Difference between revisions of "Talk:CG4 Proposal"
m |
|||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
I like these three strands. Great idea, Viv. | I like these three strands. Great idea, Viv. | ||
--chj 17:19 CST 13-Jan-2010. | --chj 17:19 CST 13-Jan-2010. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Nice Topic Breakdown; would be difficult to quantify ed outcome at such diverse ages/locations/populations as exist at Breck-Yerkes-OPRF High-Pierce College, any other way. --[[User:Mallory|Mallory]] 18:41, 18 January 2010 (PST) | ||
Revision as of 02:41, 19 January 2010
CG4 Discussion Page
Education
Viv's assignment in the group was to organize the Education portion of our proposal. What if we make a case for the importance of: 1. Teacher/Student/Scientist Scientific Research within the context of today's national and education initiatives. 2. NITARP as a Professional Learning Community offering a Center of Strength in Science Teacher Leadership 3. Include the variety of expected student populations and levels of participation, considering how we might measure impact across these groups.
I like these three strands. Great idea, Viv.
--chj 17:19 CST 13-Jan-2010.
Nice Topic Breakdown; would be difficult to quantify ed outcome at such diverse ages/locations/populations as exist at Breck-Yerkes-OPRF High-Pierce College, any other way. --Mallory 18:41, 18 January 2010 (PST)
