Search results

From CoolWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
  • *[http://web.ipac.caltech.edu/staff/rebull/ic2118/monitoring/ raw ground-based data to practice with] (data taken by M ...ightcurves/ luisa's light curves] (data taken by R. Makidon and used by L. Rebull for part of her [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001AJ....121.1676R thesis]
    5 KB (823 words) - 19:03, 13 May 2011
  • ...measured and reported fluxes at various bands. note that PA used MaxImDL, Rebull used apex/idl, and the rest used APT: |Rebull
    16 KB (2,368 words) - 23:54, 9 December 2008
  • ...erstellar Clouds. III. Perseus Observed with IRAC],” 2006, ApJ, 645, 1246; Rebull et al., “[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJS..171..447R The Spitzer c ...s of people using this method as a primary method for finding young stars: Rebull, “[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001AJ....121.1676R Rotation of Young Lo
    19 KB (3,198 words) - 20:05, 28 February 2017
  • *Rebull et al. 2011, ApJS, 196, 4 - I gave you a copy of this at the AAS - me, usin *Rebull et al. 2013, AJ, 145, 15 - I gave you a copy of this at the AAS - me, with
    10 KB (1,745 words) - 23:54, 3 April 2013
  • ...ect to first version below): [[file: BRC_prop3_final.doc]] --[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 09:29, 21 March 2011 (PDT) ...(i missed version 2a, sorry): [[File: BRC_prop2_lmr.doc]] --[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 13:46, 16 March 2011 (PDT)
    21 KB (3,168 words) - 16:20, 26 May 2011
  • ...ons - we had considered BRC 31, 36, 38. BRC 31 is already thoroughly done (Rebull et al. 2011). BRC 34 (which the 2011 group did), BRC 36 and BRC 38 are all ...to be sure you have all or most of the relevant papers!) --[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 15:19, 23 January 2012 (PST)
    26 KB (4,644 words) - 16:18, 8 October 2012
  • ...go retrieve data, examine it, and think about it. In the CG4/Sa101 paper (Rebull et al. 2011, [http://arxiv.org/abs/1105.1180 arXiv 1105.1180]), we rejected
    6 KB (1,069 words) - 01:42, 28 July 2020
  • [[Resolution Skills]] includes links to resolution worksheets by Dr. Luisa Rebull (see [[Measuring resolutions]] and the Resolution worksheets linked near th
    7 KB (1,074 words) - 15:58, 17 May 2022
  • ...BRC 27 and BRC 34. Our research findings are presented in another poster, Rebull et al. These teachers are from Breck School, Carmel Catholic High School, G LOVE. IT. :) --[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 12:51, 21 September 2011 (PDT)
    33 KB (5,401 words) - 15:00, 23 September 2011
  • ''Originally developed in 2018 by L. M. Rebull for [https://open.nasa.gov/blog/why-do-we-archive-astronomy-data/ NASA Open ...listentospacepod.com/episodes/2017/2/5/83-why-we-archive-with-dr-rebull?rq=rebull February 05, 2017 episode of the Spacepod podcast]].''
    7 KB (1,208 words) - 22:15, 29 July 2020
  • ...rjian et al. <BR>147.07 -­- Wiggs et al., “bonus” poster! . <BR>425.05 -­- Rebull et al. (Thurs!) <BR>337.05 -­- Johnson et al. <BR>338.07 -­- Mehta et al.
    7 KB (1,284 words) - 07:24, 6 January 2012
  • [[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 12:46, 25 May 2011 (PDT) -- NOTE on this choice of aperture for IRAC (in
    17 KB (2,902 words) - 03:49, 7 August 2013
  • * ([[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 19:21, 9 February 2011 (PST)) OK, just for comparison, here is a walkthro
    14 KB (2,315 words) - 22:36, 16 February 2011
  • ...et al 2010, Rebull et al 2011a and 2011b; possibly Johnson et al. 2012 and Rebull et al. 2012, or possibly makes more sense to wait until closer to the visit ...also an opportunity to look at this environment with WISE! do with other Rebull et al papers - "group R". This can be the lowest priority of that group, as
    34 KB (5,550 words) - 04:03, 6 June 2012
  • ...expected in U-V given their observed color in V-I. This plot was used in Rebull et al. (2000) to argue that those stars, those that are brighter than expec
    9 KB (1,583 words) - 18:15, 23 June 2021
  • ...logs.<BR> '''does it really have all of [http://web.ipac.caltech.edu/staff/rebull/working/cwayspapers/3-oktoskip/nisini01.pdf Nisini et al. (2001)] already i | got all tables from journal. ([http://web.ipac.caltech.edu/staff/rebull/working/cwayspapers/1-essential/beltran09data/ link])
    35 KB (6,201 words) - 21:11, 12 July 2012
  • ...ariability of protostars in IC 1396A. 
MORALES-CALDERON M., STAUFFER J.R., REBULL L., WHITNEY B.A., BARRADO Y NAVASCUES D., ARDILA D.R., SONG I., BROOKE T.Y.
    7 KB (982 words) - 03:36, 14 February 2011
  • ...010ApJ...720...46G 2010, ApJ, 720, 46] ([http://web.ipac.caltech.edu/staff/rebull/working/ic2118.pdf pdf]) |Rebull, L., et al., 2011, AJ, in press (CG4 paper)
    22 KB (3,737 words) - 19:10, 15 September 2011
  • |DO THIS<br> [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013AJ....145...15R Rebull et al. 2013, AJ, 145, 15]||(I gave you hard copy of this one at the AAS.) O |DO THIS<br> [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJS..196....4R Rebull et al., 2011b, ApJS, 196, 4] ||(I gave you hard copy of this one at the AAS
    35 KB (5,742 words) - 23:27, 27 February 2013
  • ...few times you try. ''CAUTION: Sloan bands (including the optical data from Rebull et al. 2012 or new data from FTN) are in AB mags, not Vega mags!'' IPHAS da ...rstand how what we did is different than what others (Chauhan, Choudhury, (Rebull/Johnson)) did with the IRAC (IRAC+MIPS) data to find young stars.
    47 KB (8,224 words) - 19:56, 24 July 2012
  • look at Rebull et al., 2011, ApJS, 196, 4 (the taurus/WISE paper) i
    17 KB (2,838 words) - 18:10, 6 May 2012
  • GUIEU S., REBULL L.M., STAUFFER J.R., HILLENBRAND L.A., CARPENTER J.M., NORIEGA-CRESPO A., P
    13 KB (1,918 words) - 03:09, 16 February 2011
  • --[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 15:57, 13 January 2010 (PST)
    33 KB (5,123 words) - 17:24, 17 April 2013
  • ''By Dr. Luisa Rebull, version 1, 19 Dec 2019, for Olivia and Tom''
    25 KB (4,424 words) - 03:25, 12 August 2020
  • ...sly identified stars. 18 of these are listed as unconfirmed candidates in Rebull et al (2010). ...ing objects in SIMBAD, 2) matches to objects identified as contaminants in Rebull at al (2010), 3) matches to the 2MASS Extended Source Catalog, and 4) ident
    42 KB (6,796 words) - 20:39, 18 May 2012
  • #Look at the various ratios in the Rebull et al. (2014) paper that tries to put all the clusters in context with each
    40 KB (7,042 words) - 20:26, 27 July 2016
  • ...rstand how what we did is different than what others (Chauhan, Choudhury, (Rebull/Johnson)) did with the IRAC (IRAC+MIPS) data to find young stars.
    46 KB (8,082 words) - 17:21, 7 August 2013

View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)