Difference between revisions of "Talk:CG4 Spring work"

From CoolWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
     *''High Level Summary''
 
     *''High Level Summary''
Found 7 new YSOs  
+
Surveyed 5 fields with 15 cometary globules
 +
Found 8 new YSOs  
 
Confirmed one previous YSO
 
Confirmed one previous YSO
  
 
Equipment Used
 
Equipment Used
 +
        Ha spectroscopy                      CTIO 60/90cm Curtis Schmidt telescope with 6deg prism    1-2hrs
 
         JHK IR photometry (sort of like us)  ESO 1m        J-H and H-K
 
         JHK IR photometry (sort of like us)  ESO 1m        J-H and H-K
 
         UBV photometry (like us)            ESO 1m
 
         UBV photometry (like us)            ESO 1m
        Ha spectroscopy                      CTIO 60/90cm Curtis Schmidt telescope with 6deg prism    1-2hrs
 
 
         Point source spectroscopy            ESO 1.52m and 3.6m        3700A to 7000A                    10-40 min
 
         Point source spectroscopy            ESO 1.52m and 3.6m        3700A to 7000A                    10-40 min
+
 
 +
    found there are different ages (spectra and movement away from globule)
 +
    Found late-type premain sequence stars
 +
 
 +
Identified spectral type using spectra
 +
ruled out forground/background with spectra and
 +
 
 
*''Most Interesting''
 
*''Most Interesting''
 
Introduction:
 
Introduction:
Line 23: Line 30:
 
         OB starformed nearby and the UV radiation scrunched and eroded nearby nebula (some evidence in this paper for this method)
 
         OB starformed nearby and the UV radiation scrunched and eroded nearby nebula (some evidence in this paper for this method)
 
         or SN went off nearby and shockwave scrunched and eroded nearby nebula
 
         or SN went off nearby and shockwave scrunched and eroded nearby nebula
+
CG4 might have been evaporating for 1,000,000years
  
  
Line 47: Line 54:
 
     absorbtion trough at 6200A deeper
 
     absorbtion trough at 6200A deeper
 
          
 
          
 
 
   
 
 
  
 
*''I agree with this''
 
*''I agree with this''
  
     found seven new YSOs in the area
+
     found eight new YSOs in the area
 
     confirmed one previous YSO
 
     confirmed one previous YSO
 
     found there are different ages (spectra and movement away from globule)  
 
     found there are different ages (spectra and movement away from globule)  
 
     Found late-type premain sequence stars
 
     Found late-type premain sequence stars
 
  
 
*''I disagree with this''
 
*''I disagree with this''
 
     found there are different ages (spectra and movement away from globule)  
 
     found there are different ages (spectra and movement away from globule)  
 
         probably continuous (from 8 stars?)
 
         probably continuous (from 8 stars?)
       
 
  
 
*''Why we should care''
 
*''Why we should care''
Line 72: Line 73:
 
     Found YSOs and confirmed previous ones
 
     Found YSOs and confirmed previous ones
 
     Found faint background stars getting more prominent in longer wavelength filters
 
     Found faint background stars getting more prominent in longer wavelength filters
     Not all CG had star formation but CG4 was one that did have it
+
     Not all CG had star formation but CG4 was one that had some nearby
  
  

Revision as of 22:12, 14 April 2010

For Apr 14:

   * KEVIN -- Reipurth and Pettersson 1993  
    http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?1993A%26A...267..439R&data_type=PDF_HIGH&whole_paper=YES&type=PRINTER&filetype=.pdf 
  • Main Point
   Found 7 new YSOs in Gum Nebula (near CG4 and Sa101 and CG13) using IR photometry, UBV photometry and spectroscopy.
   *High Level Summary

Surveyed 5 fields with 15 cometary globules Found 8 new YSOs Confirmed one previous YSO

Equipment Used

       Ha spectroscopy                      CTIO 60/90cm Curtis Schmidt telescope with 6deg prism    1-2hrs
       JHK IR photometry (sort of like us)  ESO 1m        J-H and H-K
       UBV photometry (like us)             ESO 1m
       Point source spectroscopy            ESO 1.52m and 3.6m        3700A to 7000A                    10-40 min
   found there are different ages (spectra and movement away from globule) 
   Found late-type premain sequence stars

Identified spectral type using spectra ruled out forground/background with spectra and

  • Most Interesting

Introduction:

   Good description of cometary nebulae
   Good rundown of CG formation theory
       OB starformed nearby and the UV radiation scrunched and eroded nearby nebula (some evidence in this paper for this method)
       or SN went off nearby and shockwave scrunched and eroded nearby nebula

CG4 might have been evaporating for 1,000,000years


CG4 might have been a shade for Sa101 to hide behind. Until the CG4 evaporation may have started >1,000,000 years ago. In faint background stars they found stars becoming more prominent as they used longer wavelength filters (good for us)


Spectral class

   M3 to K7
       M2, M3-4, K7-M0, K7, K2-5, K5, M1-2, K2
 
  • Not sure about this

Quesitons and Kevin trying to dodge the questions

   TiO and MgH
       using the width and 
   Ha 
       width of line (spinning?)

   Balmer series
   forbidden [OI] linesat 6300 and 6363A
   prominent absorption at 5577A
   absorbtion trough at 6200A deeper
        
  • I agree with this
   found eight new YSOs in the area
   confirmed one previous YSO
   found there are different ages (spectra and movement away from globule) 
   Found late-type premain sequence stars
  • I disagree with this
   found there are different ages (spectra and movement away from globule) 
       probably continuous (from 8 stars?)
  • Why we should care
   found seven new YSOs in the area
   confirmed one previous YSO
   Used some of the same techniques we will
   Found YSOs and confirmed previous ones
   Found faint background stars getting more prominent in longer wavelength filters
   Not all CG had star formation but CG4 was one that had some nearby


For Apr 21:

   *VIVIAN -- Kim et al 2003 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003csss...12..799K 
    Full Paper link click here. [1]
  • Main Point
  • High Level Summary
  • Most Interesting
  • I agree with this
  • I disagree with this
  • Why we should care


For Apr 28:

   *CHELEN -- Kim 2005 
   http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?2003ASPC..287..275K&data_type=PDF_HIGH&whole_paper=YES&type=PRINTER&filetype=.pdf
  • Main Point
  • High Level Summary
  • Most Interesting
  • I agree with this
  • I disagree with this
  • Why we should care


For May 5:

   *CAROLYN -- Choudhury and Bhatt 2008  
   http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0811/0811.4389v1.pdf  
   the ADS entry is http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009MNRAS.393..959C 
   and I downloaded the real journal article for you (easier to read!) here: media:choud.pdf
  • Main Point
  • High Level Summary
  • Most Interesting
  • I agree with this
  • I disagree with this
  • Why we should care