of the filaments associated with LDN 981.  One of the questions they address in this paper is whether or not V1331 Cyg formed on its own, or with 'friends.'  They talk in their paper (see sections 4.2 and 4.3) about whether some objects found in the LDN black parts are real YSOs or not, and they conclude based on available evidence that they are not YSOs.  BUT, maybe they just weren't looking in long enough wavelengths.  We might find that these stars really are YSOs... or we may not.  We may confirm that yes, they are just foreground objects superimposed on the dark lanes of the nebula.   V1331 Cyg is just on the edge of the image, to the upper left, at the end of that dark lane, with the funny circular bright nebula (that was what Quanz et al studied with HST).&lt;br /&gt;
*[[media:timldn981.jpg| image from tim comparing more wavelengths]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[media:crisldn981.jpg| image from cris comparing scales]]&lt;br /&gt;
* visible to Spitzer through jan 27 (argh!), then june 26-feb 3 (not a typo, nice and long!)&lt;br /&gt;
* some existing MIPS data to the east (left) and north (up) which we could grab and add in to our maps.&lt;br /&gt;
* IRAC total time 2152 sec ([[media:ldn981_possred_withirac.gif]]) **need to add a constraint to both IRAC and MIPS that it be done before sep 15 (1 for MIPS) in order to cover the region we want. (usually constraints are bad, but i'd have to ask for more time otherwise, and we are giving them a large window, so it should be ok.) MIPS 24 only 1191 sec. ([[media:ldn981_possred_withmips24.gif]]) Again, somewhat hard to justify asking for 70 um time, but this time, V1331 Cyg is an IRAS source, so ''maybe'' worth it. MIPS-70 alone is another 6079 sec. (!) ([[media:ldn981_possred_withmips70.gif]])&lt;br /&gt;
*TOTAL TIME: 0.9 hrs (4 irac plus 1 mips) or 2.6 hrs (4 irac plus 2 mips)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1143&lt;br /&gt;
|[[image:ldn1143_possred.gif]] (POSS/Red, 0.3 deg on side - now spot won't let me do 0.25, ??)&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
* from cris' ppt based on some subset of my target weeding.&lt;br /&gt;
* opacity class 6 (good, deep and dark)&lt;br /&gt;
* 'blobby' (as opposed to 'linear')&lt;br /&gt;
* Lee and Myers (1999, ApJS, 123, 233) find a YSO here (1950 coords: 21 57 03.0	58 42 25)&lt;br /&gt;
* IRAS source 21569+5842&lt;br /&gt;
* Connelley et al. (2007 AJ 133, 1528) find a new NIR reflection nebula here, suggestive that a YSO is illuminating the nebula, and that we will see something pretty at IRAC bands.&lt;br /&gt;
* Magnier et al. (1999, A&amp;amp;A, 352, 228) find something they call a &amp;quot;transition object&amp;quot; here, and is noted specifically as a &amp;quot;very red star.&amp;quot; It's likely we will be better able to tell what this thing is.&lt;br /&gt;
* visible to Spitzer through feb 22 (too soon to schedule us) and then jul 23-mar 2 (again, not a typo, nice and long).&lt;br /&gt;
* IRAC total time 907 sec ([[media:ldn1143_possred_withirac.gif]] - box is 'target', x's are iras sources), MIPS-24 total time 1191 sec (just mips24, not mips70 too, again hard to justify) ([[media:ldn1143_possred_withmips24.gif]]).&lt;br /&gt;
* TOTAL TIME: 0.6 hrs (4 irac plus 1 mips)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1598&lt;br /&gt;
|[[image:ldn1598_possred.gif]] (POSS/Red, 0.3 deg on side - now spot won't let me do 0.25, ??) x's are IRAS sources&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
* from Tim based on some subset of my target weeding&lt;br /&gt;
* opacity class 5 (good, pretty deep and dark)&lt;br /&gt;
* 'blobby' (as opposed to 'linear')&lt;br /&gt;
* 19 refs in SIMBAD.  &lt;br /&gt;
* IRAS 05496+0812, also WB89 718, also HH 117 VLA 1 (so clearly several people have looked here before).  This is part of the lambda Ori complex, apparently, and maybe related to alpha Ori (Betelgeuse).  There is a lot of Spitzer data covering parts of the lambda Ori complex, but evidently not this cloud and its friend, L1599.  I will ask my friends who are studying the lambda Ori complex about this object.&lt;br /&gt;
* Wu et al. (2004, A&amp;amp;A, 426, 503) studied outflows and claim to find one here, placing the cloud at 0.9 kpc.  Another paper, Hilton &amp;amp; Lahulla (1995, A&amp;amp;AS, 113, 325) cite Schwartz et al (1988) also at 900 pc.&lt;br /&gt;
* Rodriguez &amp;amp; Reipurth (1998) find the exciting source for HH117 here; our observations as planned will also cover the HH object itself.&lt;br /&gt;
* visible to spitzer mar 21-apr 29, then oct 18-nov 28.&lt;br /&gt;
* IRAC total time 907 sec ([[media:ldn1598_possred_withirac.gif]] - box is 'target', x's are iras sources), MIPS-24 total time 1191 sec (just mips24, not mips70 too, again hard to justify) ([[media:ldn1598_possred_withmips24.gif]]).&lt;br /&gt;
* TOTAL TIME: 0.6 hrs (4 irac plus 1 mips)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1685&lt;br /&gt;
|[[image:ldn1685_possred.gif]] (POSS/Red, 0.25 deg on side)&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
* from Chelen based on some subset of my target weeding&lt;br /&gt;
* opacity class 5 (good, pretty deep and dark)&lt;br /&gt;
* 'blobby' (as opposed to 'linear')&lt;br /&gt;
* 10 references in SIMBAD; aliases include BHR 157, [CB88] 73, Barnard 56, DCld 352.9+04.8 &lt;br /&gt;
* Huard et al. (1999, ApJ, 526, 833) does NOT detect this in the submm, and is able to constrain the distance at &amp;lt;160 pc (in front of the ophiuchus clouds).&lt;br /&gt;
* I think it was also undetected by Bourke et al. (1995 MNRAS) in ammonia.&lt;br /&gt;
* there is an IRAS source here; see x's in figure to left. IRAS 17056-3204 is the one closest to the center.&lt;br /&gt;
* visible to spitzer apr 4-may 13 then sep 14-oct 24&lt;br /&gt;
* IRAC total time 907 sec ([[media:ldn1685_possred_withirac.gif]] - box is 'target', x's are iras sources), MIPS-24 total time 1191 sec (just mips24, not mips70 too, again hard to justify) ([[media:ldn1685_possred_withmips24.gif]]).&lt;br /&gt;
* TOTAL TIME: 0.6 hrs (4 irac plus 1 mips)&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
the AOR file to load into spot is here: [[media:lyndsaors.aor.txt]] - i had to add a &amp;quot;.txt&amp;quot; extension to get the wiki to accept it, but you should save the file to disk and rename it as just &amp;quot;.aor&amp;quot; and then Spot will recognize it as an AOR file.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Middle-of-the-road candidates==&lt;br /&gt;
Usually they're just here because there's no good reason to reject them, but others seem prettier or more likely to host stars.&lt;br /&gt;
*LDN 470 - small, opacity class=6.  &lt;br /&gt;
*LDN 1225 - bigger, opacity class 4 only (too thin?)&lt;br /&gt;
*LDN 1125 - opacity class=5, blotchy/blobby, same as Barnard 152, Lee and Myers say YSO but appears in 'starless core' papers.&lt;br /&gt;
*LDN 1139 - opacity class=5, blotchy/blobby, Lee and Myers say YSO but appears in 'starless core' papers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Rejects, and reasons:==&lt;br /&gt;
*LDN 880 - lee and myers say no YSO; rather thin in optical images, and might just see through it in spitzer.&lt;br /&gt;
*LDN 769 - lee and myers say no YSO; mentioned in several other &amp;quot;starless core&amp;quot; papers.&lt;br /&gt;
*LDN 778 - many simbad refs (&amp;gt;40!) but most of them are 'starless core' papers&lt;br /&gt;
*LDN 1041 - image looks like a plain star field&lt;br /&gt;
*LDN 1082 - image looks like a plain star field&lt;br /&gt;
*LDN 1340 - nice image, but consensus from the group was that they wanted to work in a 'new' region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Voting and Ranking=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the editing of the table in the wiki intimidates you, or you're worried about making sure your vote appears under your column (this can be tricky), feel free to just email me your ranking, and I'll enter it here.  &amp;quot;1&amp;quot; is high (most favorite), &amp;quot;6&amp;quot; is low (least favorite).  So as not to bias you, I won't put in my votes until the very end.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|LDN &lt;br /&gt;
|Pete&lt;br /&gt;
|Chelen&lt;br /&gt;
|David&lt;br /&gt;
|John&lt;br /&gt;
|Cris&lt;br /&gt;
|Tim&lt;br /&gt;
|Luisa&lt;br /&gt;
|AVERAGE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|951 &lt;br /&gt;
|6&lt;br /&gt;
|5&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|4&lt;br /&gt;
|5&lt;br /&gt;
|5&lt;br /&gt;
|5&lt;br /&gt;
|'''4.4'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|425&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|3&lt;br /&gt;
|'''2.2'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|981&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|'''1.1'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1143&lt;br /&gt;
|3&lt;br /&gt;
|4&lt;br /&gt;
|3&lt;br /&gt;
|5&lt;br /&gt;
|3&lt;br /&gt;
|4&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|'''3.4'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1598&lt;br /&gt;
|4&lt;br /&gt;
|6&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|3&lt;br /&gt;
|4&lt;br /&gt;
|3&lt;br /&gt;
|4&lt;br /&gt;
|'''4.0'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1685&lt;br /&gt;
|5&lt;br /&gt;
|3&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|6&lt;br /&gt;
|6&lt;br /&gt;
|6&lt;br /&gt;
|6&lt;br /&gt;
|'''5.3'''&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rank-ordered list is therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
*LDN 981 (rank 1.1) - 0.9 hrs spitzer time&lt;br /&gt;
*LDN 425 (rank 2.2) - 0.3 hrs spitzer time&lt;br /&gt;
*LDN 1143 (rank 3.4) - 0.6 hrs spitzer time&lt;br /&gt;
*LDN 1598 (rank 4.0) - 0.6 hrs spitzer time&lt;br /&gt;
*LDN 951 (rank 4.4) - 1.2 hrs spitzer time&lt;br /&gt;
*LDN 1685 (rank 5.3) - 0.6 hrs spitzer time&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would counsel that you write a proposal for the top two clouds.  They have some different properties, and the total time request of 1.2 hrs is not completely outrageous.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Dewolf|Dewolf]] 08:54, 29 January 2008 (PST)The paper that Luisa referred to in her discussion of LDN 981 is worth a read as we prepare our proposal. Here is a direct link to a pdf of it [[media:0610786v1.pdf]]. The authors suggest that V1331 Cyg evolved from one of the filaments in this linear cloud. To me, this implies a strong possibility of additional YSOs in the cloud. What do you think? [END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 13:02, 30 January 2008 (PST) Yep, i think it's a strong possibility, but also look at the rest of the text i posted above in the entry for 981 :&lt;br /&gt;
   Quanz et al. (2007, ApJ, 656, 287, also astro-ph/0610786 -- see http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0610786 for free &lt;br /&gt;
  copy of paper) [...] One of the questions they address in this paper is whether or not V1331 Cyg formed on its own, &lt;br /&gt;
  or with 'friends.' They talk in their paper (see sections 4.2 and 4.3) about whether some objects found in the LDN &lt;br /&gt;
  black parts are real YSOs or not, and they conclude based on available evidence that they are not YSOs. BUT, maybe &lt;br /&gt;
  they just weren't looking in long enough wavelengths. We might find that these stars really are YSOs... or we may &lt;br /&gt;
  not. We may confirm that yes, they are just foreground objects superimposed on the dark lanes of the nebula.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:CJohnson|CJohnson]] 11:11, 21 April 2008 (CDT) &lt;br /&gt;
=Travel Arrangements=&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to e-mail me your travel arrangements, I would be happy to update this chart.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|LDN &lt;br /&gt;
|Pete&lt;br /&gt;
|Chelen&lt;br /&gt;
|David&lt;br /&gt;
|John&lt;br /&gt;
|Cris&lt;br /&gt;
|Tim&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Arrival date/time &lt;br /&gt;
|x&lt;br /&gt;
|13-June, 20:15&lt;br /&gt;
|13-June&lt;br /&gt;
|13-June, &lt;br /&gt;
|13-June&lt;br /&gt;
|x&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|# of students (male/female)&lt;br /&gt;
|x&lt;br /&gt;
|0/0&lt;br /&gt;
|1/2&lt;br /&gt;
|0/0&lt;br /&gt;
|2/0&lt;br /&gt;
|x&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Hotel**&lt;br /&gt;
|x&lt;br /&gt;
|HIE&lt;br /&gt;
|x&lt;br /&gt;
|X&lt;br /&gt;
|x&lt;br /&gt;
|x&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Auto rental??&lt;br /&gt;
|x&lt;br /&gt;
|no&lt;br /&gt;
|my car&lt;br /&gt;
|no&lt;br /&gt;
|no&lt;br /&gt;
|van&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Departure date/time&lt;br /&gt;
|x&lt;br /&gt;
|18-June 7:15&lt;br /&gt;
|19-June&lt;br /&gt;
|18- June &lt;br /&gt;
|18-June&lt;br /&gt;
|x&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
**HIE=Holiday Inn Express-Pasadena, BW=Best Western Pasadena Royale &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Peace,&lt;br /&gt;
--chj&lt;br /&gt;
[END]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mcdonald</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://vmcoolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/index.php?title=Lynds_Target_Selection&amp;diff=3234</id>
		<title>Lynds Target Selection</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://vmcoolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/index.php?title=Lynds_Target_Selection&amp;diff=3234"/>
		<updated>2008-04-22T04:19:40Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mcdonald: /* Travel Arrangements */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I haven't done this legwork yet because I thought you might want to be involved - finding a good target for observation is a substantial part of doing science! :)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ideally, we'd pick a target for our observation using a combination of &lt;br /&gt;
*'''searching [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abstract_service.html ADS] and/or [http://simbad.u-strasbg.fr/simbad/ SIMBAD] for existing literature''' .... we want something that doesn't have a LOT of other references, but some references are fine - if someone else has already assembled data on an object, we might be able to use those data and/or results - we just don't want something that has already been &amp;quot;done to death.&amp;quot;  ([[How_can_I_find_out_what_scientists_already_know_about_a_particular_astronomy_topic_or_object%3F|page from the wiki on literature searching]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''checking POSS and other existing multi-wavelength data to see what the object looks like in those bands''' .... does it look thick and dark in the optical?  bright in the infrared?  Both of those things suggest that it will be interesting with Spitzer.  Something that looks diaphanous in the optical will likely turn out to be completely transparent with Spitzer. ([[How_can_I_get_data_from_other_wavelengths_to_compare_with_infrared_data_from_Spitzer%3F|page from the wiki on introduction to data at other wavelengths]]; you can also do this with Leopard -- see next item.)&lt;br /&gt;
*and, '''checking to see if it is or is not in the Spitzer archive''' .... you need to use Leopard to do this. ([[How_do_I_download_data_from_the_Spitzer_Telescope%3F|page from the wiki on searching the archive using Leopard]]-- NB: &amp;quot;searching the archive to see what is there&amp;quot; is the same thing as &amp;quot;downloading data&amp;quot; except that when you search to see what is there, you don't actually download the data, you just see that there is something there.)  Also, note that just because there is data already in the Archive on a given cloud doesn't mean it's a BAD thing, just that it's not a good thing for a new proposal.  You should make a note of the &amp;quot;nice&amp;quot; ones you find, because you can go grab the data as soon as the data are public.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My original thoughts on good targets were the following three: LDN 470, LDN 1225, LDN 880  (but maybe too diaphanous).  And, at the AAS, you guys also came up with LDN 1340.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=General information re: lists of targets=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The master list of objects that I worked from is [[lyndslist.txt|here]], courtesy of Babar Ali.  Note that these are all opacity class 5 objects.  Opacity class 5 or higher is what we probably want for Spitzer observations.  None of these have many references in ADS.  '''This is not meant to be a comprehensive list''' by any means, just a place to start.  If you want to instead start with the complete Lynds Dark Nebulae catalog, it's [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996yCat.7007....0L here] (the data are linked as &amp;quot;online data&amp;quot; or something similar).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please post your thoughts and reactions to each of these targets, and any new ones you think are viable candidates for observation.  For example, you might post a gif or jpeg of the POSS image you found, or a summary list of references (e.g., &amp;quot;3 papers besides Lynds, one radio, others submm&amp;quot; or whatever).  Note the syntax I'm using to post comments on LDN 1340 below -- this is a method suggested by the Oil City folks, and I think it works really well to follow the conversation.  See the help page linked from the left (above the search box) for hints on how do this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Guastella|Guastella]] 20:48, 8 January 2008 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
Here is the article I mentioned in our meeting earlier today. ''(this is the one that looked in radio at optically-selected cores and reported which ones were &amp;quot;empty.&amp;quot;'')&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
THE ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL SUPPLEMENT SERIES, 123:233È250, 1999 July&lt;br /&gt;
(1999. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in U.S.A.&lt;br /&gt;
A CATALOG OF OPTICALLY SELECTED CORES&lt;br /&gt;
CHANG WON LEE AND PHILIP C. MYERS&lt;br /&gt;
[...]&lt;br /&gt;
This didn't format well.  Please let me know if there is a better way to send papers&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks&lt;br /&gt;
Pete [END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 09:25, 9 January 2008 (PST) he's right, this didn't format well, so I replaced it with a link directly to ADS, from which you can get the complete article - there's no access restrictions on it, and if you go there, you can get the originally formatted PDF or the html.  [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJS..123..233L ADS link to the Lee and Myers paper] [END] )&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 13:44, 14 January 2008 (PST) David added some general target selection stuff to the [https://coolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/index.php/Talk:Lynds_Target_Selection talk page] [END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 07:55, 18 January 2008 (PST) [[weeding down a big target list]] - step-by-step, what I did to weed down the full Lynds target list. [END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Observing time=&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 13:59, 14 January 2008 (PST) David asked re: time to cover area.&lt;br /&gt;
A map I have here that goes about the depth we want covers about 0.6deg x0.6 deg with IRAC takes 1.5 hrs, and more or less the same area takes another 1.4 hrs with MIPS.  3 hrs is probably too much to ask for, especially if you want to ask for more than one cloud.  less than that size, 0.3 deg x 0.3 deg, with IRAC takes 0.4 hrs, and up to 0.7 hrs with MIPS. (i can get clever and try to make that less time, but this is the lowest-energy solution.)  For an irregularly-sized thing like LDN 951, i can get creative and make something other than a square map, but it takes longer for me to design.&lt;br /&gt;
so we need to decide if '''(a) we have something really cool we want to completely map, or (b) two smaller things (could be pieces of a large thing) we want to map to compare them.'''&lt;br /&gt;
Note that, for example, the object LDN 1340 is more like ~1 degree x ~1 degree, so we'd have to do just a small piece (or two small pieces) of it.&lt;br /&gt;
[END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=LDN 470=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:ldn470possred.gif]]  LDN 470 in POSS-red.  image is 0.25 deg on a side. --[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 14:09, 14 January 2008 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Mcdonald|Mcdonald]] 15:39, 15 January 2008 (PST)   Hi, here is a colored image of LDN 470:&lt;br /&gt;
   [[Image:ldn470.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=LDN 1225=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:ldn1225possred.gif]]  LDN 1225 in POSS-red.  image is 0.25 deg on a side. --[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 14:09, 14 January 2008 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Mcdonald|Mcdonald]] 15:44, 15 January 2008 (PST)   Here is a 15 arcmin x 15 arcmin colored image of ldn1225:&lt;br /&gt;
   [[Image:ldn1225.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=LDN 880=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:ldn880possred.gif |left]]  LDN 880 in POSS-red.  image is 0.25 deg on a side.   Still a little worried that this is too optically thin to make a good Spitzer image.  but maybe we could focus very specifically on the dark thing to the southwest. &lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 14:09, 14 January 2008 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:deepi.png]] [[image:deepr.png]] - LDN 880, about the same scale, in relatively deep I and R from the USNO 1.0m.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 14:43, 14 January 2008 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Mcdonald|Mcdonald]] 15:47, 15 January 2008 (PST)   Here is John's colored image made in Austin again 15 x 15 arcmin:&lt;br /&gt;
   [[Image:LDN880 by John.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=LDN 1340=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:ldn1340possred.gif|left]]  LDN 1340 in POSS-red.  image is 0.25 deg on a side. --[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 14:09, 14 January 2008 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 20:14, 8 January 2008 (PST)  Here's a summary of the latest developments on this object:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of you (Peter?) suggested this object - and it was a fabulous suggestion.  Beautiful in the optical, with IRAS sources, a handful of existing literature, and no Spitzer. Perfect!  The icing on the cake was that it's visible in the Spring.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of you (Peter again?) noticed that there was another AAS poster from 2005 on this object.  I mentioned that I knew 2 of the authors (JoAnn O'Linger and Grace Wolf-Chase).  Not 2 hours after leaving you, I ran into them.  One thing I didn't mention in the context of searching the archive is that there is an open call for proposals out now, eg., there are ~700 proposals for objects that are currently being reviewed, and 20% of them will get their targets approved by March.  To some extent, since you're putting in a proposal more or less now, you kind of trump them.  On the other hand, it's never good to make enemies....  So, it turns out that JoAnn and collaborators have submitted a proposal to map this region over 1 square degree.  There's no guarantee that their data will actually be taken this cycle (before we run out of cryogen in Spring 2009), but at the same time, we probably won't be able to ask for a full square degree (it would take too much time).  We could pick a subregion to focus on, or we could find another target entirely.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'll continue to talk to JoAnn (we had just a brief conversation today), and if I can get her posters (one from before, one from this meeting!), I'll post them here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Guastella|Guastella]] 20:48, 8 January 2008 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
In case we are still looking at this here is the 2005 Abstract&lt;br /&gt;
Submillimetre Observations of an Intermediate-Mass Star Forming Cloud Core J. O’Linger, G. H. Moriarty-&lt;br /&gt;
Schieven, and G. A. Wolf-Chase&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005AAS...20718413O ADS link to AAS abstract]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005prpl.conf.8600O ADS link to PPV abstract]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 09:37, 9 January 2008 (PST) I talked to JoAnn again today, and she thinks that maybe doing just a piece of the cloud would be a good idea.  She showed me some of her supporting data, and indeed this is a really cool area. We could do just a part of it now, and eventually, she'll map the rest of the cloud as well.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's her poster from today: [[Media:joann2008poster.pdf]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[END]&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Mcdonald|Mcdonald]] 15:51, 15 January 2008 (PST)   15 x 15 colored image:&lt;br /&gt;
   [[Image:ldn1340.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=LDN 951=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From:   cdewolf@chsd.us&lt;br /&gt;
How does LDN 951 look? Assuming I did my query right, it also hasn't been looked at by Spitzer. I found it on a list of LDNs that have visual opacities of 6 in a paper by Visser et. al, 2002. There's another, but it doesn't look as interesting.&lt;br /&gt;
Cris L. DeWolf&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:LDN951.red.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 14:00, 9 January 2008 (PST) ooh, this is a nice one!  you're right, it doesn't have any Spitzer observations yet.  This might very well be a good candidate!  [END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Dewolf|Dewolf]] 06:00, 12 January 2008 (PST)There was a study of IRAS associations with dark clouds (Parker, N.D., 1988) that appears to indicate a good chance of there being a YSO in LDN 951. Here's a link to the article.&lt;br /&gt;
[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1988MNRAS.235..139P&amp;amp;db_key=AST&amp;amp;link_type=ABSTRACT&amp;amp;high=4788c3397d22375]&lt;br /&gt;
[END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Mcdonald|Mcdonald]] 15:54, 15 January 2008 (PST)   A 15 x 15 arcmin colored image:&lt;br /&gt;
   [[Image:ldn951.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Other targets=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 11:42, 9 January 2008 (PST) I found two posters today on Lynds clouds - L1221 and L988e.  L1221 has Spitzer data which is pretty cool; L988 doesn't have any Spitzer data.  Take a look at the other bands and references and see if it would be interesting....&lt;br /&gt;
[END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 14:09, 14 January 2008 (PST) nevermind; the L988 image is pretty much just a star field. [END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:l1014.jpg|left]]&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 14:27, 14 January 2008 (PST) just for comparison, here is a spitzer composite image of L1014. we'd be very lucky to find something like this, but this is the hope. [END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 13:44, 14 January 2008 (PST) David added some general target selection stuff to the [https://coolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/index.php/Talk:Lynds_Target_Selection talk page] [END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 10:48, 15 January 2008 (PST) Out of David's top 16 suggestions, the only ones wihtout existing spitzer data are ldn   &lt;br /&gt;
1357 (right on the edge of some existing spitzer data) and ldn 1358.  you must be doing something right, as you're hitting popular objects. ;)   [END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 14:19, 21 January 2008 (PST) but really from jan 20: tim sent this in email:&lt;br /&gt;
   I have been doing some looking at the Lynds targets.  I'm attaching pics of LDN 1598 and LDN 1340.  &lt;br /&gt;
   I could not find anything in ADS about either of these targets, so it looks like they have not been &lt;br /&gt;
   studied a great deal.  I like the fact that you have a dark area next to a fairly rich star field &lt;br /&gt;
   (especially with 1598).  This would tend to indicate a dense nebulous area.  the images are 5'x5'. (targets suggested by Tim Spuck)&lt;br /&gt;
here's the graphics: (L1598 first, then L1340):&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:tim_l1598.jpg]] [[image:tim_l1340.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 14:26, 21 January 2008 (PST) actually, i get 19 references for ldn 1598, and 15 for L1340, both using simbad... [END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Spuck|Spuck]] 05:37, 22 January 2008 (PST)  Luisa, just for future reference, I thought ADS was a more complete database for identification of current research.  I assume this is not the case since you found many references in simbad.  Is that correct?  Thanks, Tim  [END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Spuck|Spuck]] 06:57, 22 January 2008 (PST)  Ok ... I think I may have answered part of my question.  I was seaching on LDN1598 and coming up with nothing, but if I search on L1598 or L1340 I am at least coming up with something in ADS (one for 1598, and seven for L1340).  I need to play with the parameters a bit. [END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 17:57, 22 January 2008 (PST) they're different sorts of databases, with different strengths and weaknesses.  ADS is driven by the literature itself, whereas SIMBAD is driven more by object lists.  ADS is usually more complete.  But, for example, some of the references for L1685 don't actually call it L1685 anywhere in the paper.  ADS may or may not have the information that those papers really do have data about that object - sometimes ADS knows, and sometimes ADS doesn't.  Someone at the SIMBAD end did realize (or at least THINKS) that the objects are the same, and has (hopefully correctly) tied the object to the paper.  SIMBAD often requires a human to make the association between synonyms for certain objects, and this can be fallible, especially for the more obscure objects.  ADS is generally more accurate in the following sense - SIMBAD may quote a spectral type, but to be sure that whatever object you are looking at really has that type, track down the original papers and make sure that the actual original paper really does cite that type.  More obscure papers are rarely in SIMBAD, but they can be found in ADS.  ADS and SIMBAD are heavily interlinked, so there's a lot of ways to get between them. [END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Dewolf|Dewolf]] 22 Jan 2008 10:19:06 (question submitted via regular email): I'd seen some images [before] with the large pixel areas as well. How do you find a potential IRAS source in a small LDN with such poor resolution? [END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 10:19, 22 January 2008 (PST): &lt;br /&gt;
Your question really has a two-part answer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first part is that I'm not detecting sources by eye.  I'm relying upon the computer-generated IRAS Point Source Catalog (PSC) and Faint Source Catalog (FSC) which are described along with the rest of the IRAS mission&lt;br /&gt;
information here: http://irsa.ipac.caltech.edu/IRASdocs/iras.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you get into the documentation, you will find that the catalog consists of, among other things, measurements at each of the 4 IRAS wavelengths, and a quality flag for each of the 4 bands.  This quality flag is REALLY&lt;br /&gt;
IMPORTANT, as it tells us whether the computer thought it was a real detection at each band, or just an upper limit at a particular band. Because the resolution of IRAS is so poor, indeed, it can be fooled.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the objects in our shortlist below really did have a recognizable clear point source right on the center of the object at 25 um. But, the rest, I agree, I'd be hard-pressed to identify the source by eye. That doesn't mean it's not there, however.  The computer is really good at finding real, faint sources.  When we go to write this up, we really should pay attention to whether the computer felt it was a point source just at 100 um and not at 12 or 25 um.  For this subset of objects, I am cheating a little because several of them have observations at other wavelengths, enough so that I know there's a real source there, so I didn't go check the quality flags for those objects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The second aspect of the answer is that when we go look with Spitzer, it could very well be that the source dissolves away into background nebulosity, or breaks into pieces.  We have an image at 24 um of something in the Perseus star-forming region that appears in the IRAS catalog as a single object, IRAS 03388+3139.  But, when we look with Spitzer, it breaks up into 9 objects.  This stuff appeared in Rebull et al., 2007, ApJS, 171, 447 (also findable in astro-ph, look near Jan 2007), along with an analysis of what IRAS sources dissolved away completely into nebulosity when viewed with Spitzer.  The nebulosity is very complex here, so it happens.&lt;br /&gt;
[END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=A (The?) Shortlist=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Goal: find anywhere from one to a few LDN likely to host young stars so that we not only have a pretty picture but also find some new baby stars.  If we are going to ask for more than one cloud, they need to have different properties, so that we can explain that we are looking at THIS sort and THAT sort to compare.  And we can (should) also say we will mine the Spitzer archive for more examples.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Luisa's Favorites==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|LDN &lt;br /&gt;
|Image&lt;br /&gt;
|Notes&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|951 &lt;br /&gt;
|[[image:ldn951_possred.jpg]] (POSS/Red, 0.25 deg on side)&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
* from cris (see above.)&lt;br /&gt;
* opacity class 6 (good, deep and dark)&lt;br /&gt;
* 'linear' (as opposed to 'blobby')&lt;br /&gt;
* (Visser et al. 2002, AJ, 124, 2756) part of the cygnus rift, 700 pc away, max extinction Av=10, just 4.7 Msun in cloud&lt;br /&gt;
* IRAS source 21186+4320&lt;br /&gt;
* (ref?) two submm 'starless cores' here : in 1950 coordinates 21:18:20 +43:19:17 and 21:18:22.9 +43:19:51 -&amp;gt; we might not find anything, but we might find some of the youngest stars forming here.&lt;br /&gt;
* visible to spitzer through tomorrow 1/22 (argh!); next window june 27-sep 10.&lt;br /&gt;
*IRAC total time 907 sec, MIPS total time 3313 seconds.  IRAC: [[media:ldn951_withirac.gif]] (irac has two fields of view, portrayed by the two colors; the region covered by both colors is the region we'll get with all 4 irac bands [3.6, 4.5, 5.8, and 8 um].  note that the specific portion of sky that we will cover rotates, so these observations are designed to catch as much of the LDN as i can and still be independent of rotation angle.)  MIPS: [[media:ldn951_withmips.gif]] (MIPS has 3 cameras, but we're only using 2 -- indicated by the two colors, 24 and 70 um.  &lt;br /&gt;
* with irac we will see mostly stars, some nebulosity.  we need at least MIPS-24, which is 1191 seconds of the 3313 seconds; mips 24 will help us find stars, but also find the nebulosity.  in this specific case, where we have some submm cores, mips70 is important too, as it might be just at mips70 that we see these submm cores.  note that i get a little too much sky at 24 and not quite enough at 70; i'm constrained by the choices i have in the AOR construction, and i'm optimizing for science and time, not necessarily a pretty picture.&lt;br /&gt;
*TOTAL TIME: 1.2 hrs. (4 IRAC plus 2 MIPS)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|425&lt;br /&gt;
|[[image:ldn425_possred.gif]] (POSS/Red, 0.25 deg on side)&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:ldn425_mycenter_possred.gif]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
* from cris' ppt based on some subset of my target weeding.&lt;br /&gt;
* opacity class 5 (good, pretty deep and dark)&lt;br /&gt;
* 'blobby' (as opposed to 'linear')&lt;br /&gt;
* Lee and Myers (1999, ApJS, 123, 233) find a YSO here (1950 coords: 17 44 15.4	−04 34 07)&lt;br /&gt;
* IRAS source 17442−0433&lt;br /&gt;
* Connelley et al (2007 AJ 133, 1528) find a new NIR reflection nebula here, suggestive that a YSO is illuminating the nebula, and that we will see something pretty at IRAC bands.&lt;br /&gt;
* the part that is the center of the coordinates given by lynds (center of image at left) seems offset from the darkest part as seen in POSS. X's in graphic at left are the IRAS point sources in this region; the northernmost one is the one listed in the literature. there is not much to the dark cloud north of the image region shown at left.  I'm taking as the center 17:46:55 -04:36:25; see second graphic at left.&lt;br /&gt;
* visible to spitzer apr 12-may 23, then sep 21-nov 2.&lt;br /&gt;
* IRAC total time 657 seconds ([[media:ldn425_mycenter_possred_withirac.gif]]) MIPS-24 total time only 395 seconds. Harder to justify 70 um time too here, since it will be expensive and it's not entirely clear what we will see. Could simply plan to jump on the data right away and ask for more time to do 70 if it seems likely to be interesting. ([[media:ldn425_mycenter_possred_withmips.gif]] - box is &amp;quot;my center&amp;quot; for this observation and x's are IRAS sources.) &lt;br /&gt;
*TOTAL TIME: 0.3 hrs. (4 IRAC plus 1 MIPS)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|981&lt;br /&gt;
|[[image:ldn981_possred.gif]] (POSS/Red, 0.3 (not 0.25!) deg on side)&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
* from cris' ppt based on some subset of my target weeding.&lt;br /&gt;
* opacity class 6 (good, deep and dark)&lt;br /&gt;
* 'linear' (as opposed to 'blobby')&lt;br /&gt;
* Quanz et al. (2007, ApJ, 656, 287, also astro-ph/0610786 -- see http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0610786 for free copy of paper) has a very interesting article about the structures around V1331 Cyg, a known YSO.  They were studying the immediate environment of this thing using HST, but it is at the end of one of the filaments associated with LDN 981.  One of the questions they address in this paper is whether or not V1331 Cyg formed on its own, or with 'friends.'  They talk in their paper (see sections 4.2 and 4.3) about whether some objects found in the LDN black parts are real YSOs or not, and they conclude based on available evidence that they are not YSOs.  BUT, maybe they just weren't looking in long enough wavelengths.  We might find that these stars really are YSOs... or we may not.  We may confirm that yes, they are just foreground objects superimposed on the dark lanes of the nebula.   V1331 Cyg is just on the edge of the image, to the upper left, at the end of that dark lane, with the funny circular bright nebula (that was what Quanz et al studied with HST).&lt;br /&gt;
*[[media:timldn981.jpg| image from tim comparing more wavelengths]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[media:crisldn981.jpg| image from cris comparing scales]]&lt;br /&gt;
* visible to Spitzer through jan 27 (argh!), then june 26-feb 3 (not a typo, nice and long!)&lt;br /&gt;
* some existing MIPS data to the east (left) and north (up) which we could grab and add in to our maps.&lt;br /&gt;
* IRAC total time 2152 sec ([[media:ldn981_possred_withirac.gif]]) **need to add a constraint to both IRAC and MIPS that it be done before sep 15 (1 for MIPS) in order to cover the region we want. (usually constraints are bad, but i'd have to ask for more time otherwise, and we are giving them a large window, so it should be ok.) MIPS 24 only 1191 sec. ([[media:ldn981_possred_withmips24.gif]]) Again, somewhat hard to justify asking for 70 um time, but this time, V1331 Cyg is an IRAS source, so ''maybe'' worth it. MIPS-70 alone is another 6079 sec. (!) ([[media:ldn981_possred_withmips70.gif]])&lt;br /&gt;
*TOTAL TIME: 0.9 hrs (4 irac plus 1 mips) or 2.6 hrs (4 irac plus 2 mips)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1143&lt;br /&gt;
|[[image:ldn1143_possred.gif]] (POSS/Red, 0.3 deg on side - now spot won't let me do 0.25, ??)&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
* from cris' ppt based on some subset of my target weeding.&lt;br /&gt;
* opacity class 6 (good, deep and dark)&lt;br /&gt;
* 'blobby' (as opposed to 'linear')&lt;br /&gt;
* Lee and Myers (1999, ApJS, 123, 233) find a YSO here (1950 coords: 21 57 03.0	58 42 25)&lt;br /&gt;
* IRAS source 21569+5842&lt;br /&gt;
* Connelley et al. (2007 AJ 133, 1528) find a new NIR reflection nebula here, suggestive that a YSO is illuminating the nebula, and that we will see something pretty at IRAC bands.&lt;br /&gt;
* Magnier et al. (1999, A&amp;amp;A, 352, 228) find something they call a &amp;quot;transition object&amp;quot; here, and is noted specifically as a &amp;quot;very red star.&amp;quot; It's likely we will be better able to tell what this thing is.&lt;br /&gt;
* visible to Spitzer through feb 22 (too soon to schedule us) and then jul 23-mar 2 (again, not a typo, nice and long).&lt;br /&gt;
* IRAC total time 907 sec ([[media:ldn1143_possred_withirac.gif]] - box is 'target', x's are iras sources), MIPS-24 total time 1191 sec (just mips24, not mips70 too, again hard to justify) ([[media:ldn1143_possred_withmips24.gif]]).&lt;br /&gt;
* TOTAL TIME: 0.6 hrs (4 irac plus 1 mips)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1598&lt;br /&gt;
|[[image:ldn1598_possred.gif]] (POSS/Red, 0.3 deg on side - now spot won't let me do 0.25, ??) x's are IRAS sources&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
* from Tim based on some subset of my target weeding&lt;br /&gt;
* opacity class 5 (good, pretty deep and dark)&lt;br /&gt;
* 'blobby' (as opposed to 'linear')&lt;br /&gt;
* 19 refs in SIMBAD.  &lt;br /&gt;
* IRAS 05496+0812, also WB89 718, also HH 117 VLA 1 (so clearly several people have looked here before).  This is part of the lambda Ori complex, apparently, and maybe related to alpha Ori (Betelgeuse).  There is a lot of Spitzer data covering parts of the lambda Ori complex, but evidently not this cloud and its friend, L1599.  I will ask my friends who are studying the lambda Ori complex about this object.&lt;br /&gt;
* Wu et al. (2004, A&amp;amp;A, 426, 503) studied outflows and claim to find one here, placing the cloud at 0.9 kpc.  Another paper, Hilton &amp;amp; Lahulla (1995, A&amp;amp;AS, 113, 325) cite Schwartz et al (1988) also at 900 pc.&lt;br /&gt;
* Rodriguez &amp;amp; Reipurth (1998) find the exciting source for HH117 here; our observations as planned will also cover the HH object itself.&lt;br /&gt;
* visible to spitzer mar 21-apr 29, then oct 18-nov 28.&lt;br /&gt;
* IRAC total time 907 sec ([[media:ldn1598_possred_withirac.gif]] - box is 'target', x's are iras sources), MIPS-24 total time 1191 sec (just mips24, not mips70 too, again hard to justify) ([[media:ldn1598_possred_withmips24.gif]]).&lt;br /&gt;
* TOTAL TIME: 0.6 hrs (4 irac plus 1 mips)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1685&lt;br /&gt;
|[[image:ldn1685_possred.gif]] (POSS/Red, 0.25 deg on side)&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
* from Chelen based on some subset of my target weeding&lt;br /&gt;
* opacity class 5 (good, pretty deep and dark)&lt;br /&gt;
* 'blobby' (as opposed to 'linear')&lt;br /&gt;
* 10 references in SIMBAD; aliases include BHR 157, [CB88] 73, Barnard 56, DCld 352.9+04.8 &lt;br /&gt;
* Huard et al. (1999, ApJ, 526, 833) does NOT detect this in the submm, and is able to constrain the distance at &amp;lt;160 pc (in front of the ophiuchus clouds).&lt;br /&gt;
* I think it was also undetected by Bourke et al. (1995 MNRAS) in ammonia.&lt;br /&gt;
* there is an IRAS source here; see x's in figure to left. IRAS 17056-3204 is the one closest to the center.&lt;br /&gt;
* visible to spitzer apr 4-may 13 then sep 14-oct 24&lt;br /&gt;
* IRAC total time 907 sec ([[media:ldn1685_possred_withirac.gif]] - box is 'target', x's are iras sources), MIPS-24 total time 1191 sec (just mips24, not mips70 too, again hard to justify) ([[media:ldn1685_possred_withmips24.gif]]).&lt;br /&gt;
* TOTAL TIME: 0.6 hrs (4 irac plus 1 mips)&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
the AOR file to load into spot is here: [[media:lyndsaors.aor.txt]] - i had to add a &amp;quot;.txt&amp;quot; extension to get the wiki to accept it, but you should save the file to disk and rename it as just &amp;quot;.aor&amp;quot; and then Spot will recognize it as an AOR file.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Middle-of-the-road candidates==&lt;br /&gt;
Usually they're just here because there's no good reason to reject them, but others seem prettier or more likely to host stars.&lt;br /&gt;
*LDN 470 - small, opacity class=6.  &lt;br /&gt;
*LDN 1225 - bigger, opacity class 4 only (too thin?)&lt;br /&gt;
*LDN 1125 - opacity class=5, blotchy/blobby, same as Barnard 152, Lee and Myers say YSO but appears in 'starless core' papers.&lt;br /&gt;
*LDN 1139 - opacity class=5, blotchy/blobby, Lee and Myers say YSO but appears in 'starless core' papers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Rejects, and reasons:==&lt;br /&gt;
*LDN 880 - lee and myers say no YSO; rather thin in optical images, and might just see through it in spitzer.&lt;br /&gt;
*LDN 769 - lee and myers say no YSO; mentioned in several other &amp;quot;starless core&amp;quot; papers.&lt;br /&gt;
*LDN 778 - many simbad refs (&amp;gt;40!) but most of them are 'starless core' papers&lt;br /&gt;
*LDN 1041 - image looks like a plain star field&lt;br /&gt;
*LDN 1082 - image looks like a plain star field&lt;br /&gt;
*LDN 1340 - nice image, but consensus from the group was that they wanted to work in a 'new' region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Voting and Ranking=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the editing of the table in the wiki intimidates you, or you're worried about making sure your vote appears under your column (this can be tricky), feel free to just email me your ranking, and I'll enter it here.  &amp;quot;1&amp;quot; is high (most favorite), &amp;quot;6&amp;quot; is low (least favorite).  So as not to bias you, I won't put in my votes until the very end.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|LDN &lt;br /&gt;
|Pete&lt;br /&gt;
|Chelen&lt;br /&gt;
|David&lt;br /&gt;
|John&lt;br /&gt;
|Cris&lt;br /&gt;
|Tim&lt;br /&gt;
|Luisa&lt;br /&gt;
|AVERAGE&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|951 &lt;br /&gt;
|6&lt;br /&gt;
|5&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|4&lt;br /&gt;
|5&lt;br /&gt;
|5&lt;br /&gt;
|5&lt;br /&gt;
|'''4.4'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|425&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|3&lt;br /&gt;
|'''2.2'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|981&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|'''1.1'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1143&lt;br /&gt;
|3&lt;br /&gt;
|4&lt;br /&gt;
|3&lt;br /&gt;
|5&lt;br /&gt;
|3&lt;br /&gt;
|4&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|'''3.4'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1598&lt;br /&gt;
|4&lt;br /&gt;
|6&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|3&lt;br /&gt;
|4&lt;br /&gt;
|3&lt;br /&gt;
|4&lt;br /&gt;
|'''4.0'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1685&lt;br /&gt;
|5&lt;br /&gt;
|3&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|6&lt;br /&gt;
|6&lt;br /&gt;
|6&lt;br /&gt;
|6&lt;br /&gt;
|'''5.3'''&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rank-ordered list is therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
*LDN 981 (rank 1.1) - 0.9 hrs spitzer time&lt;br /&gt;
*LDN 425 (rank 2.2) - 0.3 hrs spitzer time&lt;br /&gt;
*LDN 1143 (rank 3.4) - 0.6 hrs spitzer time&lt;br /&gt;
*LDN 1598 (rank 4.0) - 0.6 hrs spitzer time&lt;br /&gt;
*LDN 951 (rank 4.4) - 1.2 hrs spitzer time&lt;br /&gt;
*LDN 1685 (rank 5.3) - 0.6 hrs spitzer time&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would counsel that you write a proposal for the top two clouds.  They have some different properties, and the total time request of 1.2 hrs is not completely outrageous.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Dewolf|Dewolf]] 08:54, 29 January 2008 (PST)The paper that Luisa referred to in her discussion of LDN 981 is worth a read as we prepare our proposal. Here is a direct link to a pdf of it [[media:0610786v1.pdf]]. The authors suggest that V1331 Cyg evolved from one of the filaments in this linear cloud. To me, this implies a strong possibility of additional YSOs in the cloud. What do you think? [END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 13:02, 30 January 2008 (PST) Yep, i think it's a strong possibility, but also look at the rest of the text i posted above in the entry for 981 :&lt;br /&gt;
   Quanz et al. (2007, ApJ, 656, 287, also astro-ph/0610786 -- see http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0610786 for free &lt;br /&gt;
  copy of paper) [...] One of the questions they address in this paper is whether or not V1331 Cyg formed on its own, &lt;br /&gt;
  or with 'friends.' They talk in their paper (see sections 4.2 and 4.3) about whether some objects found in the LDN &lt;br /&gt;
  black parts are real YSOs or not, and they conclude based on available evidence that they are not YSOs. BUT, maybe &lt;br /&gt;
  they just weren't looking in long enough wavelengths. We might find that these stars really are YSOs... or we may &lt;br /&gt;
  not. We may confirm that yes, they are just foreground objects superimposed on the dark lanes of the nebula.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:CJohnson|CJohnson]] 11:11, 21 April 2008 (CDT) &lt;br /&gt;
=Travel Arrangements=&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to e-mail me your travel arrangements, I would be happy to update this chart.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|LDN &lt;br /&gt;
|Pete&lt;br /&gt;
|Chelen&lt;br /&gt;
|David&lt;br /&gt;
|John&lt;br /&gt;
|Cris&lt;br /&gt;
|Tim&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Arrival date/time &lt;br /&gt;
|x&lt;br /&gt;
|13-June, 20:15&lt;br /&gt;
|x&lt;br /&gt;
|13-June, &lt;br /&gt;
|13-June&lt;br /&gt;
|x&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|# of students (male/female)&lt;br /&gt;
|x&lt;br /&gt;
|0/0&lt;br /&gt;
|1/2&lt;br /&gt;
|0/0&lt;br /&gt;
|2/0&lt;br /&gt;
|x&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Hotel**&lt;br /&gt;
|x&lt;br /&gt;
|HIE&lt;br /&gt;
|x&lt;br /&gt;
|X&lt;br /&gt;
|x&lt;br /&gt;
|x&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Auto rental??&lt;br /&gt;
|x&lt;br /&gt;
|no&lt;br /&gt;
|x&lt;br /&gt;
|no&lt;br /&gt;
|no&lt;br /&gt;
|van&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Departure date/time&lt;br /&gt;
|x&lt;br /&gt;
|18-June 7:15&lt;br /&gt;
|x&lt;br /&gt;
|18- June &lt;br /&gt;
|18-June&lt;br /&gt;
|x&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
**HIE=Holiday Inn Express-Pasadena, BW=Best Western Pasadena Royale &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Peace,&lt;br /&gt;
--chj&lt;br /&gt;
[END]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mcdonald</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://vmcoolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/index.php?title=I%27m_ready_to_move_on_to_more_%22advanced%22_color_composite_imaging_techniques.&amp;diff=3163</id>
		<title>I'm ready to move on to more &quot;advanced&quot; color composite imaging techniques.</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://vmcoolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/index.php?title=I%27m_ready_to_move_on_to_more_%22advanced%22_color_composite_imaging_techniques.&amp;diff=3163"/>
		<updated>2008-02-18T19:05:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mcdonald: /* THIS PAGE IS STILL UNDER DEVELOPMENT... we're working on it */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== THIS PAGE IS STILL UNDER DEVELOPMENT... we're working on it ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Classroom activity packet from David W. McDonald, Joy-Lyn McDonald and Micah McDonald: &amp;quot;Making pretty pictures: How Astronomers make images&amp;quot; : [[media:mcdonald_images_3.9c.pdf | download pdf here]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Mcdonald|Mcdonald]] 11:04, 18 February 2008 (PST)   Please use the new version mcdonald_images_4.0.pdf:&lt;br /&gt;
   [[Media:mcdonald_images_4.0.pdf]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Image processing resources for astronomy teaching http://www.phy.duke.edu/~kolena/imagepro.html&lt;br /&gt;
notice in particular the pointer to tips for doing x-ray analysis with ds9: http://chandra-ed.harvard.edu/activities.html&lt;br /&gt;
once we feel that our site is ready for &amp;quot;prime time&amp;quot;, we should tell him about this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*FITS liberator http://www.spacetelescope.org/projects/fits_liberator/&lt;br /&gt;
*short guide to image processing http://www.spacetelescope.org/projects/fits_liberator/improc.html&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mcdonald</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://vmcoolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/index.php?title=I%27m_ready_to_move_on_to_more_%22advanced%22_color_composite_imaging_techniques.&amp;diff=3162</id>
		<title>I'm ready to move on to more &quot;advanced&quot; color composite imaging techniques.</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://vmcoolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/index.php?title=I%27m_ready_to_move_on_to_more_%22advanced%22_color_composite_imaging_techniques.&amp;diff=3162"/>
		<updated>2008-02-18T19:04:45Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mcdonald: /* THIS PAGE IS STILL UNDER DEVELOPMENT... we're working on it */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== THIS PAGE IS STILL UNDER DEVELOPMENT... we're working on it ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Classroom activity packet from David W. McDonald, Joy-Lyn McDonald and Micah McDonald: &amp;quot;Making pretty pictures: How Astronomers make images&amp;quot; : [[media:mcdonald_images_3.9c.pdf | download pdf here]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Mcdonald|Mcdonald]] 11:04, 18 February 2008 (PST)   Please use the new version mcdonald_images_4.0.pdf:&lt;br /&gt;
   [[Media:mcdonald_images_4.0.pdf] | Download pdf here]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Image processing resources for astronomy teaching http://www.phy.duke.edu/~kolena/imagepro.html&lt;br /&gt;
notice in particular the pointer to tips for doing x-ray analysis with ds9: http://chandra-ed.harvard.edu/activities.html&lt;br /&gt;
once we feel that our site is ready for &amp;quot;prime time&amp;quot;, we should tell him about this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*FITS liberator http://www.spacetelescope.org/projects/fits_liberator/&lt;br /&gt;
*short guide to image processing http://www.spacetelescope.org/projects/fits_liberator/improc.html&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mcdonald</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://vmcoolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/index.php?title=Misc._Lesson_Plans,_Activities,_and_Useful_Websites&amp;diff=3161</id>
		<title>Misc. Lesson Plans, Activities, and Useful Websites</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://vmcoolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/index.php?title=Misc._Lesson_Plans,_Activities,_and_Useful_Websites&amp;diff=3161"/>
		<updated>2008-02-18T18:49:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mcdonald: /* Lesson Plans/Activities */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=Lesson Plans/Activities=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Classroom activity packet from David W. McDonald, Joy-Lyn McDonald and Micah McDonald: &amp;quot;Making pretty pictures: How Astronomers make images&amp;quot; : [[media:mcdonald_images_3.9c.pdf | download pdf here]] (version 3.9c)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Mcdonald|Mcdonald]] 10:42, 18 February 2008 (PST)   Please use the newer version 4.0:&lt;br /&gt;
   [[media:mcdonald_images_4.0.pdf | Download pdf HERE]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please feel free to add in your contributions here or elsewhere on the wiki!&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mcdonald</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://vmcoolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/index.php?title=File:Mcdonald_images_4.0.pdf&amp;diff=3160</id>
		<title>File:Mcdonald images 4.0.pdf</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://vmcoolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/index.php?title=File:Mcdonald_images_4.0.pdf&amp;diff=3160"/>
		<updated>2008-02-18T18:44:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mcdonald: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mcdonald</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://vmcoolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/index.php?title=Misc._Lesson_Plans,_Activities,_and_Useful_Websites&amp;diff=3159</id>
		<title>Misc. Lesson Plans, Activities, and Useful Websites</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://vmcoolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/index.php?title=Misc._Lesson_Plans,_Activities,_and_Useful_Websites&amp;diff=3159"/>
		<updated>2008-02-18T18:42:33Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mcdonald: /* Lesson Plans/Activities */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=Lesson Plans/Activities=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Classroom activity packet from David W. McDonald, Joy-Lyn McDonald and Micah McDonald: &amp;quot;Making pretty pictures: How Astronomers make images&amp;quot; : [[media:mcdonald_images_3.9c.pdf | download pdf here]] (version 3.9c)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Mcdonald|Mcdonald]] 10:42, 18 February 2008 (PST)   Please use the newer version 4.0:&lt;br /&gt;
   [[media:mcdonald_images_4.0.pdf | download pdf HERE]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please feel free to add in your contributions here or elsewhere on the wiki!&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mcdonald</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://vmcoolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/index.php?title=File:Ldnlistingver2.xls&amp;diff=3136</id>
		<title>File:Ldnlistingver2.xls</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://vmcoolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/index.php?title=File:Ldnlistingver2.xls&amp;diff=3136"/>
		<updated>2008-01-25T20:11:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mcdonald: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mcdonald</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://vmcoolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/index.php?title=Talk:Lynds_Target_Selection&amp;diff=3135</id>
		<title>Talk:Lynds Target Selection</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://vmcoolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/index.php?title=Talk:Lynds_Target_Selection&amp;diff=3135"/>
		<updated>2008-01-25T20:09:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mcdonald: /* Headline text */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Headline text ==&lt;br /&gt;
Hi All,&lt;br /&gt;
I've been checking pic's and last reported on LND's and I think these are good selections...not much written on LDN 880. I agree with Rebull that LDN 880. I think we should consider...LDN 1225 next choice. I am looking forward to talking to ya tomorrow. I will have leopard up and coolwiki.&lt;br /&gt;
John&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Schaefers|Schaefers]] 17:52, 20 January 2008 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
Dear All&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry about the mess at the bottom.&lt;br /&gt;
I will email the Excel file&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
later&lt;br /&gt;
david&lt;br /&gt;
Dear All&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ok so I deleted bad formated data below and will try posting the excel file.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
later&lt;br /&gt;
david&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dear Lynds&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I hope you all made it home safe and sound.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wednesday night as I was driving home the sky was GREAT.  Very dark and the&lt;br /&gt;
Milky Way sure stood out.  I looked but did not see any nebula.  :)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using http://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov I did a search and got a list of Lynds nebula&lt;br /&gt;
with ra, dec, cloud area in degrees squared and rating of opacity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I placed list on excel and sorted by opacity and then area.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hopefully the list will be below for all 6 and 5 lens nebula.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does any one know about what area we can look at in 1 hour?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
later&lt;br /&gt;
david&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
name, ra, dec, cloud area (degree squared), area in arcmin squared I think,&lt;br /&gt;
opacity&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 53	17 23 08.90	-23 54 47.2	0.001	3.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 --[[User:Mcdonald|Mcdonald]] 16:04, 14 January 2008 (PST)   Hi is all goes well this is the excel file:&lt;br /&gt;
   [[Media:ldnlisting.xls]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Mcdonald|Mcdonald]] 12:08, 25 January 2008 (PST)   Here is the up dated excel file if anyone is interested:&lt;br /&gt;
   [[Media:ldnlistingver2.xls]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mcdonald</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://vmcoolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/index.php?title=Talk:Lynds_Target_Selection&amp;diff=3134</id>
		<title>Talk:Lynds Target Selection</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://vmcoolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/index.php?title=Talk:Lynds_Target_Selection&amp;diff=3134"/>
		<updated>2008-01-25T20:08:24Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mcdonald: /* Headline text */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Headline text ==&lt;br /&gt;
Hi All,&lt;br /&gt;
I've been checking pic's and last reported on LND's and I think these are good selections...not much written on LDN 880. I agree with Rebull that LDN 880. I think we should consider...LDN 1225 next choice. I am looking forward to talking to ya tomorrow. I will have leopard up and coolwiki.&lt;br /&gt;
John&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Schaefers|Schaefers]] 17:52, 20 January 2008 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
Dear All&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry about the mess at the bottom.&lt;br /&gt;
I will email the Excel file&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
later&lt;br /&gt;
david&lt;br /&gt;
Dear All&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ok so I deleted bad formated data below and will try posting the excel file.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
later&lt;br /&gt;
david&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dear Lynds&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I hope you all made it home safe and sound.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wednesday night as I was driving home the sky was GREAT.  Very dark and the&lt;br /&gt;
Milky Way sure stood out.  I looked but did not see any nebula.  :)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using http://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov I did a search and got a list of Lynds nebula&lt;br /&gt;
with ra, dec, cloud area in degrees squared and rating of opacity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I placed list on excel and sorted by opacity and then area.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hopefully the list will be below for all 6 and 5 lens nebula.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does any one know about what area we can look at in 1 hour?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
later&lt;br /&gt;
david&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
name, ra, dec, cloud area (degree squared), area in arcmin squared I think,&lt;br /&gt;
opacity&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 53	17 23 08.90	-23 54 47.2	0.001	3.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 --[[User:Mcdonald|Mcdonald]] 16:04, 14 January 2008 (PST)   Hi is all goes well this is the excel file:&lt;br /&gt;
   [[Media:ldnlisting.xls]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Mcdonald|Mcdonald]] 12:08, 25 January 2008 (PST)   Here is the up dated excel file if anyone is interested:&lt;br /&gt;
   [[Media:ldnlisting.xls]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mcdonald</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://vmcoolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/index.php?title=File:Ldn951.jpg&amp;diff=3011</id>
		<title>File:Ldn951.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://vmcoolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/index.php?title=File:Ldn951.jpg&amp;diff=3011"/>
		<updated>2008-01-15T23:55:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mcdonald: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mcdonald</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://vmcoolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/index.php?title=Lynds_Target_Selection&amp;diff=3010</id>
		<title>Lynds Target Selection</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://vmcoolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/index.php?title=Lynds_Target_Selection&amp;diff=3010"/>
		<updated>2008-01-15T23:54:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mcdonald: /* LDN 951 */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I haven't done this legwork yet because I thought you might want to be involved - finding a good target for observation is a substantial part of doing science! :)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ideally, we'd pick a target for our observation using a combination of &lt;br /&gt;
*'''searching [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abstract_service.html ADS] and/or [http://simbad.u-strasbg.fr/simbad/ SIMBAD] for existing literature''' .... we want something that doesn't have a LOT of other references, but some references are fine - if someone else has already assembled data on an object, we might be able to use those data and/or results - we just don't want something that has already been &amp;quot;done to death.&amp;quot;  ([[How_can_I_find_out_what_scientists_already_know_about_a_particular_astronomy_topic_or_object%3F|page from the wiki on literature searching]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''checking POSS and other existing multi-wavelength data to see what the object looks like in those bands''' .... does it look thick and dark in the optical?  bright in the infrared?  Both of those things suggest that it will be interesting with Spitzer.  Something that looks diaphanous in the optical will likely turn out to be completely transparent with Spitzer. ([[How_can_I_get_data_from_other_wavelengths_to_compare_with_infrared_data_from_Spitzer%3F|page from the wiki on introduction to data at other wavelengths]]; you can also do this with Leopard -- see next item.)&lt;br /&gt;
*and, '''checking to see if it is or is not in the Spitzer archive''' .... you need to use Leopard to do this. ([[How_do_I_download_data_from_the_Spitzer_Telescope%3F|page from the wiki on searching the archive using Leopard]]-- NB: &amp;quot;searching the archive to see what is there&amp;quot; is the same thing as &amp;quot;downloading data&amp;quot; except that when you search to see what is there, you don't actually download the data, you just see that there is something there.)  Also, note that just because there is data already in the Archive on a given cloud doesn't mean it's a BAD thing, just that it's not a good thing for a new proposal.  You should make a note of the &amp;quot;nice&amp;quot; ones you find, because you can go grab the data as soon as the data are public.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My original thoughts on good targets were the following three:&lt;br /&gt;
*LDN 470&lt;br /&gt;
*LDN 1225&lt;br /&gt;
*LDN 880  (but maybe too diaphanous)&lt;br /&gt;
And, at the AAS, you guys also came up with&lt;br /&gt;
*LDN 1340&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=General information re: lists of targets=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The master list of objects that I worked from is [[lyndslist.txt|here]], courtesy of Babar Ali.  Note that these are all opacity class 5 objects.  Opacity class 5 or higher is what we probably want for Spitzer observations.  None of these have many references in ADS.  '''This is not meant to be a comprehensive list''' by any means, just a place to start.  If you want to instead start with the complete Lynds Dark Nebulae catalog, it's [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996yCat.7007....0L here] (the data are linked as &amp;quot;online data&amp;quot; or something similar).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please post your thoughts and reactions to each of these targets, and any new ones you think are viable candidates for observation.  For example, you might post a gif or jpeg of the POSS image you found, or a summary list of references (e.g., &amp;quot;3 papers besides Lynds, one radio, others submm&amp;quot; or whatever).  Note the syntax I'm using to post comments on LDN 1340 below -- this is a method suggested by the Oil City folks, and I think it works really well to follow the conversation.  See the help page linked from the left (above the search box) for hints on how do this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Guastella|Guastella]] 20:48, 8 January 2008 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
Here is the article I mentioned in our meeting earlier today. ''(this is the one that looked in radio at optically-selected cores and reported which ones were &amp;quot;empty.&amp;quot;'')&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
THE ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL SUPPLEMENT SERIES, 123:233È250, 1999 July&lt;br /&gt;
(1999. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in U.S.A.&lt;br /&gt;
A CATALOG OF OPTICALLY SELECTED CORES&lt;br /&gt;
CHANG WON LEE AND PHILIP C. MYERS&lt;br /&gt;
[...]&lt;br /&gt;
This didn't format well.  Please let me know if there is a better way to send papers&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks&lt;br /&gt;
Pete [END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 09:25, 9 January 2008 (PST) he's right, this didn't format well, so I replaced it with a link directly to ADS, from which you can get the complete article - there's no access restrictions on it, and if you go there, you can get the originally formatted PDF or the html.  [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJS..123..233L ADS link to the Lee and Myers paper] [END] )&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 13:44, 14 January 2008 (PST) David added some general target selection stuff to the [https://coolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/index.php/Talk:Lynds_Target_Selection talk page] [END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Observing time=&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 13:59, 14 January 2008 (PST) David asked re: time to cover area.&lt;br /&gt;
A map I have here that goes about the depth we want covers about 0.6deg x0.6 deg with IRAC takes 1.5 hrs, and more or less the same area takes another 1.4 hrs with MIPS.  3 hrs is probably too much to ask for, especially if you want to ask for more than one cloud.  less than that size, 0.3 deg x 0.3 deg, with IRAC takes 0.4 hrs, and up to 0.7 hrs with MIPS. (i can get clever and try to make that less time, but this is the lowest-energy solution.)  For an irregularly-sized thing like LDN 951, i can get creative and make something other than a square map, but it takes longer for me to design.&lt;br /&gt;
so we need to decide if '''(a) we have something really cool we want to completely map, or (b) two smaller things (could be pieces of a large thing) we want to map to compare them.'''&lt;br /&gt;
Note that, for example, the object LDN 1340 is more like ~1 degree x ~1 degree, so we'd have to do just a small piece (or two small pieces) of it.&lt;br /&gt;
[END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=LDN 470=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:ldn470possred.gif]]  LDN 470 in POSS-red.  image is 0.25 deg on a side. --[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 14:09, 14 January 2008 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 --[[User:Mcdonald|Mcdonald]] 15:39, 15 January 2008 (PST)   Hi, here is a colored image of LDN 470:&lt;br /&gt;
   [[Image:ldn470.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=LDN 1225=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:ldn1225possred.gif]]  LDN 1225 in POSS-red.  image is 0.25 deg on a side. --[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 14:09, 14 January 2008 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 --[[User:Mcdonald|Mcdonald]] 15:44, 15 January 2008 (PST)   Here is a 15 arcmin x 15 arcmin colored image of ldn1225:&lt;br /&gt;
   [[Image:ldn1225.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=LDN 880=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:ldn880possred.gif |left]]  LDN 880 in POSS-red.  image is 0.25 deg on a side.   Still a little worried that this is too optically thin to make a good Spitzer image.  but maybe we could focus very specifically on the dark thing to the southwest. &lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 14:09, 14 January 2008 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:deepi.png]] [[image:deepr.png]] - LDN 880, about the same scale, in relatively deep I and R from the USNO 1.0m.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 14:43, 14 January 2008 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 --[[User:Mcdonald|Mcdonald]] 15:47, 15 January 2008 (PST)   Here is John's colored image made in Austin again 15 x 15 arcmin:&lt;br /&gt;
   [[Image:LDN880 by John.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=LDN 1340=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:ldn1340possred.gif|left]]  LDN 1340 in POSS-red.  image is 0.25 deg on a side. --[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 14:09, 14 January 2008 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 20:14, 8 January 2008 (PST)  Here's a summary of the latest developments on this object:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of you (Peter?) suggested this object - and it was a fabulous suggestion.  Beautiful in the optical, with IRAS sources, a handful of existing literature, and no Spitzer. Perfect!  The icing on the cake was that it's visible in the Spring.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of you (Peter again?) noticed that there was another AAS poster from 2005 on this object.  I mentioned that I knew 2 of the authors (JoAnn O'Linger and Grace Wolf-Chase).  Not 2 hours after leaving you, I ran into them.  One thing I didn't mention in the context of searching the archive is that there is an open call for proposals out now, eg., there are ~700 proposals for objects that are currently being reviewed, and 20% of them will get their targets approved by March.  To some extent, since you're putting in a proposal more or less now, you kind of trump them.  On the other hand, it's never good to make enemies....  So, it turns out that JoAnn and collaborators have submitted a proposal to map this region over 1 square degree.  There's no guarantee that their data will actually be taken this cycle (before we run out of cryogen in Spring 2009), but at the same time, we probably won't be able to ask for a full square degree (it would take too much time).  We could pick a subregion to focus on, or we could find another target entirely.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'll continue to talk to JoAnn (we had just a brief conversation today), and if I can get her posters (one from before, one from this meeting!), I'll post them here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Guastella|Guastella]] 20:48, 8 January 2008 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
In case we are still looking at this here is the 2005 Abstract&lt;br /&gt;
Submillimetre Observations of an Intermediate-Mass Star Forming Cloud Core J. O’Linger, G. H. Moriarty-&lt;br /&gt;
Schieven, and G. A. Wolf-Chase&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005AAS...20718413O ADS link to AAS abstract]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005prpl.conf.8600O ADS link to PPV abstract]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 09:37, 9 January 2008 (PST) I talked to JoAnn again today, and she thinks that maybe doing just a piece of the cloud would be a good idea.  She showed me some of her supporting data, and indeed this is a really cool area. We could do just a part of it now, and eventually, she'll map the rest of the cloud as well.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's her poster from today: [[Media:joann2008poster.pdf]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[END]&lt;br /&gt;
 --[[User:Mcdonald|Mcdonald]] 15:51, 15 January 2008 (PST)   15 x 15 colored image:&lt;br /&gt;
   [[Image:ldn1340.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=LDN 951=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From:   cdewolf@chsd.us&lt;br /&gt;
How does LDN 951 look? Assuming I did my query right, it also hasn't been looked at by Spitzer. I found it on a list of LDNs that have visual opacities of 6 in a paper by Visser et. al, 2002. There's another, but it doesn't look as interesting.&lt;br /&gt;
Cris L. DeWolf&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:LDN951.red.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 14:00, 9 January 2008 (PST) ooh, this is a nice one!  you're right, it doesn't have any Spitzer observations yet.  This might very well be a good candidate!  [END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Dewolf|Dewolf]] 06:00, 12 January 2008 (PST)There was a study of IRAS associations with dark clouds (Parker, N.D., 1988) that appears to indicate a good chance of there being a YSO in LDN 951. Here's a link to the article.&lt;br /&gt;
[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1988MNRAS.235..139P&amp;amp;db_key=AST&amp;amp;link_type=ABSTRACT&amp;amp;high=4788c3397d22375]&lt;br /&gt;
[END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 --[[User:Mcdonald|Mcdonald]] 15:54, 15 January 2008 (PST)   A 15 x 15 arcmin colored image:&lt;br /&gt;
   [[Image:ldn951.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Other targets=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 11:42, 9 January 2008 (PST) I found two posters today on Lynds clouds - L1221 and L988e.  L1221 has Spitzer data which is pretty cool; L988 doesn't have any Spitzer data.  Take a look at the other bands and references and see if it would be interesting....&lt;br /&gt;
[END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 14:09, 14 January 2008 (PST) nevermind; the L988 image is pretty much just a star field. [END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:l1014.jpg|left]]&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 14:27, 14 January 2008 (PST) just for comparison, here is a spitzer composite image of L1014. we'd be very lucky to find something like this, but this is the hope. [END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 13:44, 14 January 2008 (PST) David added some general target selection stuff to the [https://coolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/index.php/Talk:Lynds_Target_Selection talk page] [END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 10:48, 15 January 2008 (PST) Out of David's top 16 suggestions, the only ones wihtout existing spitzer data are ldn   &lt;br /&gt;
1357 (right on the edge of some existing spitzer data) and ldn 1358.  you must be doing something right, as you're hitting popular objects. ;)   [END]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mcdonald</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://vmcoolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/index.php?title=File:Ldn1340.jpg&amp;diff=3009</id>
		<title>File:Ldn1340.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://vmcoolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/index.php?title=File:Ldn1340.jpg&amp;diff=3009"/>
		<updated>2008-01-15T23:53:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mcdonald: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mcdonald</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://vmcoolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/index.php?title=Lynds_Target_Selection&amp;diff=3008</id>
		<title>Lynds Target Selection</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://vmcoolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/index.php?title=Lynds_Target_Selection&amp;diff=3008"/>
		<updated>2008-01-15T23:51:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mcdonald: /* LDN 1340 */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I haven't done this legwork yet because I thought you might want to be involved - finding a good target for observation is a substantial part of doing science! :)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ideally, we'd pick a target for our observation using a combination of &lt;br /&gt;
*'''searching [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abstract_service.html ADS] and/or [http://simbad.u-strasbg.fr/simbad/ SIMBAD] for existing literature''' .... we want something that doesn't have a LOT of other references, but some references are fine - if someone else has already assembled data on an object, we might be able to use those data and/or results - we just don't want something that has already been &amp;quot;done to death.&amp;quot;  ([[How_can_I_find_out_what_scientists_already_know_about_a_particular_astronomy_topic_or_object%3F|page from the wiki on literature searching]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''checking POSS and other existing multi-wavelength data to see what the object looks like in those bands''' .... does it look thick and dark in the optical?  bright in the infrared?  Both of those things suggest that it will be interesting with Spitzer.  Something that looks diaphanous in the optical will likely turn out to be completely transparent with Spitzer. ([[How_can_I_get_data_from_other_wavelengths_to_compare_with_infrared_data_from_Spitzer%3F|page from the wiki on introduction to data at other wavelengths]]; you can also do this with Leopard -- see next item.)&lt;br /&gt;
*and, '''checking to see if it is or is not in the Spitzer archive''' .... you need to use Leopard to do this. ([[How_do_I_download_data_from_the_Spitzer_Telescope%3F|page from the wiki on searching the archive using Leopard]]-- NB: &amp;quot;searching the archive to see what is there&amp;quot; is the same thing as &amp;quot;downloading data&amp;quot; except that when you search to see what is there, you don't actually download the data, you just see that there is something there.)  Also, note that just because there is data already in the Archive on a given cloud doesn't mean it's a BAD thing, just that it's not a good thing for a new proposal.  You should make a note of the &amp;quot;nice&amp;quot; ones you find, because you can go grab the data as soon as the data are public.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My original thoughts on good targets were the following three:&lt;br /&gt;
*LDN 470&lt;br /&gt;
*LDN 1225&lt;br /&gt;
*LDN 880  (but maybe too diaphanous)&lt;br /&gt;
And, at the AAS, you guys also came up with&lt;br /&gt;
*LDN 1340&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=General information re: lists of targets=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The master list of objects that I worked from is [[lyndslist.txt|here]], courtesy of Babar Ali.  Note that these are all opacity class 5 objects.  Opacity class 5 or higher is what we probably want for Spitzer observations.  None of these have many references in ADS.  '''This is not meant to be a comprehensive list''' by any means, just a place to start.  If you want to instead start with the complete Lynds Dark Nebulae catalog, it's [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996yCat.7007....0L here] (the data are linked as &amp;quot;online data&amp;quot; or something similar).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please post your thoughts and reactions to each of these targets, and any new ones you think are viable candidates for observation.  For example, you might post a gif or jpeg of the POSS image you found, or a summary list of references (e.g., &amp;quot;3 papers besides Lynds, one radio, others submm&amp;quot; or whatever).  Note the syntax I'm using to post comments on LDN 1340 below -- this is a method suggested by the Oil City folks, and I think it works really well to follow the conversation.  See the help page linked from the left (above the search box) for hints on how do this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Guastella|Guastella]] 20:48, 8 January 2008 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
Here is the article I mentioned in our meeting earlier today. ''(this is the one that looked in radio at optically-selected cores and reported which ones were &amp;quot;empty.&amp;quot;'')&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
THE ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL SUPPLEMENT SERIES, 123:233È250, 1999 July&lt;br /&gt;
(1999. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in U.S.A.&lt;br /&gt;
A CATALOG OF OPTICALLY SELECTED CORES&lt;br /&gt;
CHANG WON LEE AND PHILIP C. MYERS&lt;br /&gt;
[...]&lt;br /&gt;
This didn't format well.  Please let me know if there is a better way to send papers&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks&lt;br /&gt;
Pete [END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 09:25, 9 January 2008 (PST) he's right, this didn't format well, so I replaced it with a link directly to ADS, from which you can get the complete article - there's no access restrictions on it, and if you go there, you can get the originally formatted PDF or the html.  [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJS..123..233L ADS link to the Lee and Myers paper] [END] )&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 13:44, 14 January 2008 (PST) David added some general target selection stuff to the [https://coolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/index.php/Talk:Lynds_Target_Selection talk page] [END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Observing time=&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 13:59, 14 January 2008 (PST) David asked re: time to cover area.&lt;br /&gt;
A map I have here that goes about the depth we want covers about 0.6deg x0.6 deg with IRAC takes 1.5 hrs, and more or less the same area takes another 1.4 hrs with MIPS.  3 hrs is probably too much to ask for, especially if you want to ask for more than one cloud.  less than that size, 0.3 deg x 0.3 deg, with IRAC takes 0.4 hrs, and up to 0.7 hrs with MIPS. (i can get clever and try to make that less time, but this is the lowest-energy solution.)  For an irregularly-sized thing like LDN 951, i can get creative and make something other than a square map, but it takes longer for me to design.&lt;br /&gt;
so we need to decide if '''(a) we have something really cool we want to completely map, or (b) two smaller things (could be pieces of a large thing) we want to map to compare them.'''&lt;br /&gt;
Note that, for example, the object LDN 1340 is more like ~1 degree x ~1 degree, so we'd have to do just a small piece (or two small pieces) of it.&lt;br /&gt;
[END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=LDN 470=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:ldn470possred.gif]]  LDN 470 in POSS-red.  image is 0.25 deg on a side. --[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 14:09, 14 January 2008 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 --[[User:Mcdonald|Mcdonald]] 15:39, 15 January 2008 (PST)   Hi, here is a colored image of LDN 470:&lt;br /&gt;
   [[Image:ldn470.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=LDN 1225=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:ldn1225possred.gif]]  LDN 1225 in POSS-red.  image is 0.25 deg on a side. --[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 14:09, 14 January 2008 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 --[[User:Mcdonald|Mcdonald]] 15:44, 15 January 2008 (PST)   Here is a 15 arcmin x 15 arcmin colored image of ldn1225:&lt;br /&gt;
   [[Image:ldn1225.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=LDN 880=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:ldn880possred.gif |left]]  LDN 880 in POSS-red.  image is 0.25 deg on a side.   Still a little worried that this is too optically thin to make a good Spitzer image.  but maybe we could focus very specifically on the dark thing to the southwest. &lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 14:09, 14 January 2008 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:deepi.png]] [[image:deepr.png]] - LDN 880, about the same scale, in relatively deep I and R from the USNO 1.0m.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 14:43, 14 January 2008 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 --[[User:Mcdonald|Mcdonald]] 15:47, 15 January 2008 (PST)   Here is John's colored image made in Austin again 15 x 15 arcmin:&lt;br /&gt;
   [[Image:LDN880 by John.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=LDN 1340=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:ldn1340possred.gif|left]]  LDN 1340 in POSS-red.  image is 0.25 deg on a side. --[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 14:09, 14 January 2008 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 20:14, 8 January 2008 (PST)  Here's a summary of the latest developments on this object:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of you (Peter?) suggested this object - and it was a fabulous suggestion.  Beautiful in the optical, with IRAS sources, a handful of existing literature, and no Spitzer. Perfect!  The icing on the cake was that it's visible in the Spring.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of you (Peter again?) noticed that there was another AAS poster from 2005 on this object.  I mentioned that I knew 2 of the authors (JoAnn O'Linger and Grace Wolf-Chase).  Not 2 hours after leaving you, I ran into them.  One thing I didn't mention in the context of searching the archive is that there is an open call for proposals out now, eg., there are ~700 proposals for objects that are currently being reviewed, and 20% of them will get their targets approved by March.  To some extent, since you're putting in a proposal more or less now, you kind of trump them.  On the other hand, it's never good to make enemies....  So, it turns out that JoAnn and collaborators have submitted a proposal to map this region over 1 square degree.  There's no guarantee that their data will actually be taken this cycle (before we run out of cryogen in Spring 2009), but at the same time, we probably won't be able to ask for a full square degree (it would take too much time).  We could pick a subregion to focus on, or we could find another target entirely.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'll continue to talk to JoAnn (we had just a brief conversation today), and if I can get her posters (one from before, one from this meeting!), I'll post them here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Guastella|Guastella]] 20:48, 8 January 2008 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
In case we are still looking at this here is the 2005 Abstract&lt;br /&gt;
Submillimetre Observations of an Intermediate-Mass Star Forming Cloud Core J. O’Linger, G. H. Moriarty-&lt;br /&gt;
Schieven, and G. A. Wolf-Chase&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005AAS...20718413O ADS link to AAS abstract]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005prpl.conf.8600O ADS link to PPV abstract]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 09:37, 9 January 2008 (PST) I talked to JoAnn again today, and she thinks that maybe doing just a piece of the cloud would be a good idea.  She showed me some of her supporting data, and indeed this is a really cool area. We could do just a part of it now, and eventually, she'll map the rest of the cloud as well.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's her poster from today: [[Media:joann2008poster.pdf]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[END]&lt;br /&gt;
 --[[User:Mcdonald|Mcdonald]] 15:51, 15 January 2008 (PST)   15 x 15 colored image:&lt;br /&gt;
   [[Image:ldn1340.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=LDN 951=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From:   cdewolf@chsd.us&lt;br /&gt;
How does LDN 951 look? Assuming I did my query right, it also hasn't been looked at by Spitzer. I found it on a list of LDNs that have visual opacities of 6 in a paper by Visser et. al, 2002. There's another, but it doesn't look as interesting.&lt;br /&gt;
Cris L. DeWolf&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:LDN951.red.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 14:00, 9 January 2008 (PST) ooh, this is a nice one!  you're right, it doesn't have any Spitzer observations yet.  This might very well be a good candidate!  [END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Dewolf|Dewolf]] 06:00, 12 January 2008 (PST)There was a study of IRAS associations with dark clouds (Parker, N.D., 1988) that appears to indicate a good chance of there being a YSO in LDN 951. Here's a link to the article.&lt;br /&gt;
[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1988MNRAS.235..139P&amp;amp;db_key=AST&amp;amp;link_type=ABSTRACT&amp;amp;high=4788c3397d22375]&lt;br /&gt;
[END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Other targets=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 11:42, 9 January 2008 (PST) I found two posters today on Lynds clouds - L1221 and L988e.  L1221 has Spitzer data which is pretty cool; L988 doesn't have any Spitzer data.  Take a look at the other bands and references and see if it would be interesting....&lt;br /&gt;
[END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 14:09, 14 January 2008 (PST) nevermind; the L988 image is pretty much just a star field. [END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:l1014.jpg|left]]&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 14:27, 14 January 2008 (PST) just for comparison, here is a spitzer composite image of L1014. we'd be very lucky to find something like this, but this is the hope. [END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 13:44, 14 January 2008 (PST) David added some general target selection stuff to the [https://coolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/index.php/Talk:Lynds_Target_Selection talk page] [END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 10:48, 15 January 2008 (PST) Out of David's top 16 suggestions, the only ones wihtout existing spitzer data are ldn   &lt;br /&gt;
1357 (right on the edge of some existing spitzer data) and ldn 1358.  you must be doing something right, as you're hitting popular objects. ;)   [END]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mcdonald</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://vmcoolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/index.php?title=File:LDN880_by_John.jpg&amp;diff=3007</id>
		<title>File:LDN880 by John.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://vmcoolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/index.php?title=File:LDN880_by_John.jpg&amp;diff=3007"/>
		<updated>2008-01-15T23:50:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mcdonald: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mcdonald</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://vmcoolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/index.php?title=Lynds_Target_Selection&amp;diff=3006</id>
		<title>Lynds Target Selection</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://vmcoolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/index.php?title=Lynds_Target_Selection&amp;diff=3006"/>
		<updated>2008-01-15T23:47:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mcdonald: /* LDN 880 */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I haven't done this legwork yet because I thought you might want to be involved - finding a good target for observation is a substantial part of doing science! :)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ideally, we'd pick a target for our observation using a combination of &lt;br /&gt;
*'''searching [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abstract_service.html ADS] and/or [http://simbad.u-strasbg.fr/simbad/ SIMBAD] for existing literature''' .... we want something that doesn't have a LOT of other references, but some references are fine - if someone else has already assembled data on an object, we might be able to use those data and/or results - we just don't want something that has already been &amp;quot;done to death.&amp;quot;  ([[How_can_I_find_out_what_scientists_already_know_about_a_particular_astronomy_topic_or_object%3F|page from the wiki on literature searching]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''checking POSS and other existing multi-wavelength data to see what the object looks like in those bands''' .... does it look thick and dark in the optical?  bright in the infrared?  Both of those things suggest that it will be interesting with Spitzer.  Something that looks diaphanous in the optical will likely turn out to be completely transparent with Spitzer. ([[How_can_I_get_data_from_other_wavelengths_to_compare_with_infrared_data_from_Spitzer%3F|page from the wiki on introduction to data at other wavelengths]]; you can also do this with Leopard -- see next item.)&lt;br /&gt;
*and, '''checking to see if it is or is not in the Spitzer archive''' .... you need to use Leopard to do this. ([[How_do_I_download_data_from_the_Spitzer_Telescope%3F|page from the wiki on searching the archive using Leopard]]-- NB: &amp;quot;searching the archive to see what is there&amp;quot; is the same thing as &amp;quot;downloading data&amp;quot; except that when you search to see what is there, you don't actually download the data, you just see that there is something there.)  Also, note that just because there is data already in the Archive on a given cloud doesn't mean it's a BAD thing, just that it's not a good thing for a new proposal.  You should make a note of the &amp;quot;nice&amp;quot; ones you find, because you can go grab the data as soon as the data are public.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My original thoughts on good targets were the following three:&lt;br /&gt;
*LDN 470&lt;br /&gt;
*LDN 1225&lt;br /&gt;
*LDN 880  (but maybe too diaphanous)&lt;br /&gt;
And, at the AAS, you guys also came up with&lt;br /&gt;
*LDN 1340&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=General information re: lists of targets=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The master list of objects that I worked from is [[lyndslist.txt|here]], courtesy of Babar Ali.  Note that these are all opacity class 5 objects.  Opacity class 5 or higher is what we probably want for Spitzer observations.  None of these have many references in ADS.  '''This is not meant to be a comprehensive list''' by any means, just a place to start.  If you want to instead start with the complete Lynds Dark Nebulae catalog, it's [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996yCat.7007....0L here] (the data are linked as &amp;quot;online data&amp;quot; or something similar).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please post your thoughts and reactions to each of these targets, and any new ones you think are viable candidates for observation.  For example, you might post a gif or jpeg of the POSS image you found, or a summary list of references (e.g., &amp;quot;3 papers besides Lynds, one radio, others submm&amp;quot; or whatever).  Note the syntax I'm using to post comments on LDN 1340 below -- this is a method suggested by the Oil City folks, and I think it works really well to follow the conversation.  See the help page linked from the left (above the search box) for hints on how do this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Guastella|Guastella]] 20:48, 8 January 2008 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
Here is the article I mentioned in our meeting earlier today. ''(this is the one that looked in radio at optically-selected cores and reported which ones were &amp;quot;empty.&amp;quot;'')&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
THE ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL SUPPLEMENT SERIES, 123:233È250, 1999 July&lt;br /&gt;
(1999. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in U.S.A.&lt;br /&gt;
A CATALOG OF OPTICALLY SELECTED CORES&lt;br /&gt;
CHANG WON LEE AND PHILIP C. MYERS&lt;br /&gt;
[...]&lt;br /&gt;
This didn't format well.  Please let me know if there is a better way to send papers&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks&lt;br /&gt;
Pete [END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 09:25, 9 January 2008 (PST) he's right, this didn't format well, so I replaced it with a link directly to ADS, from which you can get the complete article - there's no access restrictions on it, and if you go there, you can get the originally formatted PDF or the html.  [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJS..123..233L ADS link to the Lee and Myers paper] [END] )&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 13:44, 14 January 2008 (PST) David added some general target selection stuff to the [https://coolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/index.php/Talk:Lynds_Target_Selection talk page] [END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Observing time=&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 13:59, 14 January 2008 (PST) David asked re: time to cover area.&lt;br /&gt;
A map I have here that goes about the depth we want covers about 0.6deg x0.6 deg with IRAC takes 1.5 hrs, and more or less the same area takes another 1.4 hrs with MIPS.  3 hrs is probably too much to ask for, especially if you want to ask for more than one cloud.  less than that size, 0.3 deg x 0.3 deg, with IRAC takes 0.4 hrs, and up to 0.7 hrs with MIPS. (i can get clever and try to make that less time, but this is the lowest-energy solution.)  For an irregularly-sized thing like LDN 951, i can get creative and make something other than a square map, but it takes longer for me to design.&lt;br /&gt;
so we need to decide if '''(a) we have something really cool we want to completely map, or (b) two smaller things (could be pieces of a large thing) we want to map to compare them.'''&lt;br /&gt;
Note that, for example, the object LDN 1340 is more like ~1 degree x ~1 degree, so we'd have to do just a small piece (or two small pieces) of it.&lt;br /&gt;
[END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=LDN 470=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:ldn470possred.gif]]  LDN 470 in POSS-red.  image is 0.25 deg on a side. --[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 14:09, 14 January 2008 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 --[[User:Mcdonald|Mcdonald]] 15:39, 15 January 2008 (PST)   Hi, here is a colored image of LDN 470:&lt;br /&gt;
   [[Image:ldn470.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=LDN 1225=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:ldn1225possred.gif]]  LDN 1225 in POSS-red.  image is 0.25 deg on a side. --[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 14:09, 14 January 2008 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 --[[User:Mcdonald|Mcdonald]] 15:44, 15 January 2008 (PST)   Here is a 15 arcmin x 15 arcmin colored image of ldn1225:&lt;br /&gt;
   [[Image:ldn1225.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=LDN 880=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:ldn880possred.gif |left]]  LDN 880 in POSS-red.  image is 0.25 deg on a side.   Still a little worried that this is too optically thin to make a good Spitzer image.  but maybe we could focus very specifically on the dark thing to the southwest. &lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 14:09, 14 January 2008 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:deepi.png]] [[image:deepr.png]] - LDN 880, about the same scale, in relatively deep I and R from the USNO 1.0m.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 14:43, 14 January 2008 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 --[[User:Mcdonald|Mcdonald]] 15:47, 15 January 2008 (PST)   Here is John's colored image made in Austin again 15 x 15 arcmin:&lt;br /&gt;
   [[Image:LDN880 by John.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=LDN 1340=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:ldn1340possred.gif|left]]  LDN 1340 in POSS-red.  image is 0.25 deg on a side. --[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 14:09, 14 January 2008 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 20:14, 8 January 2008 (PST)  Here's a summary of the latest developments on this object:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of you (Peter?) suggested this object - and it was a fabulous suggestion.  Beautiful in the optical, with IRAS sources, a handful of existing literature, and no Spitzer. Perfect!  The icing on the cake was that it's visible in the Spring.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of you (Peter again?) noticed that there was another AAS poster from 2005 on this object.  I mentioned that I knew 2 of the authors (JoAnn O'Linger and Grace Wolf-Chase).  Not 2 hours after leaving you, I ran into them.  One thing I didn't mention in the context of searching the archive is that there is an open call for proposals out now, eg., there are ~700 proposals for objects that are currently being reviewed, and 20% of them will get their targets approved by March.  To some extent, since you're putting in a proposal more or less now, you kind of trump them.  On the other hand, it's never good to make enemies....  So, it turns out that JoAnn and collaborators have submitted a proposal to map this region over 1 square degree.  There's no guarantee that their data will actually be taken this cycle (before we run out of cryogen in Spring 2009), but at the same time, we probably won't be able to ask for a full square degree (it would take too much time).  We could pick a subregion to focus on, or we could find another target entirely.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'll continue to talk to JoAnn (we had just a brief conversation today), and if I can get her posters (one from before, one from this meeting!), I'll post them here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Guastella|Guastella]] 20:48, 8 January 2008 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
In case we are still looking at this here is the 2005 Abstract&lt;br /&gt;
Submillimetre Observations of an Intermediate-Mass Star Forming Cloud Core J. O’Linger, G. H. Moriarty-&lt;br /&gt;
Schieven, and G. A. Wolf-Chase&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005AAS...20718413O ADS link to AAS abstract]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005prpl.conf.8600O ADS link to PPV abstract]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 09:37, 9 January 2008 (PST) I talked to JoAnn again today, and she thinks that maybe doing just a piece of the cloud would be a good idea.  She showed me some of her supporting data, and indeed this is a really cool area. We could do just a part of it now, and eventually, she'll map the rest of the cloud as well.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's her poster from today: [[Media:joann2008poster.pdf]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=LDN 951=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From:   cdewolf@chsd.us&lt;br /&gt;
How does LDN 951 look? Assuming I did my query right, it also hasn't been looked at by Spitzer. I found it on a list of LDNs that have visual opacities of 6 in a paper by Visser et. al, 2002. There's another, but it doesn't look as interesting.&lt;br /&gt;
Cris L. DeWolf&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:LDN951.red.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 14:00, 9 January 2008 (PST) ooh, this is a nice one!  you're right, it doesn't have any Spitzer observations yet.  This might very well be a good candidate!  [END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Dewolf|Dewolf]] 06:00, 12 January 2008 (PST)There was a study of IRAS associations with dark clouds (Parker, N.D., 1988) that appears to indicate a good chance of there being a YSO in LDN 951. Here's a link to the article.&lt;br /&gt;
[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1988MNRAS.235..139P&amp;amp;db_key=AST&amp;amp;link_type=ABSTRACT&amp;amp;high=4788c3397d22375]&lt;br /&gt;
[END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Other targets=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 11:42, 9 January 2008 (PST) I found two posters today on Lynds clouds - L1221 and L988e.  L1221 has Spitzer data which is pretty cool; L988 doesn't have any Spitzer data.  Take a look at the other bands and references and see if it would be interesting....&lt;br /&gt;
[END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 14:09, 14 January 2008 (PST) nevermind; the L988 image is pretty much just a star field. [END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:l1014.jpg|left]]&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 14:27, 14 January 2008 (PST) just for comparison, here is a spitzer composite image of L1014. we'd be very lucky to find something like this, but this is the hope. [END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 13:44, 14 January 2008 (PST) David added some general target selection stuff to the [https://coolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/index.php/Talk:Lynds_Target_Selection talk page] [END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 10:48, 15 January 2008 (PST) Out of David's top 16 suggestions, the only ones wihtout existing spitzer data are ldn   &lt;br /&gt;
1357 (right on the edge of some existing spitzer data) and ldn 1358.  you must be doing something right, as you're hitting popular objects. ;)   [END]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mcdonald</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://vmcoolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/index.php?title=File:Ldn1225.jpg&amp;diff=3005</id>
		<title>File:Ldn1225.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://vmcoolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/index.php?title=File:Ldn1225.jpg&amp;diff=3005"/>
		<updated>2008-01-15T23:45:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mcdonald: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mcdonald</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://vmcoolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/index.php?title=Lynds_Target_Selection&amp;diff=3004</id>
		<title>Lynds Target Selection</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://vmcoolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/index.php?title=Lynds_Target_Selection&amp;diff=3004"/>
		<updated>2008-01-15T23:44:59Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mcdonald: /* LDN 1225 */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I haven't done this legwork yet because I thought you might want to be involved - finding a good target for observation is a substantial part of doing science! :)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ideally, we'd pick a target for our observation using a combination of &lt;br /&gt;
*'''searching [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abstract_service.html ADS] and/or [http://simbad.u-strasbg.fr/simbad/ SIMBAD] for existing literature''' .... we want something that doesn't have a LOT of other references, but some references are fine - if someone else has already assembled data on an object, we might be able to use those data and/or results - we just don't want something that has already been &amp;quot;done to death.&amp;quot;  ([[How_can_I_find_out_what_scientists_already_know_about_a_particular_astronomy_topic_or_object%3F|page from the wiki on literature searching]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''checking POSS and other existing multi-wavelength data to see what the object looks like in those bands''' .... does it look thick and dark in the optical?  bright in the infrared?  Both of those things suggest that it will be interesting with Spitzer.  Something that looks diaphanous in the optical will likely turn out to be completely transparent with Spitzer. ([[How_can_I_get_data_from_other_wavelengths_to_compare_with_infrared_data_from_Spitzer%3F|page from the wiki on introduction to data at other wavelengths]]; you can also do this with Leopard -- see next item.)&lt;br /&gt;
*and, '''checking to see if it is or is not in the Spitzer archive''' .... you need to use Leopard to do this. ([[How_do_I_download_data_from_the_Spitzer_Telescope%3F|page from the wiki on searching the archive using Leopard]]-- NB: &amp;quot;searching the archive to see what is there&amp;quot; is the same thing as &amp;quot;downloading data&amp;quot; except that when you search to see what is there, you don't actually download the data, you just see that there is something there.)  Also, note that just because there is data already in the Archive on a given cloud doesn't mean it's a BAD thing, just that it's not a good thing for a new proposal.  You should make a note of the &amp;quot;nice&amp;quot; ones you find, because you can go grab the data as soon as the data are public.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My original thoughts on good targets were the following three:&lt;br /&gt;
*LDN 470&lt;br /&gt;
*LDN 1225&lt;br /&gt;
*LDN 880  (but maybe too diaphanous)&lt;br /&gt;
And, at the AAS, you guys also came up with&lt;br /&gt;
*LDN 1340&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=General information re: lists of targets=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The master list of objects that I worked from is [[lyndslist.txt|here]], courtesy of Babar Ali.  Note that these are all opacity class 5 objects.  Opacity class 5 or higher is what we probably want for Spitzer observations.  None of these have many references in ADS.  '''This is not meant to be a comprehensive list''' by any means, just a place to start.  If you want to instead start with the complete Lynds Dark Nebulae catalog, it's [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996yCat.7007....0L here] (the data are linked as &amp;quot;online data&amp;quot; or something similar).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please post your thoughts and reactions to each of these targets, and any new ones you think are viable candidates for observation.  For example, you might post a gif or jpeg of the POSS image you found, or a summary list of references (e.g., &amp;quot;3 papers besides Lynds, one radio, others submm&amp;quot; or whatever).  Note the syntax I'm using to post comments on LDN 1340 below -- this is a method suggested by the Oil City folks, and I think it works really well to follow the conversation.  See the help page linked from the left (above the search box) for hints on how do this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Guastella|Guastella]] 20:48, 8 January 2008 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
Here is the article I mentioned in our meeting earlier today. ''(this is the one that looked in radio at optically-selected cores and reported which ones were &amp;quot;empty.&amp;quot;'')&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
THE ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL SUPPLEMENT SERIES, 123:233È250, 1999 July&lt;br /&gt;
(1999. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in U.S.A.&lt;br /&gt;
A CATALOG OF OPTICALLY SELECTED CORES&lt;br /&gt;
CHANG WON LEE AND PHILIP C. MYERS&lt;br /&gt;
[...]&lt;br /&gt;
This didn't format well.  Please let me know if there is a better way to send papers&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks&lt;br /&gt;
Pete [END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 09:25, 9 January 2008 (PST) he's right, this didn't format well, so I replaced it with a link directly to ADS, from which you can get the complete article - there's no access restrictions on it, and if you go there, you can get the originally formatted PDF or the html.  [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJS..123..233L ADS link to the Lee and Myers paper] [END] )&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 13:44, 14 January 2008 (PST) David added some general target selection stuff to the [https://coolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/index.php/Talk:Lynds_Target_Selection talk page] [END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Observing time=&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 13:59, 14 January 2008 (PST) David asked re: time to cover area.&lt;br /&gt;
A map I have here that goes about the depth we want covers about 0.6deg x0.6 deg with IRAC takes 1.5 hrs, and more or less the same area takes another 1.4 hrs with MIPS.  3 hrs is probably too much to ask for, especially if you want to ask for more than one cloud.  less than that size, 0.3 deg x 0.3 deg, with IRAC takes 0.4 hrs, and up to 0.7 hrs with MIPS. (i can get clever and try to make that less time, but this is the lowest-energy solution.)  For an irregularly-sized thing like LDN 951, i can get creative and make something other than a square map, but it takes longer for me to design.&lt;br /&gt;
so we need to decide if '''(a) we have something really cool we want to completely map, or (b) two smaller things (could be pieces of a large thing) we want to map to compare them.'''&lt;br /&gt;
Note that, for example, the object LDN 1340 is more like ~1 degree x ~1 degree, so we'd have to do just a small piece (or two small pieces) of it.&lt;br /&gt;
[END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=LDN 470=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:ldn470possred.gif]]  LDN 470 in POSS-red.  image is 0.25 deg on a side. --[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 14:09, 14 January 2008 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 --[[User:Mcdonald|Mcdonald]] 15:39, 15 January 2008 (PST)   Hi, here is a colored image of LDN 470:&lt;br /&gt;
   [[Image:ldn470.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=LDN 1225=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:ldn1225possred.gif]]  LDN 1225 in POSS-red.  image is 0.25 deg on a side. --[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 14:09, 14 January 2008 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 --[[User:Mcdonald|Mcdonald]] 15:44, 15 January 2008 (PST)   Here is a 15 arcmin x 15 arcmin colored image of ldn1225:&lt;br /&gt;
   [[Image:ldn1225.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=LDN 880=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:ldn880possred.gif |left]]  LDN 880 in POSS-red.  image is 0.25 deg on a side.   Still a little worried that this is too optically thin to make a good Spitzer image.  but maybe we could focus very specifically on the dark thing to the southwest. &lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 14:09, 14 January 2008 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:deepi.png]] [[image:deepr.png]] - LDN 880, about the same scale, in relatively deep I and R from the USNO 1.0m.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 14:43, 14 January 2008 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=LDN 1340=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:ldn1340possred.gif|left]]  LDN 1340 in POSS-red.  image is 0.25 deg on a side. --[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 14:09, 14 January 2008 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 20:14, 8 January 2008 (PST)  Here's a summary of the latest developments on this object:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of you (Peter?) suggested this object - and it was a fabulous suggestion.  Beautiful in the optical, with IRAS sources, a handful of existing literature, and no Spitzer. Perfect!  The icing on the cake was that it's visible in the Spring.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of you (Peter again?) noticed that there was another AAS poster from 2005 on this object.  I mentioned that I knew 2 of the authors (JoAnn O'Linger and Grace Wolf-Chase).  Not 2 hours after leaving you, I ran into them.  One thing I didn't mention in the context of searching the archive is that there is an open call for proposals out now, eg., there are ~700 proposals for objects that are currently being reviewed, and 20% of them will get their targets approved by March.  To some extent, since you're putting in a proposal more or less now, you kind of trump them.  On the other hand, it's never good to make enemies....  So, it turns out that JoAnn and collaborators have submitted a proposal to map this region over 1 square degree.  There's no guarantee that their data will actually be taken this cycle (before we run out of cryogen in Spring 2009), but at the same time, we probably won't be able to ask for a full square degree (it would take too much time).  We could pick a subregion to focus on, or we could find another target entirely.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'll continue to talk to JoAnn (we had just a brief conversation today), and if I can get her posters (one from before, one from this meeting!), I'll post them here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Guastella|Guastella]] 20:48, 8 January 2008 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
In case we are still looking at this here is the 2005 Abstract&lt;br /&gt;
Submillimetre Observations of an Intermediate-Mass Star Forming Cloud Core J. O’Linger, G. H. Moriarty-&lt;br /&gt;
Schieven, and G. A. Wolf-Chase&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005AAS...20718413O ADS link to AAS abstract]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005prpl.conf.8600O ADS link to PPV abstract]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 09:37, 9 January 2008 (PST) I talked to JoAnn again today, and she thinks that maybe doing just a piece of the cloud would be a good idea.  She showed me some of her supporting data, and indeed this is a really cool area. We could do just a part of it now, and eventually, she'll map the rest of the cloud as well.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's her poster from today: [[Media:joann2008poster.pdf]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=LDN 951=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From:   cdewolf@chsd.us&lt;br /&gt;
How does LDN 951 look? Assuming I did my query right, it also hasn't been looked at by Spitzer. I found it on a list of LDNs that have visual opacities of 6 in a paper by Visser et. al, 2002. There's another, but it doesn't look as interesting.&lt;br /&gt;
Cris L. DeWolf&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:LDN951.red.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 14:00, 9 January 2008 (PST) ooh, this is a nice one!  you're right, it doesn't have any Spitzer observations yet.  This might very well be a good candidate!  [END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Dewolf|Dewolf]] 06:00, 12 January 2008 (PST)There was a study of IRAS associations with dark clouds (Parker, N.D., 1988) that appears to indicate a good chance of there being a YSO in LDN 951. Here's a link to the article.&lt;br /&gt;
[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1988MNRAS.235..139P&amp;amp;db_key=AST&amp;amp;link_type=ABSTRACT&amp;amp;high=4788c3397d22375]&lt;br /&gt;
[END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Other targets=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 11:42, 9 January 2008 (PST) I found two posters today on Lynds clouds - L1221 and L988e.  L1221 has Spitzer data which is pretty cool; L988 doesn't have any Spitzer data.  Take a look at the other bands and references and see if it would be interesting....&lt;br /&gt;
[END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 14:09, 14 January 2008 (PST) nevermind; the L988 image is pretty much just a star field. [END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:l1014.jpg|left]]&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 14:27, 14 January 2008 (PST) just for comparison, here is a spitzer composite image of L1014. we'd be very lucky to find something like this, but this is the hope. [END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 13:44, 14 January 2008 (PST) David added some general target selection stuff to the [https://coolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/index.php/Talk:Lynds_Target_Selection talk page] [END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 10:48, 15 January 2008 (PST) Out of David's top 16 suggestions, the only ones wihtout existing spitzer data are ldn   &lt;br /&gt;
1357 (right on the edge of some existing spitzer data) and ldn 1358.  you must be doing something right, as you're hitting popular objects. ;)   [END]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mcdonald</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://vmcoolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/index.php?title=File:Ldn470.jpg&amp;diff=3003</id>
		<title>File:Ldn470.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://vmcoolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/index.php?title=File:Ldn470.jpg&amp;diff=3003"/>
		<updated>2008-01-15T23:40:35Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mcdonald: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mcdonald</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://vmcoolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/index.php?title=Lynds_Target_Selection&amp;diff=3002</id>
		<title>Lynds Target Selection</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://vmcoolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/index.php?title=Lynds_Target_Selection&amp;diff=3002"/>
		<updated>2008-01-15T23:39:32Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mcdonald: /* LDN 470 */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I haven't done this legwork yet because I thought you might want to be involved - finding a good target for observation is a substantial part of doing science! :)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ideally, we'd pick a target for our observation using a combination of &lt;br /&gt;
*'''searching [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abstract_service.html ADS] and/or [http://simbad.u-strasbg.fr/simbad/ SIMBAD] for existing literature''' .... we want something that doesn't have a LOT of other references, but some references are fine - if someone else has already assembled data on an object, we might be able to use those data and/or results - we just don't want something that has already been &amp;quot;done to death.&amp;quot;  ([[How_can_I_find_out_what_scientists_already_know_about_a_particular_astronomy_topic_or_object%3F|page from the wiki on literature searching]])&lt;br /&gt;
*'''checking POSS and other existing multi-wavelength data to see what the object looks like in those bands''' .... does it look thick and dark in the optical?  bright in the infrared?  Both of those things suggest that it will be interesting with Spitzer.  Something that looks diaphanous in the optical will likely turn out to be completely transparent with Spitzer. ([[How_can_I_get_data_from_other_wavelengths_to_compare_with_infrared_data_from_Spitzer%3F|page from the wiki on introduction to data at other wavelengths]]; you can also do this with Leopard -- see next item.)&lt;br /&gt;
*and, '''checking to see if it is or is not in the Spitzer archive''' .... you need to use Leopard to do this. ([[How_do_I_download_data_from_the_Spitzer_Telescope%3F|page from the wiki on searching the archive using Leopard]]-- NB: &amp;quot;searching the archive to see what is there&amp;quot; is the same thing as &amp;quot;downloading data&amp;quot; except that when you search to see what is there, you don't actually download the data, you just see that there is something there.)  Also, note that just because there is data already in the Archive on a given cloud doesn't mean it's a BAD thing, just that it's not a good thing for a new proposal.  You should make a note of the &amp;quot;nice&amp;quot; ones you find, because you can go grab the data as soon as the data are public.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My original thoughts on good targets were the following three:&lt;br /&gt;
*LDN 470&lt;br /&gt;
*LDN 1225&lt;br /&gt;
*LDN 880  (but maybe too diaphanous)&lt;br /&gt;
And, at the AAS, you guys also came up with&lt;br /&gt;
*LDN 1340&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=General information re: lists of targets=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The master list of objects that I worked from is [[lyndslist.txt|here]], courtesy of Babar Ali.  Note that these are all opacity class 5 objects.  Opacity class 5 or higher is what we probably want for Spitzer observations.  None of these have many references in ADS.  '''This is not meant to be a comprehensive list''' by any means, just a place to start.  If you want to instead start with the complete Lynds Dark Nebulae catalog, it's [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996yCat.7007....0L here] (the data are linked as &amp;quot;online data&amp;quot; or something similar).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please post your thoughts and reactions to each of these targets, and any new ones you think are viable candidates for observation.  For example, you might post a gif or jpeg of the POSS image you found, or a summary list of references (e.g., &amp;quot;3 papers besides Lynds, one radio, others submm&amp;quot; or whatever).  Note the syntax I'm using to post comments on LDN 1340 below -- this is a method suggested by the Oil City folks, and I think it works really well to follow the conversation.  See the help page linked from the left (above the search box) for hints on how do this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Guastella|Guastella]] 20:48, 8 January 2008 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
Here is the article I mentioned in our meeting earlier today. ''(this is the one that looked in radio at optically-selected cores and reported which ones were &amp;quot;empty.&amp;quot;'')&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
THE ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL SUPPLEMENT SERIES, 123:233È250, 1999 July&lt;br /&gt;
(1999. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in U.S.A.&lt;br /&gt;
A CATALOG OF OPTICALLY SELECTED CORES&lt;br /&gt;
CHANG WON LEE AND PHILIP C. MYERS&lt;br /&gt;
[...]&lt;br /&gt;
This didn't format well.  Please let me know if there is a better way to send papers&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks&lt;br /&gt;
Pete [END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 09:25, 9 January 2008 (PST) he's right, this didn't format well, so I replaced it with a link directly to ADS, from which you can get the complete article - there's no access restrictions on it, and if you go there, you can get the originally formatted PDF or the html.  [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJS..123..233L ADS link to the Lee and Myers paper] [END] )&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 13:44, 14 January 2008 (PST) David added some general target selection stuff to the [https://coolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/index.php/Talk:Lynds_Target_Selection talk page] [END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Observing time=&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 13:59, 14 January 2008 (PST) David asked re: time to cover area.&lt;br /&gt;
A map I have here that goes about the depth we want covers about 0.6deg x0.6 deg with IRAC takes 1.5 hrs, and more or less the same area takes another 1.4 hrs with MIPS.  3 hrs is probably too much to ask for, especially if you want to ask for more than one cloud.  less than that size, 0.3 deg x 0.3 deg, with IRAC takes 0.4 hrs, and up to 0.7 hrs with MIPS. (i can get clever and try to make that less time, but this is the lowest-energy solution.)  For an irregularly-sized thing like LDN 951, i can get creative and make something other than a square map, but it takes longer for me to design.&lt;br /&gt;
so we need to decide if '''(a) we have something really cool we want to completely map, or (b) two smaller things (could be pieces of a large thing) we want to map to compare them.'''&lt;br /&gt;
Note that, for example, the object LDN 1340 is more like ~1 degree x ~1 degree, so we'd have to do just a small piece (or two small pieces) of it.&lt;br /&gt;
[END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=LDN 470=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:ldn470possred.gif]]  LDN 470 in POSS-red.  image is 0.25 deg on a side. --[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 14:09, 14 January 2008 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 --[[User:Mcdonald|Mcdonald]] 15:39, 15 January 2008 (PST)   Hi, here is a colored image of LDN 470:&lt;br /&gt;
   [[Image:ldn470.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=LDN 1225=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:ldn1225possred.gif]]  LDN 1225 in POSS-red.  image is 0.25 deg on a side. --[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 14:09, 14 January 2008 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=LDN 880=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:ldn880possred.gif |left]]  LDN 880 in POSS-red.  image is 0.25 deg on a side.   Still a little worried that this is too optically thin to make a good Spitzer image.  but maybe we could focus very specifically on the dark thing to the southwest. &lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 14:09, 14 January 2008 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:deepi.png]] [[image:deepr.png]] - LDN 880, about the same scale, in relatively deep I and R from the USNO 1.0m.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 14:43, 14 January 2008 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=LDN 1340=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:ldn1340possred.gif|left]]  LDN 1340 in POSS-red.  image is 0.25 deg on a side. --[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 14:09, 14 January 2008 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 20:14, 8 January 2008 (PST)  Here's a summary of the latest developments on this object:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of you (Peter?) suggested this object - and it was a fabulous suggestion.  Beautiful in the optical, with IRAS sources, a handful of existing literature, and no Spitzer. Perfect!  The icing on the cake was that it's visible in the Spring.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of you (Peter again?) noticed that there was another AAS poster from 2005 on this object.  I mentioned that I knew 2 of the authors (JoAnn O'Linger and Grace Wolf-Chase).  Not 2 hours after leaving you, I ran into them.  One thing I didn't mention in the context of searching the archive is that there is an open call for proposals out now, eg., there are ~700 proposals for objects that are currently being reviewed, and 20% of them will get their targets approved by March.  To some extent, since you're putting in a proposal more or less now, you kind of trump them.  On the other hand, it's never good to make enemies....  So, it turns out that JoAnn and collaborators have submitted a proposal to map this region over 1 square degree.  There's no guarantee that their data will actually be taken this cycle (before we run out of cryogen in Spring 2009), but at the same time, we probably won't be able to ask for a full square degree (it would take too much time).  We could pick a subregion to focus on, or we could find another target entirely.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'll continue to talk to JoAnn (we had just a brief conversation today), and if I can get her posters (one from before, one from this meeting!), I'll post them here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Guastella|Guastella]] 20:48, 8 January 2008 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
In case we are still looking at this here is the 2005 Abstract&lt;br /&gt;
Submillimetre Observations of an Intermediate-Mass Star Forming Cloud Core J. O’Linger, G. H. Moriarty-&lt;br /&gt;
Schieven, and G. A. Wolf-Chase&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005AAS...20718413O ADS link to AAS abstract]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005prpl.conf.8600O ADS link to PPV abstract]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 09:37, 9 January 2008 (PST) I talked to JoAnn again today, and she thinks that maybe doing just a piece of the cloud would be a good idea.  She showed me some of her supporting data, and indeed this is a really cool area. We could do just a part of it now, and eventually, she'll map the rest of the cloud as well.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's her poster from today: [[Media:joann2008poster.pdf]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=LDN 951=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From:   cdewolf@chsd.us&lt;br /&gt;
How does LDN 951 look? Assuming I did my query right, it also hasn't been looked at by Spitzer. I found it on a list of LDNs that have visual opacities of 6 in a paper by Visser et. al, 2002. There's another, but it doesn't look as interesting.&lt;br /&gt;
Cris L. DeWolf&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:LDN951.red.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 14:00, 9 January 2008 (PST) ooh, this is a nice one!  you're right, it doesn't have any Spitzer observations yet.  This might very well be a good candidate!  [END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Dewolf|Dewolf]] 06:00, 12 January 2008 (PST)There was a study of IRAS associations with dark clouds (Parker, N.D., 1988) that appears to indicate a good chance of there being a YSO in LDN 951. Here's a link to the article.&lt;br /&gt;
[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1988MNRAS.235..139P&amp;amp;db_key=AST&amp;amp;link_type=ABSTRACT&amp;amp;high=4788c3397d22375]&lt;br /&gt;
[END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Other targets=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 11:42, 9 January 2008 (PST) I found two posters today on Lynds clouds - L1221 and L988e.  L1221 has Spitzer data which is pretty cool; L988 doesn't have any Spitzer data.  Take a look at the other bands and references and see if it would be interesting....&lt;br /&gt;
[END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 14:09, 14 January 2008 (PST) nevermind; the L988 image is pretty much just a star field. [END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:l1014.jpg|left]]&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 14:27, 14 January 2008 (PST) just for comparison, here is a spitzer composite image of L1014. we'd be very lucky to find something like this, but this is the hope. [END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 13:44, 14 January 2008 (PST) David added some general target selection stuff to the [https://coolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/index.php/Talk:Lynds_Target_Selection talk page] [END]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 10:48, 15 January 2008 (PST) Out of David's top 16 suggestions, the only ones wihtout existing spitzer data are ldn   &lt;br /&gt;
1357 (right on the edge of some existing spitzer data) and ldn 1358.  you must be doing something right, as you're hitting popular objects. ;)   [END]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mcdonald</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://vmcoolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/index.php?title=File:Ldnlisting.xls&amp;diff=3000</id>
		<title>File:Ldnlisting.xls</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://vmcoolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/index.php?title=File:Ldnlisting.xls&amp;diff=3000"/>
		<updated>2008-01-15T00:07:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mcdonald: A listing of Lynds dark nebula with
sheet 2 a listing of 6 and 5's&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;A listing of Lynds dark nebula with&lt;br /&gt;
sheet 2 a listing of 6 and 5's&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mcdonald</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://vmcoolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/index.php?title=Talk:Lynds_Target_Selection&amp;diff=2999</id>
		<title>Talk:Lynds Target Selection</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://vmcoolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/index.php?title=Talk:Lynds_Target_Selection&amp;diff=2999"/>
		<updated>2008-01-15T00:04:41Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mcdonald: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Dear All&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry about the mess at the bottom.&lt;br /&gt;
I will email the Excel file&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
later&lt;br /&gt;
david&lt;br /&gt;
Dear All&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ok so I deleted bad formated data below and will try posting the excel file.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
later&lt;br /&gt;
david&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dear Lynds&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I hope you all made it home safe and sound.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wednesday night as I was driving home the sky was GREAT.  Very dark and the&lt;br /&gt;
Milky Way sure stood out.  I looked but did not see any nebula.  :)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using http://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov I did a search and got a list of Lynds nebula&lt;br /&gt;
with ra, dec, cloud area in degrees squared and rating of opacity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I placed list on excel and sorted by opacity and then area.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hopefully the list will be below for all 6 and 5 lens nebula.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does any one know about what area we can look at in 1 hour?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
later&lt;br /&gt;
david&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
name, ra, dec, cloud area (degree squared), area in arcmin squared I think,&lt;br /&gt;
opacity&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 53	17 23 08.90	-23 54 47.2	0.001	3.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 --[[User:Mcdonald|Mcdonald]] 16:04, 14 January 2008 (PST)   Hi is all goes well this is the excel file:&lt;br /&gt;
   [[Media:ldnlisting.xls]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mcdonald</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://vmcoolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/index.php?title=Talk:Lynds_Target_Selection&amp;diff=2998</id>
		<title>Talk:Lynds Target Selection</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://vmcoolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/index.php?title=Talk:Lynds_Target_Selection&amp;diff=2998"/>
		<updated>2008-01-14T23:59:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mcdonald: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Dear All&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry about the mess at the bottom.&lt;br /&gt;
I will email the Excel file&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
later&lt;br /&gt;
david&lt;br /&gt;
Dear All&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ok so I deleted bad formated data below and will try posting the excel file.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
later&lt;br /&gt;
david&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dear Lynds&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I hope you all made it home safe and sound.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wednesday night as I was driving home the sky was GREAT.  Very dark and the&lt;br /&gt;
Milky Way sure stood out.  I looked but did not see any nebula.  :)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using http://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov I did a search and got a list of Lynds nebula&lt;br /&gt;
with ra, dec, cloud area in degrees squared and rating of opacity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I placed list on excel and sorted by opacity and then area.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hopefully the list will be below for all 6 and 5 lens nebula.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does any one know about what area we can look at in 1 hour?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
later&lt;br /&gt;
david&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
name, ra, dec, cloud area (degree squared), area in arcmin squared I think,&lt;br /&gt;
opacity&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 53	17 23 08.90	-23 54 47.2	0.001	3.6	6&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mcdonald</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://vmcoolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/index.php?title=Talk:Lynds_Target_Selection&amp;diff=2979</id>
		<title>Talk:Lynds Target Selection</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://vmcoolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/index.php?title=Talk:Lynds_Target_Selection&amp;diff=2979"/>
		<updated>2008-01-14T20:41:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mcdonald: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Dear All&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry about the mess at the bottom.&lt;br /&gt;
I will email the Excel file&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
later&lt;br /&gt;
david&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dear Lynds&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I hope you all made it home safe and sound.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wednesday night as I was driving home the sky was GREAT.  Very dark and the&lt;br /&gt;
Milky Way sure stood out.  I looked but did not see any nebula.  :)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using http://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov I did a search and got a list of Lynds nebula&lt;br /&gt;
with ra, dec, cloud area in degrees squared and rating of opacity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I placed list on excel and sorted by opacity and then area.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hopefully the list will be below for all 6 and 5 lens nebula.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does any one know about what area we can look at in 1 hour?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
later&lt;br /&gt;
david&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
name, ra, dec, cloud area (degree squared), area in arcmin squared I think,&lt;br /&gt;
opacity&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 53	17 23 08.90	-23 54 47.2	0.001	3.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 233	17 45 03.98	-20 01 11.6	0.001	3.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 222	17 41 09.65	-19 46 28.9	0.001	3.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 223	17 40 45.55	-19 42 30.6	0.001	3.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 231	17 40 21.31	-19 31 32.2	0.001	3.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 307	18 06 14.02	-18 26 39.1	0.001	3.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 308	18 06 43.99	-18 25 36.8	0.001	3.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 328	18 16 55.39	-17 59 52.4	0.001	3.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 372	18 30 34.82	-16 03 52.9	0.001	3.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 860	20 04 52.13	+36 03 36.0	0.001	3.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 953	21 21 23.38	+43 22 49.1	0.001	3.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 917	20 40 14.09	+44 08 42.0	0.001	3.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1021 21 21 35.04	+51 01 49.8	0.001	3.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1166 22 05 39.19	+59 34 38.3	0.001	3.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1233 23 16 27.19	+62 20 23.3	0.001	3.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 228	17 40 45.43	-19 37 30.4	0.002	7.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 229	17 40 09.29	-19 30 33.1	0.002	7.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 495	18 38 53.45	-06 39 16.6	0.002	7.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 490	18 15 08.18	-03 48 59.8	0.002	7.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 709	19 14 15.07	+16 25 14.5	0.002	7.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 944	21 17 40.73	+43 17 38.4	0.002	7.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1389 04 04 32.83	+56 54 11.5	0.002	7.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1111 21 39 32.45	+57 53 38.0	0.002	7.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1246 23 25 12.84	+63 36 29.9	0.002	7.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 108	18 10 09.72	-28 19 22.4	0.003	10.8	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 55	17 23 02.86	-23 52 47.6	0.003	10.8	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 57	17 22 38.64	-23 43 49.1	0.003	10.8	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 226	17 40 33.48	-19 39 31.3	0.003	10.8	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 509	18 53 42.10	-07 18 13.0	0.003	10.8	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 675	19 23 57.53	+11 05 54.2	0.003	10.8	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 928	20 41 01.44	+44 35 44.9	0.003	10.8	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1103 21 41 41.90	+56 43 43.3	0.003	10.8	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 310	18 06 55.90	-18 21 36.0	0.004	14.4	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 603	18 46 20.74	+00 53 15.7	0.004	14.4	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 918	20 40 56.30	+44 05 44.5	0.004	14.4	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1014 21 24 01.58	+49 59 56.8	0.004	14.4	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1234 23 17 09.50	+62 24 23.8	0.004	14.4	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1357 02 52 30.05	+68 52 18.1	0.004	14.4	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 416	18 25 16.22	-10 38 15.7	0.005	18	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 531	19 06 05.47	-06 50 20.8	0.005	18	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 502	18 07 29.90	-01 51 32.8	0.005	18	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 663	19 36 55.68	+07 33 46.4	0.005	18	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 771	19 20 42.43	+23 31 41.5	0.005	18	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 881	20 17 47.78	+39 49 23.9	0.005	18	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 951	21 21 05.42	+43 18 48.2	0.005	18	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 922	20 38 43.03	+44 35 37.0	0.005	18	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1049 20 42 14.09	+57 30 49.7	0.005	18	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 52	17 32 11.09	-25 21 07.9	0.006	21.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 436	18 14 42.41	-07 24 01.8	0.006	21.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 460	17 58 38.11	-03 45 11.9	0.006	21.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 676	19 21 33.00	+11 30 44.3	0.006	21.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 677	19 22 20.95	+11 33 47.5	0.006	21.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1185 22 29 20.52	+59 05 23.3	0.006	21.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1155 20 43 31.08	+67 40 55.2	0.006	21.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1358 02 55 34.85	+69 22 09.1	0.006	21.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 25	17 32 30.29	-26 11 06.7	0.007	25.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1689 16 32 02.59	-25 05 21.5	0.007	25.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 111	17 15 09.98	-20 21 21.2	0.007	25.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 422	18 11 43.30	-08 09 14.8	0.007	25.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 543	19 06 40.70	-06 10 18.1	0.007	25.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 470	18 18 40.42	-05 43 44.4	0.007	25.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 877	20 14 17.18	+39 54 10.8	0.007	25.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 915	20 45 22.78	+43 05 59.3	0.007	25.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1355 02 52 43.18	+69 02 17.5	0.007	25.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1333 02 26 03.67	+75 28 32.2	0.007	25.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1775 16 57 00.70	-22 49 38.3	0.008	28.8	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 438	18 14 12.10	-07 09 04.0	0.008	28.8	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 432	17 58 40.46	-05 45 11.5	0.008	28.8	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 503	18 29 09.12	-04 37 58.4	0.008	28.8	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 492	18 15 38.18	-03 48 57.6	0.008	28.8	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 763	19 18 36.48	+23 25 32.9	0.008	28.8	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 66	17 24 02.42	-23 32 43.1	0.009	32.4	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 262	18 02 59.38	-20 59 53.5	0.009	32.4	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 129	16 54 58.44	-16 19 46.6	0.009	32.4	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1552 05 17 41.76	+26 03 10.4	0.009	32.4	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1253 23 56 31.49	+58 31 41.9	0.009	32.4	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1197 22 37 54.62	+58 55 37.2	0.009	32.4	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1704 16 30 48.82	-23 46 26.4	0.01	36	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1527 04 39 04.51	+26 15 52.9	0.01	36	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1172 21 02 40.27	+67 41 56.0	0.01	36	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 216	17 37 57.46	-19 39 42.8	0.011	39.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 330	17 50 26.71	-14 16 48.0	0.011	39.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 648	18 39 18.89	+12 42 46.1	0.011	39.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 11	17 08 07.15	-22 53 51.4	0.012	43.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 466	18 19 40.92	-06 08 39.8	0.012	43.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 698	19 26 07.30	+13 06 03.2	0.012	43.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1768 17 20 06.98	-26 52 00.1	0.013	46.8	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1148 20 40 31.75	+67 20 45.2	0.015	54	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1772 17 19 48.65	-26 38 01.7	0.016	57.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1686 16 25 49.27	-24 19 46.6	0.016	57.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 323	18 15 31.63	-18 10 58.4	0.016	57.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 769	19 24 07.15	+23 05 55.3	0.016	57.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1512 05 03 45.34	+32 47 10.3	0.016	57.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1523 05 06 13.80	+31 43 59.9	0.017	61.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 239	18 33 24.05	-26 00 41.0	0.018	64.8	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 104	17 15 58.58	-20 48 17.6	0.019	68.4	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1165 22 07 10.90	+59 04 41.5	0.019	68.4	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1164 22 06 40.51	+59 09 40.3	0.019	68.4	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 173	17 17 13.49	-18 23 12.1	0.02	72	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 122	16 55 10.94	-16 44 45.6	0.02	72	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1143 21 57 37.08	+58 59 20.8	0.02	72	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 31	16 49 55.68	-19 05 07.8	0.022	79.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 539	18 23 58.99	-01 04 21.0	0.022	79.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 567	19 04 08.81	-04 28 28.6	0.024	86.4	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1759 16 52 06.84	-23 04 58.8	0.027	97.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 497	18 39 11.40	-06 37 15.2	0.027	97.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1774 17 22 37.27	-27 00 49.3	0.029	104.4	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 255	16 47 44.76	-09 55 16.3	0.032	115.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 981	20 59 36.94	+50 11 44.9	0.033	118.8	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 588	18 36 04.27	-00 27 28.4	0.034	122.4	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 102	17 22 30.14	-21 52 49.8	0.035	126	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1773 17 21 06.91	-26 47 56.0	0.036	129.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 7	17 28 36.36	-26 17 23.6	0.036	129.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1696 16 28 49.42	-24 19 34.3	0.036	129.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 63	16 49 54.43	-18 05 07.8	0.037	133.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1235 22 14 54.79	+73 24 58.0	0.037	133.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 74	17 38 04.97	-25 11 42.4	0.038	136.8	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 235	17 46 28.22	-20 11 05.6	0.038	136.8	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 483	18 17 39.36	-04 48 48.6	0.038	136.8	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 462	18 06 39.17	-04 39 36.7	0.041	147.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 15	17 04 24.07	-22 10 07.0	0.043	154.8	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1551 04 31 23.86	+18 06 23.8	0.043	154.8	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 778	19 27 06.53	+23 41 07.4	0.043	154.8	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1782 16 41 56.23	-19 45 41.0	0.047	169.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1517 04 55 11.50	+30 34 46.2	0.051	183.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 158	16 47 49.58	-14 05 16.4	0.056	201.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1757 16 31 55.66	-19 36 21.6	0.061	219.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1627 05 46 33.74	+00 01 04.4	0.063	226.8	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 570	18 26 34.30	-00 28 09.5	0.066	237.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1262 23 26 58.97	+74 16 31.1	0.066	237.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 429	18 16 43.49	-08 18 52.9	0.068	244.8	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 43	16 34 27.26	-15 50 11.4	0.07	252	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 581	19 07 26.16	-03 55 14.9	0.072	259.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 260	16 47 44.38	-09 35 16.4	0.074	266.4	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 100	17 15 58.68	-20 53 17.9	0.075	270	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 219	17 39 27.62	-19 46 36.1	0.084	302.4	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 65	17 12 59.93	-21 53 30.5	0.088	316.8	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 704	19 26 48.55	+13 46 05.9	0.097	349.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1709 16 33 00.91	-23 46 17.4	0.099	356.4	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 694	19 40 40.06	+10 57 01.4	0.109	392.4	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1544 05 04 04.18	+25 14 08.5	0.109	392.4	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1535 04 35 31.20	+23 54 07.2	0.111	399.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1622 05 54 36.07	+02 00 29.2	0.122	439.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 162	16 49 07.80	-14 15 10.8	0.124	446.4	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 530	18 49 39.22	-04 46 30.4	0.124	446.4	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 513	18 10 35.54	-01 33 19.4	0.127	457.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 204	16 47 47.26	-12 05 16.4	0.167	601.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 557	18 38 35.81	-01 47 17.5	0.181	651.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 673	19 20 51.26	+11 15 41.4	0.199	716.4	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1506 04 20 02.16	+25 17 09.6	0.334	1202.4	6&lt;br /&gt;
					&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 199	18 15 05.47	-25 27 00.7	0.001	3.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 210	18 09 09.65	-24 07 26.8	0.001	3.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 213	18 09 03.48	-24 00 27.0	0.001	3.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 214	18 09 03.43	-23 58 27.1	0.001	3.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 87	17 18 35.95	-21 48 06.5	0.001	3.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 105	16 36 25.13	-13 57 03.2	0.001	3.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 106	16 36 43.15	-13 57 02.2	0.001	3.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 598	18 46 44.93	+00 43 17.4	0.001	3.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 601	18 46 44.83	+00 48 17.6	0.001	3.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 635	19 09 29.16	+04 07 54.1	0.001	3.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 656	19 21 18.43	+08 27 43.2	0.001	3.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1581 05 29 24.02	+12 12 19.4	0.001	3.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 948	21 20 41.42	+43 14 47.0	0.001	3.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 902	20 21 42.38	+43 19 37.9	0.001	3.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 946	21 18 58.75	+43 27 42.1	0.001	3.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 952	21 20 29.06	+43 27 46.4	0.001	3.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 919	20 32 40.68	+45 17 16.4	0.001	3.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 920	20 32 40.58	+45 20 16.4	0.001	3.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 997	21 26 36.14	+47 41 03.5	0.001	3.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1001 21 27 18.31	+47 41 05.6	0.001	3.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1423 04 44 58.34	+53 20 30.5	0.001	3.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1064 21 13 28.85	+55 37 27.1	0.001	3.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1080 21 21 29.23	+56 32 49.9	0.001	3.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1120 21 47 37.18	+57 08 57.8	0.001	3.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1118 21 46 36.65	+57 12 55.4	0.001	3.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1380 03 15 42.50	+60 09 05.0	0.001	3.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1378 03 14 54.89	+60 20 07.8	0.001	3.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1255 23 53 29.76	+60 31 41.5	0.001	3.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1340 02 30 44.26	+72 57 19.4	0.001	3.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1724 17 31 45.46	-32 13 10.2	0.002	7.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1735 17 32 08.66	-31 43 08.4	0.002	7.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1727 17 12 10.20	-29 13 34.3	0.002	7.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 196	18 10 04.85	-24 59 22.6	0.002	7.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 23	17 17 14.83	-23 58 12.4	0.002	7.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 101	17 21 48.02	-21 47 52.8	0.002	7.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 551	18 57 50.78	-04 25 55.2	0.002	7.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 504	18 18 37.39	-03 08 44.5	0.002	7.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 605	18 46 44.74	+00 53 17.5	0.002	7.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 774	19 22 54.65	+23 25 50.5	0.002	7.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 853	20 06 53.59	+35 13 43.3	0.002	7.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 882	20 19 18.26	+39 39 29.2	0.002	7.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 979	21 39 27.34	+43 21 37.1	0.002	7.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 921	20 33 10.80	+45 16 18.1	0.002	7.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 926	20 35 23.09	+45 19 25.7	0.002	7.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 925	20 33 40.75	+45 20 20.0	0.002	7.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 929	20 35 41.11	+45 20 26.9	0.002	7.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 930	20 36 53.35	+45 20 30.8	0.002	7.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1420 04 32 53.50	+52 16 19.6	0.002	7.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1077 21 37 40.70	+53 43 32.9	0.002	7.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1412 04 37 00.65	+54 26 03.1	0.002	7.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1115 21 46 37.15	+56 58 55.2	0.002	7.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1113 21 44 35.93	+57 11 50.3	0.002	7.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1179 22 27 19.73	+59 02 19.7	0.002	7.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1142 21 56 36.48	+59 04 18.8	0.002	7.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1379 03 15 31.15	+60 21 05.8	0.002	7.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1317 01 23 04.92	+61 50 39.5	0.002	7.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1230 23 14 08.30	+62 01 21.4	0.002	7.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1294 00 42 20.14	+62 16 26.4	0.002	7.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1193 22 14 36.86	+62 24 56.5	0.002	7.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1301 00 43 45.10	+62 27 25.2	0.002	7.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1094 20 32 46.30	+64 00 18.4	0.002	7.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1263 23 57 31.42	+64 50 42.0	0.002	7.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1171 20 53 31.99	+68 19 27.5	0.002	7.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1738 17 32 56.66	-31 43 05.2	0.003	10.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1715 17 12 11.71	-30 13 34.3	0.003	10.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 230	18 09 02.71	-23 27 27.0	0.003	10.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 417	18 25 16.18	-10 36 15.8	0.003	10.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 430	18 11 42.67	-07 37 14.9	0.003	10.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 518	18 53 11.30	-06 36 15.1	0.003	10.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 479	18 19 09.74	-05 08 42.0	0.003	10.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 469	18 13 27.70	-05 06 06.8	0.003	10.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 883	20 19 48.34	+39 39 31.0	0.003	10.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 956	21 11 35.35	+45 58 21.0	0.003	10.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 960	21 08 32.66	+47 10 12.0	0.003	10.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1019 21 20 59.02	+50 56 48.1	0.003	10.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1016 21 19 46.58	+51 00 44.6	0.003	10.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1437 04 59 20.18	+52 04 30.4	0.003	10.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1410 04 36 01.85	+54 51 07.2	0.003	10.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1403 04 28 31.78	+55 11 37.7	0.003	10.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1062 21 13 29.06	+55 32 26.9	0.003	10.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1123 21 39 31.03	+58 28 37.9	0.003	10.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1351 02 10 43.22	+60 49 07.7	0.003	10.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1339 01 54 34.08	+62 30 43.2	0.003	10.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1326 01 30 41.30	+63 05 27.6	0.003	10.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1325 01 29 52.87	+63 05 29.0	0.003	10.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1168 20 56 37.75	+67 36 37.1	0.003	10.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1219 22 11 35.54	+70 59 51.0	0.003	10.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1685 17 09 14.57	-32 08 47.0	0.004	14.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 36	17 28 40.82	-25 12 23.0	0.004	14.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 58	17 30 28.46	-24 55 15.6	0.004	14.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 24	17 17 32.93	-24 01 11.3	0.004	14.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 4	17 02 30.05	-22 12 15.1	0.004	14.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 427	18 26 45.22	-09 48 09.4	0.004	14.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 498	18 39 59.42	-06 39 11.9	0.004	14.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 500	18 16 37.61	-03 18 52.9	0.004	14.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1614 05 35 32.98	-00 38 07.8	0.004	14.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1491 04 04 38.45	+26 17 09.2	0.004	14.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1464 04 00 40.61	+36 40 24.6	0.004	14.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 879	20 20 49.01	+39 19 34.7	0.004	14.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1117 21 38 31.06	+58 18 35.3	0.004	14.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1127 21 40 55.37	+58 33 41.4	0.004	14.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1169 22 07 09.48	+59 44 41.6	0.004	14.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1385 03 21 01.08	+59 48 47.5	0.004	14.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1322 01 24 16.49	+61 15 37.8	0.004	14.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1182 22 13 07.32	+61 54 53.6	0.004	14.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1229 23 14 08.33	+61 59 21.5	0.004	14.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1291 00 42 13.85	+62 01 26.4	0.004	14.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1191 22 14 06.62	+62 24 55.4	0.004	14.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1202 22 26 41.45	+63 05 19.0	0.004	14.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1723 17 31 15.41	-32 12 12.6	0.005	18	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1718 17 15 11.83	-30 14 21.5	0.005	18	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 80	17 39 04.87	-25 06 38.2	0.005	18	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 92	17 18 59.86	-21 43 04.8	0.005	18	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 89	17 18 29.81	-21 42 06.8	0.005	18	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 514	18 52 53.69	-06 56 16.4	0.005	18	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 576	18 31 28.18	-00 22 48.4	0.005	18	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 702	19 36 26.47	+12 16 44.8	0.005	18	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 725	19 28 13.42	+18 10 12.0	0.005	18	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 753	19 48 14.09	+18 17 31.6	0.005	18	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 903	20 08 37.06	+45 03 50.4	0.005	18	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1047 21 48 05.42	+47 51 58.7	0.005	18	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1417 04 40 59.64	+53 55 46.9	0.005	18	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1406 04 38 03.98	+55 23 58.9	0.005	18	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1299 00 45 04.20	+55 44 24.0	0.005	18	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1186 22 13 37.06	+62 07 54.5	0.005	18	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1178 22 09 04.34	+62 19 45.5	0.005	18	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1239 23 12 20.18	+66 04 19.6	0.005	18	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1157 20 39 27.17	+68 00 41.8	0.005	18	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1734 17 32 26.90	-31 52 07.3	0.006	21.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1714 17 12 11.83	-30 18 34.2	0.006	21.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1794 17 26 24.82	-26 38 33.0	0.006	21.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 402	18 29 48.70	-12 42 56.2	0.006	21.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 467	18 18 58.70	-05 58 43.0	0.006	21.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 549	19 02 09.70	-05 15 37.1	0.006	21.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 545	18 56 45.17	-04 46 00.1	0.006	21.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 687	19 38 34.61	+10 24 53.3	0.006	21.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 942	21 16 22.58	+43 12 34.9	0.006	21.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 961	21 08 50.62	+47 14 12.8	0.006	21.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 964	21 09 32.54	+47 22 14.9	0.006	21.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1424 04 44 58.08	+53 15 30.6	0.006	21.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1044 20 41 14.30	+57 20 46.3	0.006	21.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1126 21 39 30.84	+58 33 37.8	0.006	21.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1381 03 16 31.01	+60 13 02.3	0.006	21.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1213 22 31 38.62	+65 25 27.5	0.006	21.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1173 21 04 41.28	+67 42 02.2	0.006	21.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 93	18 02 45.00	-27 49 54.8	0.007	25.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1767 17 18 36.77	-26 45 06.8	0.007	25.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 109	17 39 03.46	-24 06 38.2	0.007	25.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1692 16 26 30.82	-23 56 43.8	0.007	25.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 401	18 38 07.94	-13 47 20.0	0.007	25.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1644 06 07 39.29	-05 30 28.1	0.007	25.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 544	19 01 33.89	-05 25 39.7	0.007	25.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 505	18 19 37.49	-03 13 40.1	0.007	25.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 613	18 56 46.15	-00 20 59.6	0.007	25.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 680	19 44 42.65	+08 38 17.5	0.007	25.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1416 04 40 00.02	+54 05 51.0	0.007	25.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1192 22 33 53.35	+58 35 30.8	0.007	25.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1100 20 34 47.04	+64 00 25.2	0.007	25.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1703 17 18 44.88	-32 06 06.5	0.008	28.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 166	18 02 05.11	-25 09 57.6	0.008	28.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 61	17 31 22.46	-24 55 11.6	0.008	28.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 211	18 09 33.67	-24 09 24.8	0.008	28.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 38	17 11 18.67	-22 28 37.9	0.008	28.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 578	18 31 10.32	-00 29 49.6	0.008	28.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1604 06 28 47.40	+11 38 00.6	0.008	28.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1503 04 40 21.74	+29 55 47.6	0.008	28.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 947	21 19 59.18	+43 18 45.0	0.008	28.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1099 21 36 32.52	+57 23 30.1	0.008	28.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1102 21 32 29.42	+58 03 19.8	0.008	28.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1121 21 40 31.92	+58 16 40.4	0.008	28.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1386 03 22 13.01	+59 40 43.7	0.008	28.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1076 20 49 20.81	+59 51 13.3	0.008	28.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1300 00 43 56.21	+61 26 25.1	0.008	28.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1227 23 10 05.81	+62 19 17.8	0.008	28.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 81	17 25 01.70	-23 00 38.9	0.009	32.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 360	17 51 42.22	-12 15 42.5	0.009	32.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1450 03 29 35.69	+31 20 16.8	0.009	32.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 987	21 00 48.24	+50 40 48.7	0.009	32.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1421 04 32 52.78	+52 01 19.9	0.009	32.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1430 04 48 55.22	+52 08 13.9	0.009	32.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 95	17 19 59.83	-21 41 00.6	0.01	36	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 411	18 27 47.21	-11 28 04.8	0.01	36	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 413	18 26 34.92	-11 13 10.2	0.01	36	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 414	18 24 16.46	-10 50 20.0	0.01	36	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 420	18 25 45.82	-10 18 13.7	0.01	36	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 392	17 53 43.70	-08 30 33.5	0.01	36	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 723	19 18 11.78	+19 13 30.7	0.01	36	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 782	19 28 06.24	+23 56 11.8	0.01	36	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 971	21 00 50.98	+49 18 49.0	0.01	36	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1431 04 47 54.72	+52 00 18.4	0.01	36	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1051 20 42 44.23	+57 30 51.5	0.01	36	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1119 21 13 11.26	+61 42 26.6	0.01	36	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1125 21 14 41.86	+61 42 31.0	0.01	36	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1271 00 01 33.91	+67 16 42.2	0.01	36	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1582 05 31 48.43	+12 32 09.2	0.011	39.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1533 04 36 14.57	+24 55 04.4	0.011	39.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1024 21 42 16.37	+47 31 44.4	0.011	39.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1079 21 32 37.06	+54 43 19.9	0.011	39.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1211 22 46 53.74	+62 10 50.5	0.011	39.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 148	16 46 25.66	-14 10 22.1	0.012	43.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 361	17 52 00.12	-12 10 41.2	0.012	43.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 423	18 27 45.72	-10 13 04.8	0.012	43.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1620 05 36 33.55	-00 08 12.1	0.012	43.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 958	20 58 58.80	+48 06 42.8	0.012	43.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1439 05 00 56.35	+52 04 23.9	0.012	43.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1067 21 09 24.84	+56 42 15.1	0.012	43.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1136 21 45 29.66	+59 58 52.7	0.012	43.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 931	20 47 45.96	+43 51 06.8	0.013	46.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1008 21 26 45.94	+49 03 04.0	0.013	46.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1087 21 35 34.08	+56 33 27.7	0.013	46.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1290 00 41 54.86	+61 06 26.6	0.013	46.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1231 23 18 11.16	+61 16 24.6	0.013	46.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 521	18 52 28.49	-05 54 18.4	0.014	50.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 482	18 19 09.70	-05 06 42.1	0.014	50.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 949	21 19 22.75	+43 31 43.3	0.014	50.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 224	18 08 32.76	-23 29 29.4	0.015	54	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 611	18 55 40.06	-00 16 04.4	0.015	54	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 643	19 24 04.49	+04 49 54.5	0.015	54	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1607 06 30 45.79	+10 17 51.7	0.015	54	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 880	20 13 46.42	+40 19 09.1	0.015	54	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1042 21 49 12.38	+47 24 01.1	0.015	54	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1124 21 41 32.42	+58 13 43.0	0.015	54	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1128 21 41 31.61	+58 33 42.8	0.015	54	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1139 21 55 37.20	+58 34 16.3	0.015	54	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1298 00 43 25.66	+61 06 25.6	0.015	54	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1346 01 57 05.62	+62 37 37.9	0.015	54	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1345 01 57 05.66	+62 38 38.0	0.015	54	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 175	17 18 19.68	-18 31 07.7	0.016	57.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 532	18 47 08.76	-04 21 41.0	0.016	57.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 468	18 00 37.82	-03 30 02.9	0.016	57.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1616 05 06 29.78	-03 26 02.8	0.016	57.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 507	18 15 00.79	-02 37 00.1	0.016	57.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 619	19 18 05.38	-01 27 30.2	0.016	57.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1609 06 36 15.94	+10 27 28.1	0.016	57.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 688	19 38 46.54	+10 28 54.1	0.016	57.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 991	21 02 18.22	+50 52 53.4	0.016	57.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1018 21 04 31.66	+53 17 00.2	0.016	57.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1791 16 59 36.48	-22 35 27.2	0.017	61.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 39	17 11 36.70	-22 29 36.6	0.017	61.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 121	16 39 49.30	-14 00 49.3	0.017	61.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 425	17 46 51.17	-04 41 03.1	0.017	61.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1401 04 28 01.75	+55 12 39.6	0.017	61.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1195 22 26 45.34	+61 15 19.1	0.017	61.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1733 17 12 27.89	-29 00 33.1	0.018	64.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 455	18 37 44.35	-09 07 21.7	0.018	64.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1640 05 33 26.98	-05 47 58.9	0.018	64.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 597	18 50 45.67	+00 04 34.7	0.018	64.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 732	19 19 40.66	+20 10 36.8	0.018	64.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1052 21 47 52.99	+48 07 58.1	0.018	64.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1078 21 36 39.72	+54 03 30.2	0.018	64.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1393 04 12 57.72	+54 47 39.1	0.018	64.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1397 04 20 59.42	+54 52 07.7	0.018	64.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1137 21 51 34.42	+59 04 07.3	0.018	64.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1610 06 37 57.94	+10 27 20.5	0.019	68.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 735	19 22 10.44	+20 25 47.3	0.019	68.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 982	21 02 26.18	+49 54 53.6	0.019	68.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1433 04 50 54.82	+51 55 05.9	0.019	68.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1426 04 46 57.82	+53 05 22.2	0.019	68.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1376 02 43 50.21	+60 32 42.4	0.019	68.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1690 16 26 48.96	-24 02 42.4	0.02	72	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 421	17 54 16.51	-05 48 31.0	0.02	72	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 562	19 02 38.86	-04 30 34.9	0.02	72	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 655	19 20 18.34	+08 32 39.1	0.02	72	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1031 21 45 53.74	+47 13 53.4	0.02	72	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1200 22 45 58.49	+58 45 49.0	0.02	72	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1275 00 06 37.42	+67 26 42.0	0.02	72	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1221 22 28 25.94	+69 00 22.0	0.02	72	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1215 22 51 56.50	+62 05 57.1	0.021	75.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1343 01 56 04.56	+62 24 40.3	0.021	75.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 451	18 21 42.07	-07 08 31.2	0.022	79.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 501	18 17 37.58	-03 18 48.6	0.022	79.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1041 20 38 12.94	+57 30 36.4	0.022	79.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1682 17 08 14.45	-32 05 51.4	0.023	82.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 21	17 29 05.88	-25 56 21.5	0.023	82.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 107	17 26 00.77	-22 17 34.4	0.023	82.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 729	19 40 20.93	+17 17 00.6	0.023	82.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 722	19 24 12.96	+18 25 55.6	0.023	82.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 730	19 20 10.99	+19 55 39.0	0.023	82.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1065 21 07 24.62	+56 32 09.2	0.023	82.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 707	19 48 39.72	+11 27 33.1	0.024	86.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1455 03 28 04.08	+30 10 22.1	0.025	90	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1404 04 30 02.30	+55 16 31.4	0.025	90	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1063 21 07 25.08	+56 22 09.1	0.025	90	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1152 20 34 24.91	+68 00 24.5	0.025	90	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1027 21 06 32.02	+53 22 06.2	0.026	93.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1489 04 04 44.69	+26 28 08.8	0.027	97.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1441 04 00 06.70	+41 33 27.0	0.027	97.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1017 21 25 19.63	+50 10 00.1	0.027	97.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1074 21 34 39.41	+53 53 25.1	0.027	97.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1068 21 06 16.73	+57 07 05.9	0.027	97.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1144 21 50 31.44	+60 07 04.8	0.027	97.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 896	20 41 51.55	+39 40 47.3	0.028	100.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1707 17 13 12.89	-30 58 30.0	0.029	104.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 758	19 46 43.25	+18 57 25.6	0.029	104.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 973	21 37 27.07	+43 13 32.2	0.029	104.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1295 00 44 50.02	+52 26 24.4	0.029	104.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1257 23 57 31.87	+59 39 42.1	0.029	104.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1462 04 00 17.02	+36 58 26.4	0.03	108	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1725 17 19 12.19	-30 23 04.2	0.032	115.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1429 04 47 54.96	+52 05 18.2	0.032	115.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1053 20 59 24.34	+55 41 44.5	0.033	118.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1699 17 15 32.90	-32 11 20.0	0.034	122.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1705 17 20 14.98	-32 07 59.9	0.034	122.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 112	17 25 00.19	-21 52 39.0	0.034	122.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1392 04 13 58.94	+55 07 35.0	0.034	122.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1370 02 31 45.17	+60 28 15.6	0.035	126	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 90	17 39 34.51	-24 51 36.0	0.036	129.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1698 17 15 14.93	-32 13 21.4	0.038	136.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1736 17 10 08.90	-28 23 43.1	0.038	136.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1619 06 04 38.59	+04 09 45.4	0.038	136.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 302	17 57 31.01	-17 40 17.4	0.04	144	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 443	18 32 44.38	-09 07 43.3	0.045	162	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1608 06 36 46.34	+10 47 25.8	0.045	162	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1013 21 00 30.36	+53 21 47.9	0.048	172.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1026 21 01 29.06	+54 01 50.9	0.048	172.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1547 05 16 06.19	+26 23 17.5	0.049	176.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1015 21 00 29.95	+53 31 48.0	0.049	176.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 227	18 10 02.98	-23 39 22.7	0.05	180	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 288	17 57 56.09	-18 30 15.5	0.05	180	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 566	18 50 36.91	-02 46 26.0	0.05	180	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 510	18 14 36.34	-02 14 01.7	0.05	180	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1556 04 37 22.66	+16 55 59.5	0.05	180	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1070 21 46 48.24	+51 03 55.4	0.05	180	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 990	20 58 52.51	+51 16 42.6	0.051	183.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1563 05 01 49.56	+13 49 17.8	0.052	187.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 83	16 34 19.44	-14 16 11.6	0.056	201.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1583 05 28 47.81	+12 02 22.2	0.057	205.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1594 05 44 44.28	+09 01 12.7	0.059	212.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1359 02 25 47.38	+62 03 31.0	0.061	219.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 146	16 56 22.06	-15 59 40.6	0.066	237.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1601 06 29 48.31	+12 22 56.3	0.066	237.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1598 05 52 25.51	+08 20 39.1	0.072	259.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 657	19 21 23.95	+08 53 43.4	0.075	270	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 975	21 11 44.21	+47 52 21.4	0.075	270	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 141	16 50 51.02	-15 15 04.0	0.077	277.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1765 16 44 58.22	-21 15 28.4	0.079	284.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1003 20 59 32.35	+52 21 45.0	0.079	284.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1153 22 00 38.33	+58 59 27.6	0.079	284.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 996	20 57 32.74	+51 56 38.8	0.08	288	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1740 16 36 11.09	-22 13 04.4	0.084	302.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 583	18 33 33.02	+00 37 20.6	0.084	302.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1445 04 32 08.93	+46 36 22.3	0.084	302.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 445	18 37 44.93	-09 37 21.7	0.086	309.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1778 15 39 52.49	-07 09 40.0	0.086	309.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 67	17 13 59.95	-21 53 26.2	0.088	316.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1036 20 38 13.94	+57 10 36.1	0.088	316.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1543 04 27 24.60	+18 51 40.0	0.09	324	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1507 04 43 09.65	+29 45 36.4	0.09	324	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1071 20 58 17.04	+58 11 41.3	0.092	331.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 212	18 11 03.91	-24 19 18.5	0.093	334.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 587	18 39 33.70	+00 02 46.7	0.093	334.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 520	18 21 36.43	-02 18 31.3	0.097	349.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1471 03 47 57.72	+32 54 11.9	0.097	349.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1744 16 39 59.30	-22 15 49.0	0.099	356.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 941	20 56 44.40	+45 49 35.8	0.105	378	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1710 17 20 44.69	-31 56 57.8	0.106	381.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 185	17 31 58.20	-20 17 08.9	0.108	388.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1035 21 44 40.70	+47 43 50.2	0.109	392.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1082 20 51 08.28	+60 11 19.0	0.111	399.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 950	21 00 31.85	+46 36 47.5	0.112	403.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 761	19 36 10.18	+21 06 43.9	0.116	417.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1749 17 23 10.27	-29 02 47.0	0.117	421.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1498 04 11 01.20	+24 57 44.6	0.118	424.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1468 03 40 06.89	+31 24 40.0	0.12	432	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1407 04 29 59.06	+54 16 31.8	0.13	468	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 717	19 16 13.22	+18 00 22.7	0.147	529.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 604	18 51 33.50	+00 13 38.3	0.152	547.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 191	16 47 48.02	-12 45 16.2	0.158	568.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 437	18 20 13.08	-07 58 37.6	0.163	586.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1399 04 24 00.74	+55 06 55.4	0.163	586.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1394 04 17 00.05	+55 17 23.3	0.184	662.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 684	19 21 49.97	+12 25 45.5	0.185	666	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1251 22 36 03.05	+75 15 34.9	0.195	702	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 978	21 01 08.28	+49 41 49.6	0.2	720	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1681 16 27 01.92	-24 46 41.5	0.206	741.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 564	18 37 35.14	-01 12 22.0	0.208	748.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 134	15 53 38.26	-04 38 49.9	0.22	792	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 636	19 06 28.54	+04 39 41.4	0.22	792	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1529 04 32 01.73	+24 26 21.5	0.223	802.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 183	15 53 54.77	-03 08 48.8	0.24	864	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 192	17 30 57.53	-19 47 13.2	0.278	1000.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 582	18 52 35.98	-01 56 17.5	0.283	1018.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1756 17 16 07.63	-27 23 17.5	0.285	1026	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1746 17 11 07.46	-27 23 38.8	0.306	1101.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1524 04 28 01.75	+24 36 37.4	0.324	1166.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1470 03 43 07.75	+31 49 29.3	0.403	1450.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1719 16 19 55.78	-20 07 09.5	0.61	2196	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 617	18 57 32.54	+01 04 03.7	0.745	2682	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 406	18 25 47.62	-11 48 13.7	0.746	2685.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1534 04 40 03.67	+25 35 48.8	0.87	3132	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 548	18 49 37.97	-03 41 30.1	1	3600	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1712 16 38 02.02	-24 25 57.0	1.56	5616	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1495 04 18 05.11	+27 37 17.4	2.6	9360	5&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mcdonald</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://vmcoolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/index.php?title=Talk:Lynds_Target_Selection&amp;diff=2978</id>
		<title>Talk:Lynds Target Selection</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://vmcoolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/index.php?title=Talk:Lynds_Target_Selection&amp;diff=2978"/>
		<updated>2008-01-14T19:34:44Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mcdonald: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Dear Lynds&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I hope you all made it home safe and sound.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wednesday night as I was driving home the sky was GREAT.  Very dark and the&lt;br /&gt;
Milky Way sure stood out.  I looked but did not see any nebula.  :)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using http://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov I did a search and got a list of Lynds nebula&lt;br /&gt;
with ra, dec, cloud area in degrees squared and rating of opacity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I placed list on excel and sorted by opacity and then area.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hopefully the list will be below for all 6 and 5 lens nebula.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does any one know about what area we can look at in 1 hour?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
later&lt;br /&gt;
david&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
name, ra, dec, cloud area (degree squared), area in arcmin squared I think,&lt;br /&gt;
opacity&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 53	17 23 08.90	-23 54 47.2	0.001	3.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 233	17 45 03.98	-20 01 11.6	0.001	3.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 222	17 41 09.65	-19 46 28.9	0.001	3.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 223	17 40 45.55	-19 42 30.6	0.001	3.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 231	17 40 21.31	-19 31 32.2	0.001	3.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 307	18 06 14.02	-18 26 39.1	0.001	3.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 308	18 06 43.99	-18 25 36.8	0.001	3.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 328	18 16 55.39	-17 59 52.4	0.001	3.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 372	18 30 34.82	-16 03 52.9	0.001	3.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 860	20 04 52.13	+36 03 36.0	0.001	3.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 953	21 21 23.38	+43 22 49.1	0.001	3.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 917	20 40 14.09	+44 08 42.0	0.001	3.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1021 21 21 35.04	+51 01 49.8	0.001	3.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1166 22 05 39.19	+59 34 38.3	0.001	3.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1233 23 16 27.19	+62 20 23.3	0.001	3.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 228	17 40 45.43	-19 37 30.4	0.002	7.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 229	17 40 09.29	-19 30 33.1	0.002	7.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 495	18 38 53.45	-06 39 16.6	0.002	7.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 490	18 15 08.18	-03 48 59.8	0.002	7.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 709	19 14 15.07	+16 25 14.5	0.002	7.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 944	21 17 40.73	+43 17 38.4	0.002	7.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1389 04 04 32.83	+56 54 11.5	0.002	7.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1111 21 39 32.45	+57 53 38.0	0.002	7.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1246 23 25 12.84	+63 36 29.9	0.002	7.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 108	18 10 09.72	-28 19 22.4	0.003	10.8	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 55	17 23 02.86	-23 52 47.6	0.003	10.8	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 57	17 22 38.64	-23 43 49.1	0.003	10.8	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 226	17 40 33.48	-19 39 31.3	0.003	10.8	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 509	18 53 42.10	-07 18 13.0	0.003	10.8	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 675	19 23 57.53	+11 05 54.2	0.003	10.8	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 928	20 41 01.44	+44 35 44.9	0.003	10.8	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1103 21 41 41.90	+56 43 43.3	0.003	10.8	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 310	18 06 55.90	-18 21 36.0	0.004	14.4	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 603	18 46 20.74	+00 53 15.7	0.004	14.4	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 918	20 40 56.30	+44 05 44.5	0.004	14.4	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1014 21 24 01.58	+49 59 56.8	0.004	14.4	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1234 23 17 09.50	+62 24 23.8	0.004	14.4	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1357 02 52 30.05	+68 52 18.1	0.004	14.4	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 416	18 25 16.22	-10 38 15.7	0.005	18	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 531	19 06 05.47	-06 50 20.8	0.005	18	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 502	18 07 29.90	-01 51 32.8	0.005	18	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 663	19 36 55.68	+07 33 46.4	0.005	18	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 771	19 20 42.43	+23 31 41.5	0.005	18	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 881	20 17 47.78	+39 49 23.9	0.005	18	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 951	21 21 05.42	+43 18 48.2	0.005	18	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 922	20 38 43.03	+44 35 37.0	0.005	18	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1049 20 42 14.09	+57 30 49.7	0.005	18	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 52	17 32 11.09	-25 21 07.9	0.006	21.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 436	18 14 42.41	-07 24 01.8	0.006	21.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 460	17 58 38.11	-03 45 11.9	0.006	21.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 676	19 21 33.00	+11 30 44.3	0.006	21.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 677	19 22 20.95	+11 33 47.5	0.006	21.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1185 22 29 20.52	+59 05 23.3	0.006	21.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1155 20 43 31.08	+67 40 55.2	0.006	21.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1358 02 55 34.85	+69 22 09.1	0.006	21.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 25	17 32 30.29	-26 11 06.7	0.007	25.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1689 16 32 02.59	-25 05 21.5	0.007	25.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 111	17 15 09.98	-20 21 21.2	0.007	25.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 422	18 11 43.30	-08 09 14.8	0.007	25.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 543	19 06 40.70	-06 10 18.1	0.007	25.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 470	18 18 40.42	-05 43 44.4	0.007	25.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 877	20 14 17.18	+39 54 10.8	0.007	25.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 915	20 45 22.78	+43 05 59.3	0.007	25.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1355 02 52 43.18	+69 02 17.5	0.007	25.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1333 02 26 03.67	+75 28 32.2	0.007	25.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1775 16 57 00.70	-22 49 38.3	0.008	28.8	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 438	18 14 12.10	-07 09 04.0	0.008	28.8	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 432	17 58 40.46	-05 45 11.5	0.008	28.8	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 503	18 29 09.12	-04 37 58.4	0.008	28.8	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 492	18 15 38.18	-03 48 57.6	0.008	28.8	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 763	19 18 36.48	+23 25 32.9	0.008	28.8	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 66	17 24 02.42	-23 32 43.1	0.009	32.4	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 262	18 02 59.38	-20 59 53.5	0.009	32.4	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 129	16 54 58.44	-16 19 46.6	0.009	32.4	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1552 05 17 41.76	+26 03 10.4	0.009	32.4	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1253 23 56 31.49	+58 31 41.9	0.009	32.4	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1197 22 37 54.62	+58 55 37.2	0.009	32.4	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1704 16 30 48.82	-23 46 26.4	0.01	36	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1527 04 39 04.51	+26 15 52.9	0.01	36	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1172 21 02 40.27	+67 41 56.0	0.01	36	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 216	17 37 57.46	-19 39 42.8	0.011	39.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 330	17 50 26.71	-14 16 48.0	0.011	39.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 648	18 39 18.89	+12 42 46.1	0.011	39.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 11	17 08 07.15	-22 53 51.4	0.012	43.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 466	18 19 40.92	-06 08 39.8	0.012	43.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 698	19 26 07.30	+13 06 03.2	0.012	43.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1768 17 20 06.98	-26 52 00.1	0.013	46.8	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1148 20 40 31.75	+67 20 45.2	0.015	54	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1772 17 19 48.65	-26 38 01.7	0.016	57.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1686 16 25 49.27	-24 19 46.6	0.016	57.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 323	18 15 31.63	-18 10 58.4	0.016	57.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 769	19 24 07.15	+23 05 55.3	0.016	57.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1512 05 03 45.34	+32 47 10.3	0.016	57.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1523 05 06 13.80	+31 43 59.9	0.017	61.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 239	18 33 24.05	-26 00 41.0	0.018	64.8	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 104	17 15 58.58	-20 48 17.6	0.019	68.4	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1165 22 07 10.90	+59 04 41.5	0.019	68.4	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1164 22 06 40.51	+59 09 40.3	0.019	68.4	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 173	17 17 13.49	-18 23 12.1	0.02	72	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 122	16 55 10.94	-16 44 45.6	0.02	72	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1143 21 57 37.08	+58 59 20.8	0.02	72	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 31	16 49 55.68	-19 05 07.8	0.022	79.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 539	18 23 58.99	-01 04 21.0	0.022	79.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 567	19 04 08.81	-04 28 28.6	0.024	86.4	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1759 16 52 06.84	-23 04 58.8	0.027	97.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 497	18 39 11.40	-06 37 15.2	0.027	97.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1774 17 22 37.27	-27 00 49.3	0.029	104.4	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 255	16 47 44.76	-09 55 16.3	0.032	115.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 981	20 59 36.94	+50 11 44.9	0.033	118.8	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 588	18 36 04.27	-00 27 28.4	0.034	122.4	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 102	17 22 30.14	-21 52 49.8	0.035	126	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1773 17 21 06.91	-26 47 56.0	0.036	129.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 7	17 28 36.36	-26 17 23.6	0.036	129.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1696 16 28 49.42	-24 19 34.3	0.036	129.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 63	16 49 54.43	-18 05 07.8	0.037	133.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1235 22 14 54.79	+73 24 58.0	0.037	133.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 74	17 38 04.97	-25 11 42.4	0.038	136.8	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 235	17 46 28.22	-20 11 05.6	0.038	136.8	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 483	18 17 39.36	-04 48 48.6	0.038	136.8	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 462	18 06 39.17	-04 39 36.7	0.041	147.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 15	17 04 24.07	-22 10 07.0	0.043	154.8	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1551 04 31 23.86	+18 06 23.8	0.043	154.8	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 778	19 27 06.53	+23 41 07.4	0.043	154.8	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1782 16 41 56.23	-19 45 41.0	0.047	169.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1517 04 55 11.50	+30 34 46.2	0.051	183.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 158	16 47 49.58	-14 05 16.4	0.056	201.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1757 16 31 55.66	-19 36 21.6	0.061	219.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1627 05 46 33.74	+00 01 04.4	0.063	226.8	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 570	18 26 34.30	-00 28 09.5	0.066	237.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1262 23 26 58.97	+74 16 31.1	0.066	237.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 429	18 16 43.49	-08 18 52.9	0.068	244.8	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 43	16 34 27.26	-15 50 11.4	0.07	252	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 581	19 07 26.16	-03 55 14.9	0.072	259.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 260	16 47 44.38	-09 35 16.4	0.074	266.4	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 100	17 15 58.68	-20 53 17.9	0.075	270	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 219	17 39 27.62	-19 46 36.1	0.084	302.4	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 65	17 12 59.93	-21 53 30.5	0.088	316.8	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 704	19 26 48.55	+13 46 05.9	0.097	349.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1709 16 33 00.91	-23 46 17.4	0.099	356.4	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 694	19 40 40.06	+10 57 01.4	0.109	392.4	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1544 05 04 04.18	+25 14 08.5	0.109	392.4	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1535 04 35 31.20	+23 54 07.2	0.111	399.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1622 05 54 36.07	+02 00 29.2	0.122	439.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 162	16 49 07.80	-14 15 10.8	0.124	446.4	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 530	18 49 39.22	-04 46 30.4	0.124	446.4	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 513	18 10 35.54	-01 33 19.4	0.127	457.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 204	16 47 47.26	-12 05 16.4	0.167	601.2	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 557	18 38 35.81	-01 47 17.5	0.181	651.6	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 673	19 20 51.26	+11 15 41.4	0.199	716.4	6&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1506 04 20 02.16	+25 17 09.6	0.334	1202.4	6&lt;br /&gt;
					&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 199	18 15 05.47	-25 27 00.7	0.001	3.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 210	18 09 09.65	-24 07 26.8	0.001	3.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 213	18 09 03.48	-24 00 27.0	0.001	3.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 214	18 09 03.43	-23 58 27.1	0.001	3.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 87	17 18 35.95	-21 48 06.5	0.001	3.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 105	16 36 25.13	-13 57 03.2	0.001	3.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 106	16 36 43.15	-13 57 02.2	0.001	3.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 598	18 46 44.93	+00 43 17.4	0.001	3.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 601	18 46 44.83	+00 48 17.6	0.001	3.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 635	19 09 29.16	+04 07 54.1	0.001	3.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 656	19 21 18.43	+08 27 43.2	0.001	3.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1581 05 29 24.02	+12 12 19.4	0.001	3.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 948	21 20 41.42	+43 14 47.0	0.001	3.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 902	20 21 42.38	+43 19 37.9	0.001	3.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 946	21 18 58.75	+43 27 42.1	0.001	3.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 952	21 20 29.06	+43 27 46.4	0.001	3.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 919	20 32 40.68	+45 17 16.4	0.001	3.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 920	20 32 40.58	+45 20 16.4	0.001	3.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 997	21 26 36.14	+47 41 03.5	0.001	3.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1001 21 27 18.31	+47 41 05.6	0.001	3.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1423 04 44 58.34	+53 20 30.5	0.001	3.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1064 21 13 28.85	+55 37 27.1	0.001	3.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1080 21 21 29.23	+56 32 49.9	0.001	3.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1120 21 47 37.18	+57 08 57.8	0.001	3.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1118 21 46 36.65	+57 12 55.4	0.001	3.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1380 03 15 42.50	+60 09 05.0	0.001	3.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1378 03 14 54.89	+60 20 07.8	0.001	3.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1255 23 53 29.76	+60 31 41.5	0.001	3.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1340 02 30 44.26	+72 57 19.4	0.001	3.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1724 17 31 45.46	-32 13 10.2	0.002	7.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1735 17 32 08.66	-31 43 08.4	0.002	7.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1727 17 12 10.20	-29 13 34.3	0.002	7.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 196	18 10 04.85	-24 59 22.6	0.002	7.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 23	17 17 14.83	-23 58 12.4	0.002	7.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 101	17 21 48.02	-21 47 52.8	0.002	7.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 551	18 57 50.78	-04 25 55.2	0.002	7.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 504	18 18 37.39	-03 08 44.5	0.002	7.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 605	18 46 44.74	+00 53 17.5	0.002	7.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 774	19 22 54.65	+23 25 50.5	0.002	7.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 853	20 06 53.59	+35 13 43.3	0.002	7.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 882	20 19 18.26	+39 39 29.2	0.002	7.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 979	21 39 27.34	+43 21 37.1	0.002	7.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 921	20 33 10.80	+45 16 18.1	0.002	7.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 926	20 35 23.09	+45 19 25.7	0.002	7.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 925	20 33 40.75	+45 20 20.0	0.002	7.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 929	20 35 41.11	+45 20 26.9	0.002	7.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 930	20 36 53.35	+45 20 30.8	0.002	7.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1420 04 32 53.50	+52 16 19.6	0.002	7.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1077 21 37 40.70	+53 43 32.9	0.002	7.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1412 04 37 00.65	+54 26 03.1	0.002	7.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1115 21 46 37.15	+56 58 55.2	0.002	7.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1113 21 44 35.93	+57 11 50.3	0.002	7.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1179 22 27 19.73	+59 02 19.7	0.002	7.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1142 21 56 36.48	+59 04 18.8	0.002	7.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1379 03 15 31.15	+60 21 05.8	0.002	7.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1317 01 23 04.92	+61 50 39.5	0.002	7.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1230 23 14 08.30	+62 01 21.4	0.002	7.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1294 00 42 20.14	+62 16 26.4	0.002	7.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1193 22 14 36.86	+62 24 56.5	0.002	7.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1301 00 43 45.10	+62 27 25.2	0.002	7.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1094 20 32 46.30	+64 00 18.4	0.002	7.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1263 23 57 31.42	+64 50 42.0	0.002	7.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1171 20 53 31.99	+68 19 27.5	0.002	7.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1738 17 32 56.66	-31 43 05.2	0.003	10.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1715 17 12 11.71	-30 13 34.3	0.003	10.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 230	18 09 02.71	-23 27 27.0	0.003	10.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 417	18 25 16.18	-10 36 15.8	0.003	10.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 430	18 11 42.67	-07 37 14.9	0.003	10.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 518	18 53 11.30	-06 36 15.1	0.003	10.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 479	18 19 09.74	-05 08 42.0	0.003	10.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 469	18 13 27.70	-05 06 06.8	0.003	10.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 883	20 19 48.34	+39 39 31.0	0.003	10.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 956	21 11 35.35	+45 58 21.0	0.003	10.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 960	21 08 32.66	+47 10 12.0	0.003	10.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1019 21 20 59.02	+50 56 48.1	0.003	10.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1016 21 19 46.58	+51 00 44.6	0.003	10.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1437 04 59 20.18	+52 04 30.4	0.003	10.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1410 04 36 01.85	+54 51 07.2	0.003	10.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1403 04 28 31.78	+55 11 37.7	0.003	10.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1062 21 13 29.06	+55 32 26.9	0.003	10.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1123 21 39 31.03	+58 28 37.9	0.003	10.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1351 02 10 43.22	+60 49 07.7	0.003	10.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1339 01 54 34.08	+62 30 43.2	0.003	10.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1326 01 30 41.30	+63 05 27.6	0.003	10.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1325 01 29 52.87	+63 05 29.0	0.003	10.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1168 20 56 37.75	+67 36 37.1	0.003	10.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1219 22 11 35.54	+70 59 51.0	0.003	10.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1685 17 09 14.57	-32 08 47.0	0.004	14.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 36	17 28 40.82	-25 12 23.0	0.004	14.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 58	17 30 28.46	-24 55 15.6	0.004	14.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 24	17 17 32.93	-24 01 11.3	0.004	14.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 4	17 02 30.05	-22 12 15.1	0.004	14.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 427	18 26 45.22	-09 48 09.4	0.004	14.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 498	18 39 59.42	-06 39 11.9	0.004	14.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 500	18 16 37.61	-03 18 52.9	0.004	14.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1614 05 35 32.98	-00 38 07.8	0.004	14.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1491 04 04 38.45	+26 17 09.2	0.004	14.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1464 04 00 40.61	+36 40 24.6	0.004	14.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 879	20 20 49.01	+39 19 34.7	0.004	14.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1117 21 38 31.06	+58 18 35.3	0.004	14.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1127 21 40 55.37	+58 33 41.4	0.004	14.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1169 22 07 09.48	+59 44 41.6	0.004	14.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1385 03 21 01.08	+59 48 47.5	0.004	14.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1322 01 24 16.49	+61 15 37.8	0.004	14.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1182 22 13 07.32	+61 54 53.6	0.004	14.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1229 23 14 08.33	+61 59 21.5	0.004	14.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1291 00 42 13.85	+62 01 26.4	0.004	14.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1191 22 14 06.62	+62 24 55.4	0.004	14.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1202 22 26 41.45	+63 05 19.0	0.004	14.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1723 17 31 15.41	-32 12 12.6	0.005	18	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1718 17 15 11.83	-30 14 21.5	0.005	18	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 80	17 39 04.87	-25 06 38.2	0.005	18	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 92	17 18 59.86	-21 43 04.8	0.005	18	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 89	17 18 29.81	-21 42 06.8	0.005	18	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 514	18 52 53.69	-06 56 16.4	0.005	18	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 576	18 31 28.18	-00 22 48.4	0.005	18	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 702	19 36 26.47	+12 16 44.8	0.005	18	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 725	19 28 13.42	+18 10 12.0	0.005	18	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 753	19 48 14.09	+18 17 31.6	0.005	18	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 903	20 08 37.06	+45 03 50.4	0.005	18	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1047 21 48 05.42	+47 51 58.7	0.005	18	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1417 04 40 59.64	+53 55 46.9	0.005	18	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1406 04 38 03.98	+55 23 58.9	0.005	18	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1299 00 45 04.20	+55 44 24.0	0.005	18	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1186 22 13 37.06	+62 07 54.5	0.005	18	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1178 22 09 04.34	+62 19 45.5	0.005	18	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1239 23 12 20.18	+66 04 19.6	0.005	18	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1157 20 39 27.17	+68 00 41.8	0.005	18	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1734 17 32 26.90	-31 52 07.3	0.006	21.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1714 17 12 11.83	-30 18 34.2	0.006	21.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1794 17 26 24.82	-26 38 33.0	0.006	21.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 402	18 29 48.70	-12 42 56.2	0.006	21.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 467	18 18 58.70	-05 58 43.0	0.006	21.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 549	19 02 09.70	-05 15 37.1	0.006	21.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 545	18 56 45.17	-04 46 00.1	0.006	21.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 687	19 38 34.61	+10 24 53.3	0.006	21.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 942	21 16 22.58	+43 12 34.9	0.006	21.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 961	21 08 50.62	+47 14 12.8	0.006	21.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 964	21 09 32.54	+47 22 14.9	0.006	21.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1424 04 44 58.08	+53 15 30.6	0.006	21.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1044 20 41 14.30	+57 20 46.3	0.006	21.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1126 21 39 30.84	+58 33 37.8	0.006	21.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1381 03 16 31.01	+60 13 02.3	0.006	21.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1213 22 31 38.62	+65 25 27.5	0.006	21.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1173 21 04 41.28	+67 42 02.2	0.006	21.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 93	18 02 45.00	-27 49 54.8	0.007	25.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1767 17 18 36.77	-26 45 06.8	0.007	25.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 109	17 39 03.46	-24 06 38.2	0.007	25.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1692 16 26 30.82	-23 56 43.8	0.007	25.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 401	18 38 07.94	-13 47 20.0	0.007	25.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1644 06 07 39.29	-05 30 28.1	0.007	25.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 544	19 01 33.89	-05 25 39.7	0.007	25.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 505	18 19 37.49	-03 13 40.1	0.007	25.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 613	18 56 46.15	-00 20 59.6	0.007	25.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 680	19 44 42.65	+08 38 17.5	0.007	25.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1416 04 40 00.02	+54 05 51.0	0.007	25.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1192 22 33 53.35	+58 35 30.8	0.007	25.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1100 20 34 47.04	+64 00 25.2	0.007	25.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1703 17 18 44.88	-32 06 06.5	0.008	28.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 166	18 02 05.11	-25 09 57.6	0.008	28.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 61	17 31 22.46	-24 55 11.6	0.008	28.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 211	18 09 33.67	-24 09 24.8	0.008	28.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 38	17 11 18.67	-22 28 37.9	0.008	28.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 578	18 31 10.32	-00 29 49.6	0.008	28.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1604 06 28 47.40	+11 38 00.6	0.008	28.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1503 04 40 21.74	+29 55 47.6	0.008	28.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 947	21 19 59.18	+43 18 45.0	0.008	28.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1099 21 36 32.52	+57 23 30.1	0.008	28.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1102 21 32 29.42	+58 03 19.8	0.008	28.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1121 21 40 31.92	+58 16 40.4	0.008	28.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1386 03 22 13.01	+59 40 43.7	0.008	28.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1076 20 49 20.81	+59 51 13.3	0.008	28.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1300 00 43 56.21	+61 26 25.1	0.008	28.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1227 23 10 05.81	+62 19 17.8	0.008	28.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 81	17 25 01.70	-23 00 38.9	0.009	32.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 360	17 51 42.22	-12 15 42.5	0.009	32.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1450 03 29 35.69	+31 20 16.8	0.009	32.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 987	21 00 48.24	+50 40 48.7	0.009	32.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1421 04 32 52.78	+52 01 19.9	0.009	32.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1430 04 48 55.22	+52 08 13.9	0.009	32.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 95	17 19 59.83	-21 41 00.6	0.01	36	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 411	18 27 47.21	-11 28 04.8	0.01	36	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 413	18 26 34.92	-11 13 10.2	0.01	36	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 414	18 24 16.46	-10 50 20.0	0.01	36	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 420	18 25 45.82	-10 18 13.7	0.01	36	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 392	17 53 43.70	-08 30 33.5	0.01	36	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 723	19 18 11.78	+19 13 30.7	0.01	36	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 782	19 28 06.24	+23 56 11.8	0.01	36	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 971	21 00 50.98	+49 18 49.0	0.01	36	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1431 04 47 54.72	+52 00 18.4	0.01	36	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1051 20 42 44.23	+57 30 51.5	0.01	36	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1119 21 13 11.26	+61 42 26.6	0.01	36	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1125 21 14 41.86	+61 42 31.0	0.01	36	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1271 00 01 33.91	+67 16 42.2	0.01	36	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1582 05 31 48.43	+12 32 09.2	0.011	39.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1533 04 36 14.57	+24 55 04.4	0.011	39.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1024 21 42 16.37	+47 31 44.4	0.011	39.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1079 21 32 37.06	+54 43 19.9	0.011	39.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1211 22 46 53.74	+62 10 50.5	0.011	39.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 148	16 46 25.66	-14 10 22.1	0.012	43.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 361	17 52 00.12	-12 10 41.2	0.012	43.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 423	18 27 45.72	-10 13 04.8	0.012	43.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1620 05 36 33.55	-00 08 12.1	0.012	43.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 958	20 58 58.80	+48 06 42.8	0.012	43.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1439 05 00 56.35	+52 04 23.9	0.012	43.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1067 21 09 24.84	+56 42 15.1	0.012	43.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1136 21 45 29.66	+59 58 52.7	0.012	43.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 931	20 47 45.96	+43 51 06.8	0.013	46.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1008 21 26 45.94	+49 03 04.0	0.013	46.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1087 21 35 34.08	+56 33 27.7	0.013	46.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1290 00 41 54.86	+61 06 26.6	0.013	46.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1231 23 18 11.16	+61 16 24.6	0.013	46.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 521	18 52 28.49	-05 54 18.4	0.014	50.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 482	18 19 09.70	-05 06 42.1	0.014	50.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 949	21 19 22.75	+43 31 43.3	0.014	50.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 224	18 08 32.76	-23 29 29.4	0.015	54	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 611	18 55 40.06	-00 16 04.4	0.015	54	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 643	19 24 04.49	+04 49 54.5	0.015	54	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1607 06 30 45.79	+10 17 51.7	0.015	54	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 880	20 13 46.42	+40 19 09.1	0.015	54	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1042 21 49 12.38	+47 24 01.1	0.015	54	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1124 21 41 32.42	+58 13 43.0	0.015	54	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1128 21 41 31.61	+58 33 42.8	0.015	54	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1139 21 55 37.20	+58 34 16.3	0.015	54	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1298 00 43 25.66	+61 06 25.6	0.015	54	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1346 01 57 05.62	+62 37 37.9	0.015	54	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1345 01 57 05.66	+62 38 38.0	0.015	54	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 175	17 18 19.68	-18 31 07.7	0.016	57.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 532	18 47 08.76	-04 21 41.0	0.016	57.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 468	18 00 37.82	-03 30 02.9	0.016	57.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1616 05 06 29.78	-03 26 02.8	0.016	57.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 507	18 15 00.79	-02 37 00.1	0.016	57.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 619	19 18 05.38	-01 27 30.2	0.016	57.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1609 06 36 15.94	+10 27 28.1	0.016	57.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 688	19 38 46.54	+10 28 54.1	0.016	57.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 991	21 02 18.22	+50 52 53.4	0.016	57.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1018 21 04 31.66	+53 17 00.2	0.016	57.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1791 16 59 36.48	-22 35 27.2	0.017	61.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 39	17 11 36.70	-22 29 36.6	0.017	61.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 121	16 39 49.30	-14 00 49.3	0.017	61.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 425	17 46 51.17	-04 41 03.1	0.017	61.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1401 04 28 01.75	+55 12 39.6	0.017	61.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1195 22 26 45.34	+61 15 19.1	0.017	61.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1733 17 12 27.89	-29 00 33.1	0.018	64.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 455	18 37 44.35	-09 07 21.7	0.018	64.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1640 05 33 26.98	-05 47 58.9	0.018	64.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 597	18 50 45.67	+00 04 34.7	0.018	64.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 732	19 19 40.66	+20 10 36.8	0.018	64.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1052 21 47 52.99	+48 07 58.1	0.018	64.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1078 21 36 39.72	+54 03 30.2	0.018	64.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1393 04 12 57.72	+54 47 39.1	0.018	64.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1397 04 20 59.42	+54 52 07.7	0.018	64.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1137 21 51 34.42	+59 04 07.3	0.018	64.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1610 06 37 57.94	+10 27 20.5	0.019	68.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 735	19 22 10.44	+20 25 47.3	0.019	68.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 982	21 02 26.18	+49 54 53.6	0.019	68.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1433 04 50 54.82	+51 55 05.9	0.019	68.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1426 04 46 57.82	+53 05 22.2	0.019	68.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1376 02 43 50.21	+60 32 42.4	0.019	68.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1690 16 26 48.96	-24 02 42.4	0.02	72	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 421	17 54 16.51	-05 48 31.0	0.02	72	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 562	19 02 38.86	-04 30 34.9	0.02	72	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 655	19 20 18.34	+08 32 39.1	0.02	72	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1031 21 45 53.74	+47 13 53.4	0.02	72	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1200 22 45 58.49	+58 45 49.0	0.02	72	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1275 00 06 37.42	+67 26 42.0	0.02	72	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1221 22 28 25.94	+69 00 22.0	0.02	72	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1215 22 51 56.50	+62 05 57.1	0.021	75.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1343 01 56 04.56	+62 24 40.3	0.021	75.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 451	18 21 42.07	-07 08 31.2	0.022	79.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 501	18 17 37.58	-03 18 48.6	0.022	79.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1041 20 38 12.94	+57 30 36.4	0.022	79.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1682 17 08 14.45	-32 05 51.4	0.023	82.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 21	17 29 05.88	-25 56 21.5	0.023	82.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 107	17 26 00.77	-22 17 34.4	0.023	82.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 729	19 40 20.93	+17 17 00.6	0.023	82.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 722	19 24 12.96	+18 25 55.6	0.023	82.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 730	19 20 10.99	+19 55 39.0	0.023	82.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1065 21 07 24.62	+56 32 09.2	0.023	82.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 707	19 48 39.72	+11 27 33.1	0.024	86.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1455 03 28 04.08	+30 10 22.1	0.025	90	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1404 04 30 02.30	+55 16 31.4	0.025	90	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1063 21 07 25.08	+56 22 09.1	0.025	90	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1152 20 34 24.91	+68 00 24.5	0.025	90	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1027 21 06 32.02	+53 22 06.2	0.026	93.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1489 04 04 44.69	+26 28 08.8	0.027	97.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1441 04 00 06.70	+41 33 27.0	0.027	97.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1017 21 25 19.63	+50 10 00.1	0.027	97.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1074 21 34 39.41	+53 53 25.1	0.027	97.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1068 21 06 16.73	+57 07 05.9	0.027	97.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1144 21 50 31.44	+60 07 04.8	0.027	97.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 896	20 41 51.55	+39 40 47.3	0.028	100.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1707 17 13 12.89	-30 58 30.0	0.029	104.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 758	19 46 43.25	+18 57 25.6	0.029	104.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 973	21 37 27.07	+43 13 32.2	0.029	104.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1295 00 44 50.02	+52 26 24.4	0.029	104.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1257 23 57 31.87	+59 39 42.1	0.029	104.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1462 04 00 17.02	+36 58 26.4	0.03	108	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1725 17 19 12.19	-30 23 04.2	0.032	115.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1429 04 47 54.96	+52 05 18.2	0.032	115.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1053 20 59 24.34	+55 41 44.5	0.033	118.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1699 17 15 32.90	-32 11 20.0	0.034	122.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1705 17 20 14.98	-32 07 59.9	0.034	122.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 112	17 25 00.19	-21 52 39.0	0.034	122.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1392 04 13 58.94	+55 07 35.0	0.034	122.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1370 02 31 45.17	+60 28 15.6	0.035	126	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 90	17 39 34.51	-24 51 36.0	0.036	129.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1698 17 15 14.93	-32 13 21.4	0.038	136.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1736 17 10 08.90	-28 23 43.1	0.038	136.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1619 06 04 38.59	+04 09 45.4	0.038	136.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 302	17 57 31.01	-17 40 17.4	0.04	144	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 443	18 32 44.38	-09 07 43.3	0.045	162	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1608 06 36 46.34	+10 47 25.8	0.045	162	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1013 21 00 30.36	+53 21 47.9	0.048	172.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1026 21 01 29.06	+54 01 50.9	0.048	172.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1547 05 16 06.19	+26 23 17.5	0.049	176.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1015 21 00 29.95	+53 31 48.0	0.049	176.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 227	18 10 02.98	-23 39 22.7	0.05	180	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 288	17 57 56.09	-18 30 15.5	0.05	180	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 566	18 50 36.91	-02 46 26.0	0.05	180	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 510	18 14 36.34	-02 14 01.7	0.05	180	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1556 04 37 22.66	+16 55 59.5	0.05	180	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1070 21 46 48.24	+51 03 55.4	0.05	180	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 990	20 58 52.51	+51 16 42.6	0.051	183.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1563 05 01 49.56	+13 49 17.8	0.052	187.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 83	16 34 19.44	-14 16 11.6	0.056	201.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1583 05 28 47.81	+12 02 22.2	0.057	205.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1594 05 44 44.28	+09 01 12.7	0.059	212.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1359 02 25 47.38	+62 03 31.0	0.061	219.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 146	16 56 22.06	-15 59 40.6	0.066	237.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1601 06 29 48.31	+12 22 56.3	0.066	237.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1598 05 52 25.51	+08 20 39.1	0.072	259.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 657	19 21 23.95	+08 53 43.4	0.075	270	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 975	21 11 44.21	+47 52 21.4	0.075	270	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 141	16 50 51.02	-15 15 04.0	0.077	277.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1765 16 44 58.22	-21 15 28.4	0.079	284.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1003 20 59 32.35	+52 21 45.0	0.079	284.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1153 22 00 38.33	+58 59 27.6	0.079	284.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 996	20 57 32.74	+51 56 38.8	0.08	288	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1740 16 36 11.09	-22 13 04.4	0.084	302.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 583	18 33 33.02	+00 37 20.6	0.084	302.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1445 04 32 08.93	+46 36 22.3	0.084	302.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 445	18 37 44.93	-09 37 21.7	0.086	309.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1778 15 39 52.49	-07 09 40.0	0.086	309.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 67	17 13 59.95	-21 53 26.2	0.088	316.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1036 20 38 13.94	+57 10 36.1	0.088	316.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1543 04 27 24.60	+18 51 40.0	0.09	324	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1507 04 43 09.65	+29 45 36.4	0.09	324	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1071 20 58 17.04	+58 11 41.3	0.092	331.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 212	18 11 03.91	-24 19 18.5	0.093	334.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 587	18 39 33.70	+00 02 46.7	0.093	334.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 520	18 21 36.43	-02 18 31.3	0.097	349.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1471 03 47 57.72	+32 54 11.9	0.097	349.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1744 16 39 59.30	-22 15 49.0	0.099	356.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 941	20 56 44.40	+45 49 35.8	0.105	378	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1710 17 20 44.69	-31 56 57.8	0.106	381.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 185	17 31 58.20	-20 17 08.9	0.108	388.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1035 21 44 40.70	+47 43 50.2	0.109	392.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1082 20 51 08.28	+60 11 19.0	0.111	399.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 950	21 00 31.85	+46 36 47.5	0.112	403.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 761	19 36 10.18	+21 06 43.9	0.116	417.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1749 17 23 10.27	-29 02 47.0	0.117	421.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1498 04 11 01.20	+24 57 44.6	0.118	424.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1468 03 40 06.89	+31 24 40.0	0.12	432	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1407 04 29 59.06	+54 16 31.8	0.13	468	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 717	19 16 13.22	+18 00 22.7	0.147	529.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 604	18 51 33.50	+00 13 38.3	0.152	547.2	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 191	16 47 48.02	-12 45 16.2	0.158	568.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 437	18 20 13.08	-07 58 37.6	0.163	586.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1399 04 24 00.74	+55 06 55.4	0.163	586.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1394 04 17 00.05	+55 17 23.3	0.184	662.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 684	19 21 49.97	+12 25 45.5	0.185	666	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1251 22 36 03.05	+75 15 34.9	0.195	702	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 978	21 01 08.28	+49 41 49.6	0.2	720	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1681 16 27 01.92	-24 46 41.5	0.206	741.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 564	18 37 35.14	-01 12 22.0	0.208	748.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 134	15 53 38.26	-04 38 49.9	0.22	792	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 636	19 06 28.54	+04 39 41.4	0.22	792	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1529 04 32 01.73	+24 26 21.5	0.223	802.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 183	15 53 54.77	-03 08 48.8	0.24	864	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 192	17 30 57.53	-19 47 13.2	0.278	1000.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 582	18 52 35.98	-01 56 17.5	0.283	1018.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1756 17 16 07.63	-27 23 17.5	0.285	1026	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1746 17 11 07.46	-27 23 38.8	0.306	1101.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1524 04 28 01.75	+24 36 37.4	0.324	1166.4	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1470 03 43 07.75	+31 49 29.3	0.403	1450.8	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1719 16 19 55.78	-20 07 09.5	0.61	2196	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 617	18 57 32.54	+01 04 03.7	0.745	2682	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 406	18 25 47.62	-11 48 13.7	0.746	2685.6	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1534 04 40 03.67	+25 35 48.8	0.87	3132	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 548	18 49 37.97	-03 41 30.1	1	3600	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1712 16 38 02.02	-24 25 57.0	1.56	5616	5&lt;br /&gt;
LDN 1495 04 18 05.11	+27 37 17.4	2.6	9360	5&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mcdonald</name></author>
		
	</entry>
</feed>