Difference between revisions of "Talk:CG4 Spring work"

From CoolWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 13: Line 13:
  
 
Equipment Used
 
Equipment Used
        Ha spectroscopy                      CTIO 60/90cm Curtis Schmidt telescope with 6deg prism    1-2hrs
+
 
        JHK IR photometry (sort of like us)  ESO 1m        J-H and H-K
+
Ha spectroscopy                      CTIO 60/90cm Curtis Schmidt telescope with 6deg prism    1-2hrs
        UBV photometry (like us)            ESO 1m
+
JHK IR photometry (sort of like us)  ESO 1m        J-H and H-K
        Point source spectroscopy            ESO 1.52m and 3.6m        3700A to 7000A                    10-40 min
+
UBV photometry (like us)            ESO 1m
 +
Point source spectroscopy            ESO 1.52m and 3.6m        3700A to 7000A                    10-40 min
  
 
found there are different ages (spectra and movement away from globule)  
 
found there are different ages (spectra and movement away from globule)  

Revision as of 22:38, 14 April 2010

For Apr 14:

   * KEVIN -- Reipurth and Pettersson 1993  
    http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?1993A%26A...267..439R&data_type=PDF_HIGH&whole_paper=YES&type=PRINTER&filetype=.pdf 
  • Main Point

Found 8 new YSOs in Gum Nebula (near CG4 and Sa101 and CG13) using IR photometry, UBV photometry and spectroscopy.

  • High Level Summary

Surveyed 5 fields with 15 cometary globules Found 8 new YSOs Confirmed one previous YSO

Equipment Used

Ha spectroscopy CTIO 60/90cm Curtis Schmidt telescope with 6deg prism 1-2hrs JHK IR photometry (sort of like us) ESO 1m J-H and H-K UBV photometry (like us) ESO 1m Point source spectroscopy ESO 1.52m and 3.6m 3700A to 7000A 10-40 min

found there are different ages (spectra and movement away from globule) Found late-type premain sequence stars

Identified spectral type using spectra ruled out forground/background with spectra and

  • Most Interesting

Introduction: Good description of cometary nebulae Good rundown of CG formation theory 1. OB starformed nearby and the UV radiation scrunched and eroded nearby nebula (some evidence in this paper for this method) 2. or SN went off nearby and shockwave scrunched and eroded nearby nebula CG4 might have been evaporating for 1,000,000years


CG4 might have been a shade for Sa101 to hide behind. Until the CG4 evaporation may have started >1,000,000 years ago. In faint background stars they found stars becoming more prominent as they used longer wavelength filters (good for us)


Spectral classes M3 to K7 M2, M3-4, K7-M0, K7, K2-5, K5, M1-2, K2

  • Not sure about this

Quesitons and Kevin trying to dodge the questions TiO and MgH using the width and

Ha

width of line (spinning?)

Balmer series forbidden [OI] linesat 6300 and 6363A prominent absorption at 5577A absorbtion trough at 6200A deeper


  • I agree with this

found eight new YSOs in the area confirmed one previous YSO found there are different ages (spectra and movement away from globule) Found late-type premain sequence stars

  • I disagree with this

found there are different ages (spectra and movement away from globule) probably continuous (from 8 stars?)

  • Why we should care

found seven new YSOs in the area confirmed one previous YSO Used some of the same techniques we will Found YSOs and confirmed previous ones Found faint background stars getting more prominent in longer wavelength filters Not all CG had star formation but CG4 was one that had some nearby


For Apr 21:

   *VIVIAN -- Kim et al 2003 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003csss...12..799K 
    Full Paper link click here. [1]
  • Main Point
  • High Level Summary
  • Most Interesting
  • I agree with this
  • I disagree with this
  • Why we should care


For Apr 28:

   *CHELEN -- Kim 2005 
   http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?2003ASPC..287..275K&data_type=PDF_HIGH&whole_paper=YES&type=PRINTER&filetype=.pdf
  • Main Point
  • High Level Summary
  • Most Interesting
  • I agree with this
  • I disagree with this
  • Why we should care


For May 5:

   *CAROLYN -- Choudhury and Bhatt 2008  
   http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0811/0811.4389v1.pdf  
   the ADS entry is http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009MNRAS.393..959C 
   and I downloaded the real journal article for you (easier to read!) here: media:choud.pdf
  • Main Point
  • High Level Summary
  • Most Interesting
  • I agree with this
  • I disagree with this
  • Why we should care