Difference between revisions of "Luminous Data Miners Data Analysis"
From CoolWiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchm |
m |
||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
|5.8 um flux err | |5.8 um flux err | ||
|date of Spitzer obs | |date of Spitzer obs | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |1 | ||
+ | |NGC4639 | ||
+ | |12 42 52.4 | ||
+ | |13 15 26 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |10/13/04 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |2/20/07 10:52 | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} |
Revision as of 20:53, 20 July 2010
- Target List from Team Oil City on Jul 16 showing the targets from this study and the observation times for data collection.
New data table from 20 July
Target number | target name | RA (J2000) | Dec (J2000) | FUV mag | FUV mag err | FUV flux density | FUV flux err | NUV mag | NUV mag err | NUV flux density | NUV flux err | date of GALEX obs | 4.5 um mag | 4.5 um mag err | 4.5 um flux density | 4.5 um flux err | 5.8 um mag | 5.8 um mag err | 5.8 um flux density | 5.8 um flux err | date of Spitzer obs |
1 | NGC4639 | 12 42 52.4 | 13 15 26 | 10/13/04 | 2/20/07 10:52 |