Difference between revisions of "Talk:CG4 Proposal"
From CoolWiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchm |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
== CG4 Discussion Page == | == CG4 Discussion Page == | ||
| Line 9: | Line 8: | ||
2. NITARP as a Professional Learning Community offering a Center of Strength in Science Teacher Leadership | 2. NITARP as a Professional Learning Community offering a Center of Strength in Science Teacher Leadership | ||
3. Include the variety of expected student populations and levels of participation, considering how we might measure impact across these groups. | 3. Include the variety of expected student populations and levels of participation, considering how we might measure impact across these groups. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | I like these three strands. Great idea, Viv. | ||
| + | --chj 17:19 CST 13-Jan-2010. | ||
Revision as of 23:19, 13 January 2010
CG4 Discussion Page
Education
Viv's assignment in the group was to organize the Education portion of our proposal. What if we make a case for the importance of: 1. Teacher/Student/Scientist Scientific Research within the context of today's national and education initiatives. 2. NITARP as a Professional Learning Community offering a Center of Strength in Science Teacher Leadership 3. Include the variety of expected student populations and levels of participation, considering how we might measure impact across these groups.
I like these three strands. Great idea, Viv.
--chj 17:19 CST 13-Jan-2010.
