Difference between revisions of "Wendi's table of all data sources"
m |
m |
||
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|2MASS | |2MASS | ||
− | | | + | |JHKs over whole region, not just a subset |
− | | | + | |point sources can be matched across bands |
− | | | + | |over whole region! |
|- | |- | ||
|Beltran et al. 2009 | |Beltran et al. 2009 | ||
− | |NIR (JHK') and H2 (1.2-2.2 um) | + | |NIR (JHK') and H2 (1.2-2.2 um) (deeper than 2MASS!) |
|link the point sources across all available bands; look for complex H2 structures, unclear if we will find them. | |link the point sources across all available bands; look for complex H2 structures, unclear if we will find them. | ||
|Further data on BIMA 1,2,3 and Source C | |Further data on BIMA 1,2,3 and Source C |
Revision as of 23:30, 8 May 2013
Finding cluster members, originally known as "Luisa’s Table of Characteristics of Young Stars for Determining Cluster Members", may be of some interest.
The table
Wendi's table orignally included (data) source, type (wavelength), and reasoning. Anything else to add?
Data source | Wavelength(s) | Why we should care | Additional notes on this data source |
Getman et al. 2007 | X-ray | X-rays trace stellar magnetic activity, can reduce number of foreground/background objects by requiring X-ray detections. Young stars are bright in X-rays because they are rotating quickly and therefore flaring a lot. | 25 Gloubule sources identified as YSOs in the center. 117 sources tabulated in Table 1. Also, entire Nisini catalog included in Table 3. (Nisini is deeper JHK than 2MASS.) SEDs in Figure 5 good for comparison to ours. |
Choudhury et al. 2010 | |||
Chauhan et al. 2009 | |||
Ogura et al. 2002 | Halpha = 6563 A | because young accreting stars are bright in Halpha | We have updated the coordinates for the BRC 38 sources listed. Also note that they have finding charts of their sources, and of the HH sources they have identified here. Objects tabulated in this paper with small Ha EQWs are probably just chromospheric activity and not accretion. |
Barentsen et al. 2011 | |||
IPHAS | |||
Nakano et al. 2012 | |||
2MASS | JHKs over whole region, not just a subset | point sources can be matched across bands | over whole region! |
Beltran et al. 2009 | NIR (JHK') and H2 (1.2-2.2 um) (deeper than 2MASS!) | link the point sources across all available bands; look for complex H2 structures, unclear if we will find them. | Further data on BIMA 1,2,3 and Source C |
WISE | |||
AKARI | |||
Spitzer |
Areas covered (from our proposal)
Figure 4: This WISE-4 (22μm) greyscale image of the BRC 38 region (~40’ on a side) is the region of proposed study; the green circle is 20’ in radius (~40’ diameter). The central green square is the region covered by all four Spitzer IRAC bands. The green dashed-line square to the lower left is the serendipitous IRAC 2 & 4 (4.8 & 8 μm) data and the green dashed-line square in the upper right is the serendipitous IRAC 1 & 3 (3.6 & 5.8 μm) data. The red square shows the Spitzer MIPS -24 μm coverage and the red rectangle is MIPS-70 μm coverage. The large blue box in the center is the Chandra field of view for the observation discussed in Getman et al. (2007). The optical data from Chauhan et al. (2011), Choudhury et al. (2010), and Ogura et al. (2002) are largely within the region of IRAC 4-band coverage. The deep JHK data from Beltrán et al. (2009) are in a region comparable to the IRAC 4-band coverage.