Search results

From CoolWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
  • ...008b, Rebull et al. 2007, Harvey et al. 2007, Gutermuth et al. 2008, 2009, Rebull et al. 2010, 2011) and now WISE too (Koenig et al. 2011).
    7 KB (1,203 words) - 20:14, 20 April 2015
  • ...e analyzed for BRC 27 and 34 by a prior NITARP team (Johnson et al., 2012, Rebull et al. in prep; see also Choudhury et al. 2010 for BRC 27) and for BRC 38 b ...owing the procedure in, e.g., Johnson et al. (2012 -- a 2011 NITARP team), Rebull et al. 2011 -- a 2010 NITARP team), and Guieu et al. (2009, ApJ, 720, 46 --
    7 KB (1,101 words) - 18:10, 6 May 2012
  • ...youtube.com/watch?v=WZrzxFqWU_s Movie (31:09) on IR missions] -- Dr. Luisa Rebull (2015)
    3 KB (543 words) - 20:10, 11 August 2020
  • Dr. Rebull put together a list of people, places, things that we should check out at t ...paration, conversation, sharing plots, brainstorming, etc. --[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 13:12, 22 January 2010 (PST)
    9 KB (1,429 words) - 06:27, 6 January 2012
  • ...and educators from all over the world. Working alongside astronomer Luisa Rebull (Spitzer Science Center) and with teacher/student teams from Oregon and Flo
    4 KB (584 words) - 22:11, 23 January 2012
  • *[http://web.ipac.caltech.edu/staff/rebull/ic2118/monitoring/ raw ground-based data to practice with] (data taken by M ...ightcurves/ luisa's light curves] (data taken by R. Makidon and used by L. Rebull for part of her [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001AJ....121.1676R thesis]
    5 KB (823 words) - 19:03, 13 May 2011
  • ...measured and reported fluxes at various bands. note that PA used MaxImDL, Rebull used apex/idl, and the rest used APT: |Rebull
    16 KB (2,368 words) - 23:54, 9 December 2008
  • ...erstellar Clouds. III. Perseus Observed with IRAC],” 2006, ApJ, 645, 1246; Rebull et al., “[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJS..171..447R The Spitzer c ...s of people using this method as a primary method for finding young stars: Rebull, “[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001AJ....121.1676R Rotation of Young Lo
    19 KB (3,216 words) - 23:02, 25 January 2024
  • *Rebull et al. 2011, ApJS, 196, 4 - I gave you a copy of this at the AAS - me, usin *Rebull et al. 2013, AJ, 145, 15 - I gave you a copy of this at the AAS - me, with
    10 KB (1,745 words) - 23:54, 3 April 2013
  • ...ect to first version below): [[file: BRC_prop3_final.doc]] --[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 09:29, 21 March 2011 (PDT) ...(i missed version 2a, sorry): [[File: BRC_prop2_lmr.doc]] --[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 13:46, 16 March 2011 (PDT)
    21 KB (3,168 words) - 16:20, 26 May 2011
  • ...ons - we had considered BRC 31, 36, 38. BRC 31 is already thoroughly done (Rebull et al. 2011). BRC 34 (which the 2011 group did), BRC 36 and BRC 38 are all ...to be sure you have all or most of the relevant papers!) --[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 15:19, 23 January 2012 (PST)
    26 KB (4,644 words) - 16:18, 8 October 2012
  • ...go retrieve data, examine it, and think about it. In the CG4/Sa101 paper (Rebull et al. 2011, [http://arxiv.org/abs/1105.1180 arXiv 1105.1180]), we rejected
    6 KB (1,069 words) - 01:42, 28 July 2020
  • [[Resolution Skills]] includes links to resolution worksheets by Dr. Luisa Rebull (see [[Measuring resolutions]] and the Resolution worksheets linked near th
    7 KB (1,074 words) - 16:32, 6 October 2022
  • ...BRC 27 and BRC 34. Our research findings are presented in another poster, Rebull et al. These teachers are from Breck School, Carmel Catholic High School, G LOVE. IT. :) --[[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 12:51, 21 September 2011 (PDT)
    33 KB (5,401 words) - 15:00, 23 September 2011
  • ''Originally developed in 2018 by L. M. Rebull for [https://open.nasa.gov/blog/why-do-we-archive-astronomy-data/ NASA Open ...listentospacepod.com/episodes/2017/2/5/83-why-we-archive-with-dr-rebull?rq=rebull February 05, 2017 episode of the Spacepod podcast]].''
    7 KB (1,208 words) - 22:15, 29 July 2020
  • ...rjian et al. <BR>147.07 -­- Wiggs et al., “bonus” poster! . <BR>425.05 -­- Rebull et al. (Thurs!) <BR>337.05 -­- Johnson et al. <BR>338.07 -­- Mehta et al.
    7 KB (1,284 words) - 07:24, 6 January 2012
  • [[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 12:46, 25 May 2011 (PDT) -- NOTE on this choice of aperture for IRAC (in
    17 KB (2,902 words) - 03:49, 7 August 2013
  • * ([[User:Rebull|Rebull]] 19:21, 9 February 2011 (PST)) OK, just for comparison, here is a walkthro
    14 KB (2,315 words) - 22:36, 16 February 2011
  • ...et al 2010, Rebull et al 2011a and 2011b; possibly Johnson et al. 2012 and Rebull et al. 2012, or possibly makes more sense to wait until closer to the visit ...also an opportunity to look at this environment with WISE! do with other Rebull et al papers - "group R". This can be the lowest priority of that group, as
    34 KB (5,550 words) - 04:03, 6 June 2012
  • ...expected in U-V given their observed color in V-I. This plot was used in Rebull et al. (2000) to argue that those stars, those that are brighter than expec
    9 KB (1,583 words) - 18:15, 23 June 2021

View (previous 20 | next 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)