Difference between revisions of "CG4 Proposal"

From CoolWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 11: Line 11:
  
  
My Plan to continue Lit. searchm is to finish SIMBAD, then go to ADS and to find a way to confirm and quantify lots! of IR (probably by opacity class) and little UV/max not to exceed a threshold to be determined; don't want the object to be a middle-aged star  already.
+
My Plan to continue Lit. search--[[User:Mallory|Mallory]] 23:35, 11 January 2010 (PST) is to finish SIMBAD, then go to ADS and to find a way to confirm and quantify lots! of IR (probably by opacity class) and little UV/max not to exceed a threshold to be determined; don't want the object to be a middle-aged star  already.
  
 
Is it the group's intention to consider locations outside of CG4, which could be cluster members?   
 
Is it the group's intention to consider locations outside of CG4, which could be cluster members?   
  
 
--[[User:Mallory|Mallory]] 23:28, 11 January 2010 (PST)Carolyn
 
--[[User:Mallory|Mallory]] 23:28, 11 January 2010 (PST)Carolyn

Revision as of 07:35, 12 January 2010

Identifiers (aliases) for CG 4 ... BHR 21, Sandqvist 103, FEST 2-30, DCld 259.4-12.7

I found this by typing CG4 into SIMBAD. The results were in the middle of the page. Scrolling down further, there's a list of 20 articles in which CG 4 is mentioned.

Talk to you on Wednesday! --chj


My Plan to continue Lit. search--Mallory 23:35, 11 January 2010 (PST) is to finish SIMBAD, then go to ADS and to find a way to confirm and quantify lots! of IR (probably by opacity class) and little UV/max not to exceed a threshold to be determined; don't want the object to be a middle-aged star already.

Is it the group's intention to consider locations outside of CG4, which could be cluster members?

--Mallory 23:28, 11 January 2010 (PST)Carolyn