Difference between revisions of "Notes on SEDs from BRC27"

From CoolWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m
m
Line 58: Line 58:
 
* check photometry for the ones that need checking
 
* check photometry for the ones that need checking
 
* check images for the ones that need checking
 
* check images for the ones that need checking
 +
* compare this list to our problem children from before - any of the problem children on the old list not identified as such here too?
 
* decide out of this assessment which ones are being dropped for sure and being kept for sure
 
* decide out of this assessment which ones are being dropped for sure and being kept for sure
 
* count up number of objects in which bins: rediscovered as having ir excess, newly discovered as having IR excess, checked and noted as not having IR excess, dropped because we think they're galaxies, and dropped for bad phot (for our records, in case anyone asks)
 
* count up number of objects in which bins: rediscovered as having ir excess, newly discovered as having IR excess, checked and noted as not having IR excess, dropped because we think they're galaxies, and dropped for bad phot (for our records, in case anyone asks)

Revision as of 00:03, 29 September 2011

  • 070349.6-112346 - we need to check the photometry for i2, i3, i4 - either i2 is low or i3 is high, or i3+i4 are both a little high. If this is a YSO, it is a very low excess, probably not significant.
  • 070349.8-112822 - Shevchenko 88 - no IR excess.
  • 070351.1-112054 - yuk. drop.
  • 070352.2-112100 - Chauhan 109 - disjoint, problem child. extended emission at 2mass bands, that could be affecting photometry at all bands. could also be intrinsic variability. Need to chase down missing photometry at one of the irac bands
  • 070352.7-112313 - ogura 2/chauhan 81 - no IR excess.
  • 070352.7-112416 - drop
  • 070353.2-112403 - ogura 3 - nice little YSO. double-check i3i4 phot to be sure.
  • 070353.5-112350 - shev 90 - bright star, likely early type (check lit tables), POSSIBLE excess at i3i4
  • 070352.7-112428 - ogura 4/chauhan 82 - check i3i4 photometry
  • 070354.4-112829 - shev 92/gregorio 69 - also bright early type, only i2i4 data. prob no excess.
  • 070354.6-112011 - chauhan 108 - one of hte problem children. disjoint. extended emission. can we resolve into two sources? if this resolved in 2mass, we should be able to resolve it in irac; need to chase photmetry.
  • 070354.9-112514 - ogura5 - why only 3 bands of irac - chase that photometry, prob no excess?
  • 073557.7-112031 - gregorio71 - no excess. not a lot of data either.
  • 070357.1-112432 - ogura 7 - nice disk
  • 070358.4-112325 - check i3 photometry. without that point, could be a nice SED.
  • 070359.7-112309 - ditch it
  • 070400.7-112323 - nice little SED, high Av in JHK points, strong disk at m24, but could worry abotu source confusion (e.g., more stars than just one in the mips beam). check images for contaminating sources.
  • 070401.2-112531 - nice little SED
  • 070401.2-112242 - check irac photometry.
  • 070401.2-112233 - nice little sed
  • 070401.3-112334 - greg74 - really nice SED, check i3
  • 070401.6-112406 - go look in the images - i think this may be a galaxy. go check irac photometry too.
  • 070401.6-112132 - check irac 3 photometry - nice
  • 070402.1-112512 - check all irac bands
  • 070402.2-112342 - this is a galaxy - 8 um point is high, and it's a flat sed. check the images to be sure, but my guess is it's a QSO.
  • 070402.3-112539 - little bit of excess, very bright,
  • 070402.7-112325 - probably a galaxy. check images.
  • 070402.9-112337 - ogura8+9 - nice SED.
  • 070403.0-112350 - ogura10 - check i3, nice SED
  • 070403.1-112327 - chauhan 107 - one of our problem children with extended emission in 2mass.
  • 070403.9-112609 - shev102 - bright obj, slight IR excess if at all.
  • 070403.9-112326 - check i3, could be a nice one
  • 070404.2-112355 - ogura12/chauhan86 - nice one
  • 070404.5-112555 - ogura13 - i wish we had 2 more points. no disk?
  • 070404.7-112339 - ogura 14 - check i3
  • 070404.9-112245 - drop
  • 070405.1-112313 - ogura15/chauhan 88 - nice
  • 070405.5-112337 - check irac photom all bands - iffy. likely bad photometry
  • 070405.6-112354 - drop?? check for why no 2mass, is in the catalog but with bad photqual flags.
  • 070405.7-112123 - check i3 phot. icky otherwise.
  • 070405.9-112209 - drop
  • 070405.9-112358 - ogura 16 - nice one!
  • 070406.0-112315 - ogura 17 - nice one. check i3.
  • 070406.4-112336 - ogura 18 - nice one. check i3
  • 070406.5-112227 - yeah, could be - check i3i4
  • 070406.5-112128 - icky, drop
  • 070406.5-112316 - ogura 19 - nice one. check i3i4
  • 070407.9-112311 - ogura 21: - icky? check photometry - make sure that there is good photometry actually of this source.
  • 070408.0-112354 - ogura 22 - nice one. worry about src conf m24
  • 070508.1-112313 - ogura 21+23: - icky? check photometry - make sure that there is good photometry actually of this source.
  • 070408.1-112309 - ogura 23:, chauhan 98 - check photometry - make sure that there is good photometry actually of this source. only 2 two mass, what happened to 3rd.
  • 070409.9-112316 - wiram23/ogura25/chau100 - nice one
  • 070411.2-111647 - greg78 - only 2 bands irac but looks like there might be a disk. chekc photom.
  • 070413.2-111900 - shev 111/greg 81 - nice sed with one opt point off maybe source mismatch, or extended emission or legitimate variability given that the other points line up.


TO DO LIST:

  • check photometry for the ones that need checking
  • check images for the ones that need checking
  • compare this list to our problem children from before - any of the problem children on the old list not identified as such here too?
  • decide out of this assessment which ones are being dropped for sure and being kept for sure
  • count up number of objects in which bins: rediscovered as having ir excess, newly discovered as having IR excess, checked and noted as not having IR excess, dropped because we think they're galaxies, and dropped for bad phot (for our records, in case anyone asks)
  • make color-color and color mag plots of these groupings of objects. are they in the 'right' regions of the diagrams?
  • look at locations on the images of these groupings of objects. are they in 'good' regions of sky? (are YSO candidates near nebulosity, for example, and galaxies far away from it?)
  • fit slopes to SED to obtain classes, and count up ones in each bin (0, I, flat, II, III) (john's made headway on this)
  • possibly obtain and add optical data
  • if more optical data, go back through and reassess SEDs for feasibility in this same vein
  • if more optical data, make more color mag and color color plots to assess for viability.

repeat for BRC 34 ...